journal article·2024-05Open access

Tensile and Low‐Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Laser Powder Bed Fused Inconel 718 at Room and High Temperature

Nadja Sonntag, Benjamin Piesker, Luis Alexander Ávila Calderón, Gunther Mohr, Birgit Rehmer, Leonardo Agudo Jácome, Kai Hilgenberg, Alexander Evans, Birgit Skrotzki

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 26· Issue 10

Abstract

This study investigates the room‐ and high‐temperature (650 °C) tensile and low‐cycle‐fatigue behavior of Inconel 718 produced by laser powder bed fusion (PBF‐LB/M) with a four‐step heat treatment and compares the results to the conventional wrought material. The microstructure after heat treatment is characterized on different length scales. Compared to the wrought variant, the elastic and yield properties are comparable at both test temperatures while tensile strength, ductility, and strain hardening capacity are lower. The fatigue life of the PBF‐LB/M variant at room temperature is slightly lower than that of the wrought material, while at 650 °C, it is vice versa. The cyclic stress response for both material variants is characterized by cyclic softening, which is more pronounced at the higher test temperature. High strain amplitudes (≥0.7%) at room temperature and especially a high testing temperature result in the formation of multiple secondary cracks at the transitions of regions comprising predominantly elongated grain morphology and columns of stacked grains with ripple patterns in the PBF‐LB/M material. This observation and pronounced crack branching and deflection indicate that the cracks are controlled by sharp micromechanical gradients and local crystallite clusters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Engineering Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) Unter den Eichen 87 Berlin 12205 Germany

Component Safety Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) Unter den Eichen 87 Berlin 12205 Germany

Non‐Destructive Testing Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und –prüfung (BAM) Unter den Eichen 87 Berlin 12205 Germany

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-319-58205-410.1007/978-3-319-58205-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11724010.1016/j.actamat.2021.117240 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
4. B.Merz K.Poka R.Nilsson G.Mohr K.Hilgenberg in Lasers in Manufacturing (LiM) 2023 WLT 1.
5. 10.1016/j.mser.2020.10059610.1016/j.mser.2020.100596 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10105110.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101051 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.08910.1016/j.msea.2016.05.089 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matchar.2019.01.02810.1016/j.matchar.2019.01.028 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.10110810.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101108 ↗
10. Schneider J. · J. Manuf. Mater. Process. · 2022 · 6 · 20
11. 10.1007/s10853-022-07499-910.1007/s10853-022-07499-9 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11661-022-06867-z10.1007/s11661-022-06867-z ↗
13. 10.3390/met1112189710.3390/met11121897 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.10.01410.1016/j.msea.2011.10.014 ↗
15. 10.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_281_29110.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_281_291 ↗
16. 10.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_545_55510.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_545_555 ↗
17. B.Rehmer F.Bayram L. A.Ávila Calderón G.Mohr B.Skrotzki. BAM reference data: Temperature‐dependent Young's and shear modulus data for additively and conventionally manufactured variants of Ni‐based alloy Inconel IN718. Zenodo 2023.10.1038/s41597-023-02387-6 ↗
18. ASTM F 3301a · 2018
19. SAE AMS 5663P · 2022
20. ASTM B 637 · 2018
21. ISO 6892‐1 · 2019
22. ISO 6892‐2 · 2018
23. ISO 12106 · 2017
24. DIN EN ISO 9513 · 2013
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14015410.1016/j.msea.2020.140154 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14222310.1016/j.msea.2021.142223 ↗
27. DIN ISO 13067 · 2021
28. 10.1002/adem.20220158110.1002/adem.202201581 ↗
29. 10.1002/adem.20230081910.1002/adem.202300819 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41597-023-02387-610.1038/s41597-023-02387-6 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.02810.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.028 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11024610.1016/j.matdes.2021.110246 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10848110.1016/j.matdes.2020.108481 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10187510.1016/j.addma.2021.101875 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10234710.1016/j.addma.2021.102347 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.13610.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.136 ↗
37. 10.1016/0001-6160(88)90139-310.1016/0001-6160(88)90139-3 ↗
38. 10.1007/BF0266739510.1007/BF02667395 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.11.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.11.023 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10559810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105598 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.09.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2019.09.010 ↗
42. Suresh S. · 2004
43. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10330110.1016/j.addma.2022.103301 ↗