Vibratory polishing effects on passivity of 304L stainless steel surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Surface spectroscopy analysis and electrochemistry were applied to study the effects of surface preparation by vibratory polishing on the passivity of stainless steel 304L surfaces. Compared to grinding by traditional mechanical polishing, vibratory polishing promotes the enrichment of Cr(III) oxide and hydroxide species in the duplex chemical structure of the surface native oxide film by enhancing selective Fe oxidation and dissolution. As a result, spontaneous passivity, tested in aggressive sulphuric acid electrolyte, is enhanced. However, in the absence of enrichment in Mo(IV) and Mo(VI) species in the passive film, the Cr enrichment does not enhance passivity upon anodic polarisation nor increase the resistance to Cl-induced passivity breakdown and initiation of localised corrosion in accelerated testing conditions. The results provide comprehensive insight into the mechanisms underlying the passivity enhancement of stainless steel by surface engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CNRS - Chimie ParisTech, Institut de Recherche de Chimie Paris (IRCP), Physical Chemistry of Surfaces Group, PSL Research University, Paris, France
Funding
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/met1101013510.3390/met11010135 ↗
2. 10.1007/s43452-020-0010-z10.1007/s43452-020-0010-z ↗
3. 10.1007/s10853-020-05109-010.1007/s10853-020-05109-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coelec.2022.10113110.1016/j.coelec.2022.101131 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41529-020-00126-510.1038/s41529-020-00126-5 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1315340210.3390/ma13153402 ↗
7. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac030810.1149/1945-7111/ac0308 ↗
8. 10.1149/1945-7111/abcc3610.1149/1945-7111/abcc36 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13815010.1016/j.electacta.2021.138150 ↗
10. 10.1149/2.1341811jes10.1149/2.1341811jes ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.05410.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.054 ↗
12. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac4bf710.1149/1945-7111/ac4bf7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11625610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116256 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10877910.1016/j.corsci.2020.108779 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13515910.1016/j.electacta.2019.135159 ↗
16. 10.3389/fmats.2019.0023210.3389/fmats.2019.00232 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0321911jes10.1149/2.0321911jes ↗
18. 10.1149/1.210845110.1149/1.2108451 ↗
19. Klapetek P, Neˇ D, Anderson C, Gwyddion user guide. 2009 [accessed 2023 Mar 19]. Available from: http://gwyddion.net/documentation/user-guide-en/
20. S. Alignment, the avantage data system. n.d. [accessed 2023 Mar 19]. Available from: https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/brochures/D16062∼.pdf
21. 10.1149/1945-7111/abf30810.1149/1945-7111/abf308 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.14943510.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149435 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11023310.1016/j.corsci.2022.110233 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.00910.1016/j.corsci.2018.08.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/0010-938X(89)90011-510.1016/0010-938X(89)90011-5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15168110.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151681 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.00110.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.00810.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.008 ↗
29. 10.1002/sia.214010.1002/sia.2140 ↗
30. 10.1149/1945-7111/abc72710.1149/1945-7111/abc727 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41529-019-0091-410.1038/s41529-019-0091-4 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41529-023-00330-z10.1038/s41529-023-00330-z ↗