Non-destructive techniques for corrosion detection: A review
Source abstract
Abstract
Corrosion detection (CD) has become a high priority in chemical industries, defense and transportation sectors to extend the life of existing or new systems while ensuring the safety of the existing components and reducing downtime to minimise economic losses. Here, this article is aimed to review and discuss non-destructive techniques used widely in the industry to detect, monitor and repair corrosion problems early on. The comprehensive review provides a detailed discussion, a functional mechanism, advantages and disadvantages of crucial non-destructive CD techniques widely used in the industry, helping the reader choose the type of corrosion monitoring methods effectively. An extensive literature review of visual and optical testing techniques, acoustic emissions, eddy current, guided wave and equipment, infrared thermography, radiographic, microwave and millimeter wave, and terahertz imaging is discussed. The underlying mechanism, its merits and limitations, along with the usage scenario, is explained that can be related across different areas making it interdisciplinary research for corrosion monitoring techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sherwin-Williams, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Worley Group Inc, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA
Applied Materials Inc., CA, USA
Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Koch G, Varney J, Thompson N, et al. International measures of prevention, application, and economics of corrosion technologies study. In: NACE International 2016 Conference Proceeding , Dublin, Ohio and APQC, Houston, Texas, USA, 2016.
2. 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.00710.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.03710.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.037 ↗
4. Agarwala VS · 2000
5. 10.1016/B978-1-4377-3455-3.00004-310.1016/B978-1-4377-3455-3.00004-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2003.09.02810.1016/j.jelechem.2003.09.028 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-1-4757-4825-3_110.1007/978-1-4757-4825-3_1 ↗
8. Rajendran S · 2020
9. Laboratory NCE · 1985
10. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.09.00110.1016/j.corsci.2009.09.001 ↗
11. Inc, G. S. S. Corrosion types and prevention. https://www.gibsonstainless.com/types-of-corrosion.html (accessed 1 August).
12. Litmited OU. Different types of corrosion. https://oxyplastuk.com/technical/different-types-of-corrosion/ (accessed 1 August).
13. Hare C · J Prot Coat Linings · 1998 · 15
14. Roberge PR · 2019
15. Zaidan B · Int J Comp Sci Issues (IJCSI) · 2010 · 7 · 33
16. Kania R, Carroll LB. Non-destructive techniques for measurement and assessment of corrosion damage on pipelines. In: International Pipeline Conference, 1998, Calgary, Alberta, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 309–313.10.1115/IPC1998-2037 ↗
17. 10.3390/s15081906910.3390/s150819069 ↗
18. 10.2172/97345810.2172/973458 ↗
19. Drury CG, Watson J. Good practices in visual inspection. Human factors in aviation maintenance-phase nine, progress report, FAA/Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance 2002.
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000080210.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000802 ↗
21. 2013
22. 10.1117/12.21353310.1117/12.213533 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_5810.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_58 ↗
24. Liu Z · IEEE Trans Instrum Meas · 2008 · 58 · 416
25. Buschinelli PD · Int Soc Optics Photonics · 2013 · 87881H
26. 10.1364/OE.8.00064910.1364/OE.8.000649 ↗
27. 10.1002/978111898773510.1002/9781118987735 ↗
28. 10.2172/1016095710.2172/10160957 ↗
29. Schubert F · J Acoust Emiss · 2004 · 22 · 147
30. 10.5006/0010-9312-32.4.12110.5006/0010-9312-32.4.121 ↗
31. 10.1002/047009976310.1002/0470099763 ↗
32. Ghali E · 2007
33. Mathiesen T · 2014
34. TEC-SCIENCE Dye penetrant inspection (DPI). https://www.tec-science.com/material-science/material-testing/dye-liquid-penetrant-inspection-dpi/ (accessed August 1st).
35. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.00910.1016/j.corsci.2013.11.009 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.35510.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.355 ↗
37. Lovejoy M · 2012
38. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.02.01510.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.02.015 ↗
39. 10.1016/0963-8695(90)91003-710.1016/0963-8695(90)91003-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10213410.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102134 ↗
41. 10.1518/00187209877948046010.1518/001872098779480460 ↗
42. Bardal E · Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · 3
43. Forsyth DS. Non-destructive testing for corrosion. Corrosion Fatigue and Environmentally Assisted Cracking in Aging Military Vehicles (RTO-AG-AVT-140) 2011.
44. 10.1088/0957-0233/17/9/01110.1088/0957-0233/17/9/011 ↗
45. Stultz SC. Heat-recovery steam generators: New tools for locating pitting, wall loss, corrosion, cracking in headers, tubes, welds. https://www.ccj-online.com/heat-recovery-steam-generators-new-tools-for-locating-pitting-wall-loss-corrosion-cracking-in-headers-tubes-welds/ (accessed August 7th).
46. Gowatski S. ASNT Crack Detection Paper. https://testex-ndt.com/articles/asnt-crack-detection-paper/ (accessed August 7th).
47. 10.1515/corrrev-2018-002210.1515/corrrev-2018-0022 ↗
48. 10.1117/12.14393810.1117/12.143938 ↗
49. Komorowski J, Krishnakumar S, Gould R, et al. Double pass retroreflection for corrosion detection in aircraft structures. Corrosion Detection and Management of Advanced Airframe Materials 1995.
50. 10.1002/9780470099766.ch210.1002/9780470099766.ch2 ↗
51. Heida J, Bruinsma A. D-sight technique for rapid impact damage detection on composite aircraft structures. 1997, pp. 1–12.
52. 10.1117/12.35839410.1117/12.358394 ↗
53. Liu Z, Forsyth D, Marincak A, et al. Automated measurement of corrosion damage using edge of light technique. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2004, pp. 1347–1354: American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.1711772 ↗
54. 10.1109/TIM.2008.200331210.1109/TIM.2008.2003312 ↗
55. Liu Z · Int Soc Optics Photonics · 2005 · 157
56. Forsyth D · Can Aeronaut Space J · 1997 · 43 · 231
57. 10.1007/978-4-431-55072-3_210.1007/978-4-431-55072-3_2 ↗
58. 10.1533/9780857093554.1.1210.1533/9780857093554.1.12 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.01410.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.014 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.02010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.020 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.01110.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.011 ↗
62. 10.1520/STP17435S10.1520/STP17435S ↗
63. Birring-Singh A, Rowland S, Burkhardt G. Detection of corrosion in aluminum aircraft structures. Final Report, Project (17-9366).
64. Rodgers J, Moore S. The use of acoustic emission for detection of active corrosion and degraded adhesive bonding in aircraft structure ; Sacramento, California, USA: SACRAMENTO AIR LOGISTICS CENTER MCCLELLAN AFB CA: 1975.
65. Scott I. Acoustic emission and corrosion. In: World Conference on non-destructive Testing, 9 th, Melbourne, Australia, 1980, p.4.
66. Fenn R · Nondestruct Test Eval · 1986 · 2 · 169
67. 10.5006/0010-9312-35.12.54110.5006/0010-9312-35.12.541 ↗
68. Parry D. Detection of corrosion pitting in pipelines using acoustic emission technology. Nondestructive Evaluation , 14 th 1983, 388–402.
69. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.05.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2007.05.003 ↗
70. 10.1016/0010-938X(93)90042-F10.1016/0010-938X(93)90042-F ↗
71. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000014410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000144 ↗
72. 10.1155/2014/82713010.1155/2014/827130 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.03.00710.1016/j.ultras.2013.03.007 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.01610.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.016 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.01210.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.012 ↗
76. 10.1007/s12541-009-0019-y10.1007/s12541-009-0019-y ↗
77. 10.1063/1.478921010.1063/1.4789210 ↗
78. Lambert T. In Further analysis of data generated in the EPRI round robin on IGSCC sizing , Non-destructive examination for pressurised components. Proceedings of the 3. international seminar on'Non-destructive examination in relation to structural integrity'held in Monterey, California, USA, 30–31 August 1983, in conjuction with the 7. international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology, 1984.
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.08410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.084 ↗
80. 10.1109/MINES.2012.24510.1109/MINES.2012.245 ↗
81. Zou F · 2017
82. 10.1007/978-3-319-69233-3_210.1007/978-3-319-69233-3_2 ↗
83. Rannou G · 2010
84. Hagemaier D · Mater Eval · 1982 · 40 · 682
85. Jarvis A, Cegla F, Bazaz H, et al. Ultrasonic monitoring of pitting corrosion. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, 2013, pp. 1433–1440: American Institute of Physics.10.1063/1.4789210 ↗
86. Iddings F · 1989
87. Latimer PJ. Method for ultrasonic detection of hydrogen damage in boiler tubes. Google Patents: 1987.
88. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.08.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2011.08.007 ↗
89. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3706-5_1710.1007/978-1-4613-3706-5_17 ↗
90. Goebbels K · Res Technol NDT · 1980 · 4 · 87
91. 10.1142/632710.1142/6327 ↗
92. 10.1109/JSEN.2012.218428010.1109/JSEN.2012.2184280 ↗
93. Smith RA, Hugo GR. In Deep corrosion and crack detection in aging aircraft using transient Eddy current NDE , Proc. 5th Joint NASA/FAA/DoD Aging Aircraft Conference, 2001.
94. 10.1088/0957-0233/18/11/02110.1088/0957-0233/18/11/021 ↗
95. Shanks D, Leeson R, Blaga C, et al. Methodology to develop fitness-for-service assessments for crack detection in-line inspection data. In: International Pipeline Conference, 2006, pp. 825–830.10.1115/IPC2006-10537 ↗
96. 10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00142-010.1016/S0360-8352(02)00142-0 ↗
97. 10.1784/insi.2018.60.10.56110.1784/insi.2018.60.10.561 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2016.02.001 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.06.01610.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.06.016 ↗
100. Sophian A · Insight · 2001 · 43 · 302