journal article·2024-11Open access

The Effect of Grain Boundary Misorientation on Hydrogen Flux Using a Phase‐Field‐Based Diffusion and Trapping Model

Abdelrahman Hussein, Byungki Kim, Kim Verbeken, Tom Depover

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 26· Issue 22

Abstract

Understanding hydrogen–grain boundary (GB) interactions is critical to the analysis of hydrogen embrittlement in metals. This work presents a mesoscale fully kinetic model to investigate the effect of GB misorientation on hydrogen diffusion and trapping using phase‐field‐based representative volume elements (RVEs). The flux equation consists of three terms: a diffusive term and two terms for high and low angle grain boundary (H/LAGB) trapping. Uptake simulations show that decreasing the grain size results in higher hydrogen content due to increasing the GB density. Permeation simulations show that GBs are high‐flux paths due to their higher enrichment with hydrogen. Since HAGBs have higher enrichment than LAGBs, due to their higher trap‐binding energy, they generally have the highest hydrogen flux. Nevertheless, the flux shows a convoluted behavior as it depends on the local concentration, alignment of GB with external concentration gradient as well as the GB network connectivity. Finally, decreasing the grain size resulted in a larger break‐through time and a larger steady‐state exit flux.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Textiles and Chemical Engineering Ghent University Technologiepark 46 B‐9052 Ghent Belgium

Future Convergence Engineering and School of Mechatronics Engineering Korea University of Technology and Education Cheonan Chungnam 31253 Republic of Korea

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek · National Research Foundation of Korea

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.04010.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.040 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20240077610.1002/adem.202400776 ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20230040610.1002/adem.202300406 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.17110.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.171 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.04810.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.048 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.02010.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.020 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.11585910.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115859 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.25110.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.251 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.01210.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.11504310.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115043 ↗
11. 10.1111/ffe.1407410.1111/ffe.14074 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.21110.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.211 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aaz012210.1126/science.aaz0122 ↗
14. 10.1080/02670836.2017.129927610.1080/02670836.2017.1299276 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.027 ↗
16. 10.2320/matertrans1960.20.34910.2320/matertrans1960.20.349 ↗
17. McNabb A. · Trans. Metall. Soc. · 1963 · 227 · 618
18. 10.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-710.1016/0001-6160(70)90078-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/0022-5096(89)90002-110.1016/0022-5096(89)90002-1 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00064-710.1016/S0022-5096(98)00064-7 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10704-019-00411-810.1007/s10704-019-00411-8 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10281810.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102818 ↗
23. Hussein A. · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2023 · 1445
24. 10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.02110.1016/j.cma.2018.07.021 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11663-000-0032-010.1007/s11663-000-0032-0 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.00710.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.11029510.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110295 ↗
28. 10.1088/0965-0393/17/7/07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.11533910.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115339 ↗
31. The HDF Group Hierarchical Data Format Version 5 NNNN https://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/(accessed: June 2023).
32. S.Balay S.Abhyankar M. F.Adams S.Benson J.Brown P.Brune K.Buschelman E. M.Constantinescu L.Dalcin A.Dener V.Eijkhout J.Faibussowitsch W. D.Gropp V.Hapla T.Isaac P.Jolivet D.Karpeev D.Kaushik M. G.Knepley F.Kong S.Kruger D. A.May L. C.McInnes R. T.Mills L.Mitchell T.Munson J. E.Roman K.Rupp P.Sanan J.Sarich et al. PETSc Web Page https://petsc.org/(accessed: June 2023).
33. 10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-110.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.13110.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.131 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.12140710.1103/PhysRevB.83.121407 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.09310.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.093 ↗
37. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00004-910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00004-9 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.03210.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.032 ↗
39. Jun Y. · 2011 · 17
40. 10.3390/met810077910.3390/met8100779 ↗
41. 10.1080/02670836.2017.134201510.1080/02670836.2017.1342015 ↗
42. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00446-710.1016/1359-6454(95)00446-7 ↗
43. 10.1007/BF0281202310.1007/BF02812023 ↗