journal article·2025-09

Comparative corrosion behaviour of different alloys for nitric acid service in reprocessing plants

K. Chandra, Sanket Das, Amrita Mahanti Ghosal

Publisher page

Abstract

In nuclear spent fuel reprocessing plants in India, austenitic stainless steel (SS) 304L serves as the structural material for critical components that handle boiling nitric acid. SS 304L is prone to intergranular corrosion (IGC) in the transpassive region of the polarisation curve. As a result, there is a need to replace SS 304L with corrosion-resistant alloys of Ti or Zr. In this regard, the corrosion behaviour of two candidate alloys, Ti–Al–Zr and Zircaloy-4, was assessed and compared with SS 304L. The corrosion evaluation was performed using electrochemical tests, corrosion immersion tests in three different phases (liquid, vapour and condensate) of nitric acid, and metallographic examination. Both Ti–Al–Zr and Zircaloy-4 exhibited a broad passivity range of up to 3 V Ag/AgCl in various nitric acid solutions. Based on these investigations, it was concluded that both Ti–Al–Zr and Zircaloy-4 are suitable for use in critical components handling boiling nitric acid with a high concentration of strongly oxidising ions. The corrosion resistance of the three alloys tested was ranked as: Zircaloy-4 > Ti–Al–Zr > SS 304L.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Processing & Corrosion Engineering Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

Nuclear Recycle Board, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.18520/cs/v123/i3/281-29210.18520/cs/v123/i3/281-292 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.03.00110.1016/j.pnucene.2017.03.001 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-981-16-9302-1_410.1007/978-981-16-9302-1_4 ↗
4. 10.1179/1743278211Y.000000001610.1179/1743278211Y.0000000016 ↗
5. 10.1007/978-1-4615-8258-8_310.1007/978-1-4615-8258-8_3 ↗
6. Sedriks AJ. Corrosion of stainless steels. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
7. 10.5006/1.327730110.5006/1.3277301 ↗
8. 10.5006/0010-9312-30.1.110.5006/0010-9312-30.1.1 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0281836810.1007/BF02818368 ↗
10. 10.1504/IJNEST.2005.00714610.1504/IJNEST.2005.007146 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11661-005-0201-510.1007/s11661-005-0201-5 ↗
12. 10.1179/bcj.1990.25.2.9710.1179/bcj.1990.25.2.97 ↗
13. 10.1179/00070599279826881910.1179/000705992798268819 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11665-007-9117-010.1007/s11665-007-9117-0 ↗
15. ASTM A262–15. Standard practices for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in austenitic stainless steels. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2015.
16. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2005.07.00110.1016/j.pnucene.2005.07.001 ↗
17. 10.1108/eb05333510.1108/eb053335 ↗
18. 10.1533/9780857095343.5.67910.1533/9780857095343.5.679 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.10.01710.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.10.017 ↗
20. Henthorne M. Intergranular corrosion of iron and nickel base alloys, in localised corrosion – cause of metal failure. In: Henthorne M (eds) ASTM STP 516. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM, 1972, pp.66–119.
21. Kain V, Chandra K, Kumar MK, et al. Corrosion of stainless steels in nitric acid service: corrosion degradation issues and control measures. In: Proc. Conf. Eurocorr 2010, Moscow, Sep 2010, pp.1–22: European Federation of Corrosion, 9133.
22. 10.1149/1.242730410.1149/1.2427304 ↗
23. Mclntosh B, Evans TE. The effect of metal species present in irradiated fuel elements on the corrosion of stainless steels in nitric acid. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on ‘Peaceful uses of atomic energy’, Vol. 9, pp.206–215. Geneva, Switzerland: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1956,
24. 10.1080/18811248.1998.973387110.1080/18811248.1998.9733871 ↗
25. 10.1023/A:100349930959010.1023/A:1003499309590 ↗
26. 10.1080/18811248.1998.973389810.1080/18811248.1998.9733898 ↗
27. 10.5006/106610.5006/1066 ↗
28. 10.2355/isijinternational.46.56710.2355/isijinternational.46.567 ↗
29. 10.5006/1.329031610.5006/1.3290316 ↗
30. 10.1016/B978-044452787-5.00053-610.1016/B978-044452787-5.00053-6 ↗
31. 10.13182/NT14-9010.13182/NT14-90 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.00910.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.009 ↗
33. 10.1016/0010-938X(90)90119-P10.1016/0010-938X(90)90119-P ↗
34. 10.5006/0010-9312-13.5.1710.5006/0010-9312-13.5.17 ↗
35. Thomas DE. Proceedings of the Titanium 1986-products and applications, Vol. I. Dayton, Ohio, USA. pp.220–240.
36. ASM Metals handbook. Corrosion: materials, 1st ed., Vol. 13B. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2005, pp.261–262.
37. 10.2355/isijinternational.31.18910.2355/isijinternational.31.189 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.21610.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.216 ↗
39. 10.1080/1478422X.2023.221246610.1080/1478422X.2023.2212466 ↗
40. 10.1081/AMP-20004160210.1081/AMP-200041602 ↗
41. 10.1016/0010-938X(90)90117-N10.1016/0010-938X(90)90117-N ↗
42. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.18910.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.189 ↗
43. Charlot G, Collumeau MMEA, Marchon MJC. Selected constants oxidation-reduction potentials of inorganic substances in aqueous solution, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). London: Butterworths, 1971.
44. Pedeferri P. Corrosion science and engineering. In: Lazzari Luciano Pedeferri MariaPia (eds) Switzerland AG: Springer Nature. 2018. pp.95–96.10.1007/978-3-319-97625-9 ↗
45. 10.1016/0013-4686(92)85014-C10.1016/0013-4686(92)85014-C ↗
46. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.01010.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.010 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00188-410.1016/S0010-938X(03)00188-4 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11665-020-05300-z10.1007/s11665-020-05300-z ↗
49. 10.1149/1.279973110.1149/1.2799731 ↗
50. Gwinner B, Badji H, Benoit M, et al. Corrosion of zirconium in the context of the Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plant. In: Proceedings of GLOBAL 2015., Sep 20–24, 2015, Paris (France), Paper 5265
51. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.05810.1016/j.jmst.2020.05.058 ↗
52. 10.3390/met1206092210.3390/met12060922 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2023.10503910.1016/j.pnucene.2023.105039 ↗
54. 10.13182/NT12-7310.13182/NT12-73 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.electacta.2023.14191710.1016/j.electacta.2023.141917 ↗