Processing of a Large‐Scale Microporous Group on Copper Foil Current Collectors for Lithium Batteries Using Femtosecond Laser
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the thin thickness (≈8 μm) and soft nature of copper foil current collectors, it is extremely difficult to process large‐scale micro–nano holes on their surface. In this study, trepanning drilling of a copper foil current collector with a 1030 nm femtosecond laser system is investigated with emphasis on developing the processing technology of copper foil current collectors with different entry and exit sizes while maintaining good hole quality. The effects of laser parameters on the processing quality of copper foil current collectors are comprehensively studied. The relationship between geometric morphology and processing parameters as well as the formation mechanism is fully discussed. The smallest hole taper is found at a defocusing amount of −1.8 mm. Consequently, a group of holes with 250 000 micropores is obtained on a (2 cm × 2 cm) current collector, demonstrating the high efficiency and high quality of femtosecond laser‐based processing. Half‐cells with a modified current collector operate with a more stable response than half‐cells with unmodified copper foil at cycle performance and rate performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Battery Materials · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Intelligent Robots Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi 710049 China
State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering Xi'an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi 710049 China
School of Materials Engineering Shanghai University of Engineering Science Shanghai 201620 China
Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Laser Advanced Manufacturing Technology Shanghai 201620 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.00210.1016/j.rser.2018.03.002 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.04010.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.06010.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060 ↗
5. Kim T. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 7
6. 10.1007/s11581-007-0157-010.1007/s11581-007-0157-0 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20160140910.1002/adma.201601409 ↗
8. Ren J. · Acta Metall. Sin. · 2006 · 42 · 727
9. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.11.02210.1016/j.elecom.2006.11.022 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms905810.1038/ncomms9058 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.01.05010.1016/j.electacta.2008.01.050 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-017-13261-y10.1038/s41598-017-13261-y ↗
13. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.10581110.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.105811 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym1012139010.3390/polym10121390 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.03.01910.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.03.019 ↗
16. 10.1080/10584587.2016.116555510.1080/10584587.2016.1165555 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00339-017-0892-710.1007/s00339-017-0892-7 ↗
18. 10.1002/pssa.20170071910.1002/pssa.201700719 ↗
19. 10.1088/2631-7990/ab3a2410.1088/2631-7990/ab3a24 ↗
20. 10.1088/2631-7990/ab17f710.1088/2631-7990/ab17f7 ↗
21. 10.1088/2631-7990/ab0eda10.1088/2631-7990/ab0eda ↗
22. Zheng Y. · Proc. SPIE · 2016 · 9736 · 97361B10.1117/12.2220111 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10800-017-1086-x10.1007/s10800-017-1086-x ↗
24. 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62654-010.1016/S1003-6326(13)62654-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.05.00710.1016/j.optlastec.2016.05.007 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.02.02210.1016/j.optlastec.2019.02.022 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00170-015-7145-810.1007/s00170-015-7145-8 ↗
28. 10.1117/12.78246610.1117/12.782466 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.02010.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.020 ↗
30. 10.18063/msacm.v2i2.67210.18063/msacm.v2i2.672 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.01910.1016/j.optlastec.2018.12.019 ↗