journal article·2015-12

Stability of an Amorphous TiCuNi Alloy Subjected to High‐Pressure Torsion at Different Temperatures

Dmitry Gunderov, Viacheslav Slesarenko, Alexander Lukyanov, Anna Churakova, Evgeniy Boltynjuk, Vladinir Pushin, Evgeniy Ubyivovk, Alexander Shelyakov, Ruslan Valiev

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 17· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The amorphous melt‐spun (MS) Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy is subjected to high‐pressure torsion (HPT) at temperatures of 20‐150 °C. The bright‐field (BF) TEM images of the alloy change as a result of HPT processing, the view of the bright‐field image depends on the temperature of HPT processing. HPT processing leads to a decrease in the energy of structural relaxation during heating up to 400 °C, in comparison with the initial MS ribbons. The temperature of crystallization of the MS Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy decreases after HPT processing by 40–20 °C (depends on the temperature of HPT processing). In the MS Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy, HPT processing and subsequent annealing produces noticeably finer grains than annealing at 450 °C of the initial MS alloy. Consequently, HPT processing alters the crystallization kinetics of the MS Ti50Ni25Cu25 alloy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ufa State Aviation Technical University 12 K. Marx str. Ufa 450000 Russia

Saint Petersburg State University 28 Universitetskiy pr. Saint Petersburg 198504 Russia

Ural Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Metal Physics 18 S. Kovalevskaya str. Ekaterinburg 620041 Russia

National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) 31 Kashirskoe sh. Moscow 115409 Russia

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-910.1016/S0079-6425(99)00007-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.00410.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00705-710.1016/S0304-8853(98)00705-7 ↗
4. Gunderov D. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2010 · 25 · 58
5. 10.1080/0950083031000165735310.1080/09500830310001657353 ↗
6. Greer A. L. · 1993 · 269
7. 10.1063/1.233659810.1063/1.2336598 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.09710.1016/j.msea.2012.04.097 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.00510.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.005 ↗
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JMNM.24-25.710.4028/www.scientific.net/JMNM.24-25.7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.01510.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.015 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.03.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2012.03.008 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.295937910.1063/1.2959379 ↗
14. Gunderov D. V. · Deform. Fracture Mater. · 2006 · 4 · 22
15. 10.1134/S0031918X1203012X10.1134/S0031918X1203012X ↗
16. Matveeva N. M. · Phys. Met. Metallogr. · 1997 · 83 · 626
17. Shelyakov A. V. · 1999 · 295
18. 10.1557/mrs2009.12210.1557/mrs2009.122 ↗
19. 10.1134/S0031918X1203013110.1134/S0031918X12030131 ↗
20. Gleiter H. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 4 · 517
21. 10.3367/UFNe.0181.201112b.126510.3367/UFNe.0181.201112b.1265 ↗