journal article·2017-07-04

The effect of carbon within corrosion pits of iron in chloride solutions

Weichen Xu, Trevor Rayment, Alison Davenport

Publisher page

Abstract

Iron artificial pits have been used in this work to investigate the effect of a carbon-based black layer that can form within a pit during iron dissolution in HCl solutions. Commercial purity iron (99.5%) and high purity iron (99.99+%) have been compared, and a black layer has been observed only in the 99.5% iron pit. It has been found that the formation of a black layer within an iron artificial pit is potential dependent: it can form at applied voltages below 0.2 V(SCE), but not at 0.6 V(SCE). The presence of a black layer can decrease the rate of mass transport inside a pit, which may help to maintain the aggressive acidic solution in an active pit. This effect has been characterised quantitatively via potentiostatic and potential step methods. In addition, the black layer has also been found to induce a small extra resistance in the solution.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China

School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Diamond Light Source Ltd, Oxfordshire, UK

School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Funding

School of Metallurgy and Materials · China Scholarship Council · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.04.02010.1016/j.corsci.2009.04.020 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.00810.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/0010-938X(75)90013-X10.1016/0010-938X(75)90013-X ↗
4. 10.20964/2016.06.7810.20964/2016.06.78 ↗
5. Kawaley G · 2008
6. 10.1149/2.0591506jes10.1149/2.0591506jes ↗
7. Mi N · 2013
8. 10.1149/1.183817310.1149/1.1838173 ↗
9. 10.1002/1521-4176(200210)53:10<740::AID-MACO740>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/1521-4176(200210)53:10<740::AID-MACO740>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
10. 10.5006/0010-9312-24.3.6610.5006/0010-9312-24.3.66 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0013-4686(01)00561-810.1016/S0013-4686(01)00561-8 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.05.02510.1016/j.corsci.2010.05.025 ↗
13. 10.5006/1.329354810.5006/1.3293548 ↗
14. 10.5006/1.328058610.5006/1.3280586 ↗
15. 10.1002/aic.69032060510.1002/aic.690320605 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0010-938X(66)80033-110.1016/S0010-938X(66)80033-1 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.213403910.1149/1.2134039 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.206946710.1149/1.2069467 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0010-938X(97)00049-810.1016/S0010-938X(97)00049-8 ↗
20. 10.1149/1.209597410.1149/1.2095974 ↗
21. 10.1149/1.273666210.1149/1.2736662 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.205613710.1149/1.2056137 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.09.02410.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.09.024 ↗
24. 10.1149/1.213285710.1149/1.2132857 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.183861510.1149/1.1838615 ↗
26. 10.1149/1.212004810.1149/1.2120048 ↗
27. 10.5006/1.358388010.5006/1.3583880 ↗