Effect of hot extrusion on AZ91 alloy corrosion behaviour
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of hot extrusion on the corrosion behavior of AZ91 alloy was studied by observing the change of grain size, the size and distribution of precipitated phase on the transverse and longitudinal sections before and after extrusion. The results show that the grain refinement of alloy was significant after extrusion, the grain size of the transverse section was uniform, that of the longitudinal section was different and the parallel streamline of shear stripes appeared. After extrusion, the decrease of the β-Mg17Al12 phase size reduces the relative potential difference between the second phase and the α-Mg matrix; the reduction of the transverse section was particularly significant. Grain refinement and precipitate size reduction after extrusion can improve the corrosion resistance of the AZ91 Mg alloy, which is the reason why the corrosion resistance of the transverse section was better than that of the longitudinal section.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Film and Coating, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu J · Mater Eng · 2018 · 46 · 73
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.00110.1016/j.msea.2017.01.001 ↗
3. Chang H · J Compos Mater · 2017 · 34 · 611
4. 10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00780-410.1016/S0924-0136(01)00780-4 ↗
5. Chen ZH. Deformed magnesium alloy. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press; 2005; 239–248.
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.06510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.065 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00410-510.1016/S0167-577X(03)00410-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.07410.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.074 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.01810.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.018 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.corsci.2008.04.01010.1016/j.corsci.2008.04.010 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)64039-010.1016/S1003-6326(15)64039-0 ↗
12. 10.1179/147842209X1255942816780510.1179/147842209X12559428167805 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.08410.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.084 ↗
14. Jin JB · J Metal · 2006 · 42 · 1014
15. 10.1149/1.183863310.1149/1.1838633 ↗
16. 10.1149/1.135919910.1149/1.1359199 ↗
17. 10.5006/143210.5006/1432 ↗
18. Zhang X. · 2013
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.01010.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.010 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20031040510.1002/adem.200310405 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.06010.1016/j.msea.2003.08.060 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0010-938X(98)00121-810.1016/S0010-938X(98)00121-8 ↗
23. Zhang M · 1983
24. Li X. · 2018
25. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.01810.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.018 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.02110.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.021 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.01210.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.06.012 ↗
28. Ding YF. · 2019
29. Chen C · Chin J Nonferr Met · 2013 · 6 · 1489