Investigation of anti-corrosion performance of ZIF-8/Zn(OH)F composite films on Zn–Al coating
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the corrosion resistance of ZIF-8/Zn(OH)F composite films with different molar ratios on Zn–Al coatings, emphasising the enhancement in their anti-corrosion properties. ZIF-8/Zn(OH)F composite films with molar ratios of 1:4, 1:8 and 1:16 were prepared using the ligand exchange method. Analysis through XRD, SEM and electrochemical corrosion tests revealed that the composite film with a 1:8 molar ratio exhibited the best corrosion resistance, enhancing the protection efficiency of the Zn–Al coating by over 94.6%. After 120 h of immersion in a 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution, the 1:8 molar ratio composite film exhibited a charge transfer resistance of 19,580 Ω.cm 2 and the lowest corrosion current density of only 2.32 × 10 −5 A/cm 2 . The study results suggest that the 1:8 molar ratio ZIF-8/Zn(OH)F composite film not only effectively enhances the corrosion resistance of Zn–Al coatings but also offers new insights into the design of anti-corrosion materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China University of Mining and Technology
FAW-Volkswagen Automotive Co., Ltd
Taiyuan University of Technology
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.09510.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.03.095 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11665-023-07889-310.1007/s11665-023-07889-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.06510.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.065 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.63210.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.632 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.10910.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.109 ↗
6. 10.2320/matertrans.C-M202182110.2320/matertrans.C-M2021821 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.12929210.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129292 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.09.05210.1016/j.jiec.2022.09.052 ↗
9. 10.1049/mna2.1212110.1049/mna2.12121 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.6b1684810.1021/acsami.6b16848 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.1c0475210.1021/acsami.1c04752 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2020.10960010.1016/j.jfluchem.2020.109600 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.06910.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.069 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jre.2019.01.00210.1016/j.jre.2019.01.002 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0279910.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02799 ↗
16. 10.1073/pnas.060243910310.1073/pnas.0602439103 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.11.02010.1016/j.micromeso.2017.11.020 ↗
18. 10.1002/aenm.20210051410.1002/aenm.202100514 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.10810.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.108 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.15610.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.156 ↗
21. 10.1134/S207020512003030210.1134/S2070205120030302 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.06.02510.1016/j.corsci.2018.06.025 ↗