journal article·2026-01-21Open access

Additive Manufacturing of Gradient Stiffness Honeycombs Using Thermoplastic Polyurethane Composite Material Variations

Savvas Koltsakidis, Konstantinos Tsongas, Dimitrios Tzetzis

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 2

Abstract

Gradient stiffness structures are gaining attention for their energy absorption characteristics. This article explores an approach to designing honeycomb structures with gradient stiffness achieved through material variations in porous, solid, and carbon fiber (CF)‐reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Unlike conventional methods using thickness variation, the gradient stiffness is engineered by varying TPU composition within the honeycomb. Using a dual‐head 3D printer, one head dispensed TPU with a chemical blowing agent for porous and solid TPU, while the other extruded CF‐reinforced TPU. Tensile testing and scanning electron microscopy are employed to characterize stiffness variations and microstructure of the materials. Gradient honeycombs with up to three stiffness levels are fabricated by alternating print heads and adjusting temperatures. Compression tests are conducted at a strain rate of 0.025 s −1 , incorporating digital image correlation, to generate stress–strain curves, which highlighted unique densification and plateau regions. Honeycombs made entirely of CF‐reinforced TPU excelled at absorbing energy at stresses above 0.2 MPa, whereas porous TPU structures performed best at lower stresses. Gradient stiffness honeycombs exhibited superior densification strains, reaching up to 59%, compared to nongradient counterparts (48%–52%). CF TPU demonstrated the highest specific energy absorption value of 0.09 J cm −3 , while the honeycomb structure made from porous TPU showed the lowest at 0.02 J cm −3 up to the densification point. Gradient stiffness honeycombs exhibited values ranging from 0.028 to 0.077 J cm −3 . However, when subjected to varying application stresses, these gradient structures display favorable energy absorption performance across a broader range of stress conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Digital Manufacturing and Materials Characterization Laboratory School of Science and Technology International Hellenic University Thessaloniki 57001 Greece

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management School of Engineering International Hellenic University Thessaloniki 57001 Greece

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/jcs605013310.3390/jcs6050133 ↗
2. 10.1557/mrs.2015.27810.1557/mrs.2015.278 ↗
3. Belingardi G. · 2013
4. 10.1016/j.stam.2005.07.00710.1016/j.stam.2005.07.007 ↗
5. Jena S. · MOJ Appl. Bio. Biomech. · 2017 · 1 · 175
6. 10.1002/mawe.20140035610.1002/mawe.201400356 ↗
7. 10.1007/s40870-020-00284-210.1007/s40870-020-00284-2 ↗
8. 10.3139/120.11120110.3139/120.111201 ↗
9. 10.1088/1402-4896/aa694e10.1088/1402-4896/aa694e ↗
10. 10.1177/168781401882288010.1177/1687814018822880 ↗
11. 10.1186/s10033-019-0368-010.1186/s10033-019-0368-0 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.404819310.1115/1.4048193 ↗
13. Martinez F. C. · DYNA : Ingenieria e Industria · 2023 · 98 · 1010.6036/10778 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.02.02910.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.02.029 ↗
15. I. E.Khadiri M.Zemzami N.Hmina M.Lagache S.Belhouideg in2021 7th Inter. Conf. on Optimization and Applications (ICOA)IEEE Wolfenbüttel Germany2021 pp.1–4.10.1109/ICOA51614.2021.9442628 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.030 ↗
17. 10.3390/jcs502006210.3390/jcs5020062 ↗
18. 10.1051/matecconf/20203180104910.1051/matecconf/202031801049 ↗
19. Mansour M. T. · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 564 · 012015
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10939310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109393 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.05.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.05.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.01110.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.011 ↗
23. S. R. G.Bates I. R.Farrow R. S.Trask inProc. SPIE 9799 Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated SystemsSPIE — The International Society for Optics and Photonics Bellingham Washington USA2016 p.979907.
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10893010.1016/j.matdes.2020.108930 ↗
25. 10.1089/3dp.2022.019610.1089/3dp.2022.0196 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.007 ↗
27. X.Sun C.Cai R. P.Adams S.Rusinkiewicz inProc. of the 8th ACM Symp. on Computational Fabrication (SCF '23) Association for Computing Machinery New York NY USA2023 Vol.5 pp.1–8.10.1145/3623263.3623364 ↗
28. 10.1002/adem.20220168110.1002/adem.202201681 ↗
29. Xiuhui H. · Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. · 2021 · 53 · 1940
30. 10.1177/095440622091243710.1177/0954406220912437 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.02410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.06.024 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10647510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106475 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.01.00210.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.01.002 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10874510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108745 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.15410.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.154 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.00210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.002 ↗
37. 10.1177/109963621350909910.1177/1099636213509099 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.01910.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.019 ↗
39. Klempner D. · 2004
40. 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.04.00410.1016/j.supflu.2019.04.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.09810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.098 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.8b0102610.1021/acsami.8b01026 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.01110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.07.011 ↗
44. 10.1002/1439-2054(20001201)284:1<35::AID-MAME35>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/1439-2054(20001201)284:1<35::AID-MAME35>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
45. 10.1177/0021955X0708832610.1177/0021955X07088326 ↗
46. 10.1002/adem.20240201210.1002/adem.202402012 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10864410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108644 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsami.2c0207610.1021/acsami.2c02076 ↗
49. 10.3390/polym1304055610.3390/polym13040556 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.03.01410.1016/j.msec.2018.03.014 ↗
51. 10.3390/polym1310154110.3390/polym13101541 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.10851710.1016/j.polymertesting.2024.108517 ↗
53. 10.37358/MP.23.4.569410.37358/MP.23.4.5694 ↗
54. 10.3390/app13221214910.3390/app132212149 ↗
55. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.10.01810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.10.018 ↗
57. 10.1177/0021955X0606351910.1177/0021955X06063519 ↗
58. 10.1108/RPJ-06-2024-024110.1108/RPJ-06-2024-0241 ↗