Simulation of Binder Infiltration in Additive Manufacturing of Sand Molds
Source abstract
Abstract
This article proposes a computational fluid dynamics approach to simulate binder infiltration in 3D printing of sand molds using OpenFOAM facilitating the identification of suitable levers for application‐specific material and process developments. A method for randomly generating powder bulks of designated powder size distributions (PSD) and procedures for automated analysis of the infiltration profile and volume are introduced. Simulation is utilized to investigate binder infiltration using different droplet spacings, representing different printheads’ resolutions. The apparent particle size at the exact location of the droplets’ impact, the droplets’ landing position in relation to the respective surface topography, and thus the statistical appearance of particle formations appear to be influencing the infiltration profile. High‐speed camera observations show the plausibility of the predicted infiltration kinetics. An exemplary use case compares the predicted infiltration profiles to the compressive strength of specimens printed from silica sand with low binder contents. Simulation predicts an average infiltration of 250 μm that presumably achieves reliable bonding for layer thicknesses up to 365 μm. A decrease in strength with increasing layer thickness at constant binder contents can be found in the experiment – at layer thicknesses above 350 μm, only minor strengths are achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Institute for Casting Composite and Processing Technology IGCV Lichtenbergstr. 15 85748 Garching Germany
TUM School of Engineering and Design Technical University of Munich TUM Boltzmannstr. 15 85748 Garching Germany
Funding
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. · 2017
2. 10.3390/ma1416463910.3390/ma14164639 ↗
3. 10.1007/s41230-017-6109-z10.1007/s41230-017-6109-z ↗
4. GE GE Renewable Energy Fraunhofer IGCV and voxeljet AG plan to develop world's largest sand binder jetting 3D printer for offshore wind turbines | GE News 2021 https://www.ge.com/news/press-releases/ge-renewable-energy-fraunhofer-igcv-voxeljet-plan-develop-world-largest-sand-binder-jetting-3D-printer-offshore-wind-turbines(accessed: December 2022).
5. Mostafaei A. · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 40 · 100707
6. A. P.Clares G.Manogharan inASME 2021 16th Int. Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conf. online/virtual2021 https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2021-63351.10.1115/MSEC2021-63351 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40964-021-00214-110.1007/s40964-021-00214-1 ↗
8. G.Miao W.Du Z.Pei C.Ma inASME 2019 14th Int. Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conf. Erie PA USA2019 https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2019-2925.10.1115/MSEC2019-2925 ↗
9. 10.1142/S021798491850272X10.1142/S021798491850272X ↗
10. 10.32604/cmes.2020.0992310.32604/cmes.2020.09923 ↗
11. 10.1051/matecconf/20223550100910.1051/matecconf/202235501009 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10171110.1016/j.addma.2020.101711 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0347210.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03472 ↗
14. 10.3390/app1204189810.3390/app12041898 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.01510.1016/j.ces.2016.07.015 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.405094210.1115/1.4050942 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.0c0357210.1021/acsami.0c03572 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14597910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145979 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-019-38862-710.1038/s41598-019-38862-7 ↗
20. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2022-026410.1108/RPJ-08-2022-0264 ↗
21. Cheng Y.-L. · Addit. Manuf. · 2022 · 56 · 102929
22. 10.3390/ma1511379810.3390/ma15113798 ↗
23. OpenCFD Limited · 2019
24. Strobel Quarzsand GmbH GS14 RP 2022 https://www.strobel-quarzsand.de/media/GS14RP.pdf(accessed: January 2023).
25. GIMP GNU Image Manipulation Program 2023 https://docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/(accessed: January 2023).
26. 10.1007/s40962-021-00700-w10.1007/s40962-021-00700-w ↗
27. OpenFOAM User Guide 2022 https://www.openfoam.com/documentation/user-guide(accessed: December 2022).
28. 10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-Y10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-Y ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b0048010.1021/acs.iecr.5b00480 ↗
30. Chen F. · 2011
31. 10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X10.1016/0022-5096(63)90036-X ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.03.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.03.015 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.312332410.1115/1.3123324 ↗
34. Eaton J. W. · 2020
35. 10.1002/nme.257910.1002/nme.2579 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11465-018-0508-810.1007/s11465-018-0508-8 ↗
37. M.Scheel Doctoral Thesis University of Göttingen Göttingen2009.
38. 10.1007/s41230-021-1085-810.1007/s41230-021-1085-8 ↗
39. Kitware Inc. ParaView's Python Documentation: Version 5.9.0 2022 https://kitware.github.io/paraview-docs/v5.9.0/python/(accessed: December 2022).
40. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
41. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb10942.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb10942.x ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c0285610.1021/acs.iecr.1c02856 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.oceram.2021.10019110.1016/j.oceram.2021.100191 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00170-010-2821-110.1007/s00170-010-2821-1 ↗
45. 10.1006/jcis.2002.852710.1006/jcis.2002.8527 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11702010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.117020 ↗
47. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/49/49423610.1088/0953-8984/20/49/494236 ↗
48. 10.1038/nmat211710.1038/nmat2117 ↗