journal article·2021-06

Comparison of Laser Powder Bed Fusion and Cast Inconel 713 Alloy in Terms of Their Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Fatigue Life

Jun-Ren Zhao, Fei-Yi Hung, Chien-Sheng Lu, I-Chun Lai

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 23· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and casting Inconel 713 are used as the experimental materials for comparing the microstructure, mechanical properties, and fatigue characteristics. According to the results, the LPBF specimen has a columnar grain morphology that completely differs from the dendritic structure in the casting specimen, little difference in the hardness of the two specimens. In terms of mechanical properties, the LPBF specimen shows higher strength than the casting specimen but slightly lower ductility. In terms of fatigue characteristics, the LPBF specimen is better than the casting specimen under all loadings. For the LPBF specimen, solution heat treatment is used, which can cause the γ' phase to precipitate on the grain boundary and result in a texture effect. This promotes fracture during tensile and considerably reduces ductility. Nevertheless, the unheated LPBF Inconel 713 exhibits better strength and fatigue properties than casting specimens and can, thus, replace the traditional casting materials in the aerospace industry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering National Cheng Kung University Tainan 701 Taiwan

Additive Manufacturing System Innovation Department, Laser and Additive Manufacturing Technology Center Industrial Technology Research Institute Tainan 734 Taiwan

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Donachie M. J. · 2003
2. 10.3390/met901004710.3390/met9010047 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01584-210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01584-2 ↗
4. Kunz L. · Mater. Sci. · 2008 · 14 · 221
5. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.04210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.042 ↗
6. 10.1179/mst.1986.2.5.46110.1179/mst.1986.2.5.461 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60677-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)60677-5 ↗
8. 10.1108/1355254061070701310.1108/13552540610707013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2010.06.01510.1016/j.optlastec.2010.06.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.10057810.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100578 ↗
11. Chen K. J. · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2020 · 9 · 9242
12. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.08.04910.1016/j.jmst.2019.08.049 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13918010.1016/j.msea.2020.139180 ↗
14. Yu Y. · Acta Metall. Sin. · 2020
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.05110.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.051 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.12.00210.1016/j.optlastec.2012.12.002 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20150041910.1002/adem.201500419 ↗
18. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2015-010510.1108/RPJ-08-2015-0105 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.08510.1016/j.msea.2017.12.085 ↗
20. 10.3390/met905050110.3390/met9050501 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.01010.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmst.2014.09.02010.1016/j.jmst.2014.09.020 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.05810.1016/j.msea.2017.08.058 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12598-019-01321-310.1007/s12598-019-01321-3 ↗
25. Hack H. · Addit. Manuf. · 2017 · 14 · 105
26. Amato K. N. · J. Mater. Sci. Res. · 2012 · 1 · 3
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.03210.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.032 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.03510.1016/j.msea.2015.05.035 ↗
29. 10.1080/10426914.2016.125780510.1080/10426914.2016.1257805 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.02110.1016/j.msea.2015.06.021 ↗
31. 10.3390/met1001002110.3390/met10010021 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.03010.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.030 ↗
33. 10.1007/s40964-018-0062-210.1007/s40964-018-0062-2 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.02710.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.027 ↗
35. 10.1108/1355254131132328110.1108/13552541311323281 ↗
36. 10.3390/met1007088210.3390/met10070882 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.09.02510.1016/j.msea.2013.09.025 ↗
38. W.Philpott M. A.Jepson R. C.ThomsoninProc. from the Eight Int. Conf. (EPRI 2016) Albufeira Algarve2016 pp.11–14.
39. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.03810.1016/j.msea.2017.11.038 ↗
40. 10.2320/matertrans.M201128710.2320/matertrans.M2011287 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.02410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.024 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.13610.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.136 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.10029910.1016/j.mtla.2019.100299 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.02910.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.029 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10106010.1016/j.addma.2020.101060 ↗