journal article·2026-08

Influence of time and composition on A106 steel Corrosion in blended 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and diethylenetriamine solution

Hongjie Li, Rui Fan, Chao Miao, Fengyu Zhang, Weiman Xie, Ganghua Huang, Junjie Zhao, Dongfang Guo, Yanfang Fan, Yong Xiang

Publisher page

Abstract

During CO 2 capture, the corrosion of equipment materials is the key factors affecting the economic benefits and safety of CO 2 capture. This study examined the corrosion behaviours and mechanisms of A106 steel in both a single diethylenetriamine (DETA) system and blended 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP)-DETA amine systems under simulated post-combustion CO 2 /O 2 flue gas conditions. The time-dependent corrosion behaviour of AMP-DETA blends was systematically evaluated, enabling comparison with observations from single-amine solutions. The results showed that the corrosion rate of A106 steel was always higher than 3.6 mm/y in 3.0 mol/L DETA solution. With the addition of AMP, the corrosion rate decreased obviously. Compared with 3.0 mol/L DETA solution, the corrosion rate in 2.5 mol/L AMP + 0.5 mol/L DETA solution was about 0.42 mm/y at 360 h, corresponding to an approximate 88% reduction. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analyses identified Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 3 O 4 as the main corrosion products, along with adsorbed short-chain amines. This study suggests that AMP-DETA blends may produce a synergistic inhibitory effect on A106 steel corrosion, with AMP addition promoting the formation of protective mixed organic-inorganic surface films. These observations provide mechanistic insights for solvent formulation and material selection in CO 2 capture processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Energetic Materials and Combustion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Research Institute of Natural Gas Technology, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, China

PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company, Chengdu, China

China University of Petroleum

CHN Energy Investment Group Co., Ltd

National Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Flexible Coal Power Generation and Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage, Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute, Beijing, China

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China · Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China · the National Science and Technology Major Project for New Oil and Gas Exploration and Development · Science and Technology Plan Project of Southwest Oil & Gasfield Company

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Vega F, Sanna A, Navarrete B, et al. Degradation of amine-based solvents in CO2 capture process by chemical absorption. Greenhouse Gases: Science Technology, 2014, 4: 707–733.
2. 10.1080/1478422X.2017.130469010.1080/1478422X.2017.1304690 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13393210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133932 ↗
4. 10.1179/1743278210Y.000000000110.1179/1743278210Y.0000000001 ↗
5. 10.1177/1478422X24123919110.1177/1478422X241239191 ↗
6. Ingle A, Gupta KK, Bahrebar S, et al. Impact of impurities in captured CO2 on pipeline corrosion: part I–mechanistic behaviour. Corrosion Eng Sci Technol 2025: 1478422X251396197.
7. Saiwan C, Supap T, Idem RO, et al. Part 3: corrosion and prevention in post- combustion CO2 capture systems. Carbon Manag 2011; 2: 659–675.
8. Choi YS, Duan D, Nešić S, et al. Effect of impurities on the corrosion behavior of CO2 transmission pipeline steel in supercritical CO2-water environments. Corrosion 2010; 66: 125004–125010.
9. 10.1021/ie950632810.1021/ie9506328 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ces.2011.08.05110.1016/j.ces.2011.08.051 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.03910.1016/j.egypro.2011.01.039 ↗
12. Roberge PR. Handbook of Corrosion Engineering [M]. New York, USA: McGraw- Hill, 1999.
13. 10.1021/ie04932910.1021/ie049329 ↗
14. 10.1039/C7RA01352C10.1039/C7RA01352C ↗
15. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.133810.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1338 ↗
16. 10.2516/ogst/201316110.2516/ogst/2013161 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.01010.1016/j.ijggc.2019.01.010 ↗
18. 10.5006/MP2018_57_11-3210.5006/MP2018_57_11-32 ↗
19. 10.5006/135410.5006/1354 ↗
20. 10.1021/es015886110.1021/es0158861 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.01510.1016/j.ijggc.2012.06.015 ↗
22. 10.1080/1478422X.2019.159173710.1080/1478422X.2019.1591737 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.02810.1016/j.ijggc.2015.12.028 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10852110.1016/j.corsci.2020.108521 ↗
25. 10.5006/366310.5006/3663 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.09.01510.1016/j.corsci.2015.09.015 ↗
27. 10.3390/su1004092310.3390/su10040923 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0010-938X(98)00180-210.1016/S0010-938X(98)00180-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.06310.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.063 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.05.00410.1016/j.elecom.2016.05.004 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.18910.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.189 ↗
32. 10.1039/C7RA10120A10.1039/C7RA10120A ↗
33. 10.1021/ie060386810.1021/ie0603868 ↗
34. 10.1021/ie00104a02310.1021/ie00104a023 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.00510.1016/j.ijggc.2016.09.005 ↗
36. 10.1021/i100010a01610.1021/i100010a016 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ctta.2021.10001710.1016/j.ctta.2021.100017 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.susc.2004.06.21010.1016/j.susc.2004.06.210 ↗
39. 10.1021/ie900474910.1021/ie9004749 ↗
40. 10.4152/pea.202240030310.4152/pea.2022400303 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5c0052710.1021/acs.iecr.5c00527 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.03810.1016/j.cej.2018.06.038 ↗
43. 10.1002/apj.7011110.1002/apj.70111 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.10418610.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104186 ↗