Direct Ink Writing of Recycled Composites with Complex Shapes: Process Parameters and Ink Optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Within the complex framework of additive manufacturing, direct ink writing (DIW) processes significantly contribute to extending the range of 3D‐printable materials (i.e., thermosetting resins, ceramics, hydrogels). Thanks to this technology, viscous inks are easily extruded for the creation of 3D structures. Nevertheless, the quick recovery of the solid‐like behavior after extrusion remains one of the most crucial open issues for 3D‐printable inks. The main goal herein is to improve the printability of a UV‐curable thermosetting composite ink reinforced with mechanically recycled glass fiber composites by modifying its rheological behavior. The overall process is optimized, leading to the definition of the optimal extrusion parameters for these types of materials. Furthermore, the retraction mode is successfully developed for the DIW of recycled composites. Additional features are achieved, thanks to the aforementioned improvements, such as 3D complex shapes, assembled pieces, and/or moving built‐in mechanisms, increasing the number of new potential applications of recycled glass fiber‐reinforced polymers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Photopolymerization techniques and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta” Politecnico di Milano Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32 Milano 20133 Italy
Funding
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20170653910.1002/adma.201706539 ↗
2. 10.1002/advs.20200137910.1002/advs.202001379 ↗
3. 10.1108/RPJ-11-2018-029310.1108/RPJ-11-2018-0293 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10611410.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106114 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10833610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108336 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-020-05254-610.1007/s10853-020-05254-6 ↗
7. 10.1002/admt.20200007010.1002/admt.202000070 ↗
8. 10.1002/admt.20200003410.1002/admt.202000034 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mser.2020.10054310.1016/j.mser.2020.100543 ↗
10. 10.3390/nano1007130010.3390/nano10071300 ↗
11. 10.1002/smll.20160169510.1002/smll.201601695 ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20190045210.1002/admt.201900452 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20170703210.1002/adfm.201707032 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41598-017-06115-010.1038/s41598-017-06115-0 ↗
15. 10.3390/ma1307163610.3390/ma13071636 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10808810.1016/j.matdes.2019.108088 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.01410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.12.014 ↗
18. 10.1039/C7TC04873D10.1039/C7TC04873D ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.13910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10788710.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107887 ↗
21. 10.3390/ma1316354510.3390/ma13163545 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10853-020-05190-510.1007/s10853-020-05190-5 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.16810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.168 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.00910.1016/j.addma.2018.08.009 ↗
25. 10.3390/polym1209201410.3390/polym12092014 ↗
26. 10.1108/RPJ-01-2019-001110.1108/RPJ-01-2019-0011 ↗
27. 10.5281/zenodo.428344410.5281/zenodo.4283444 ↗
28. Macosko C. W. · 1994
29. 10.1002/adfm.20060043410.1002/adfm.200600434 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20140180410.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
31. Croom B. P. · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 37 · 101701
32. 10.1007/s11668-019-00631-z10.1007/s11668-019-00631-z ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.07210.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.072 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10361110.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103611 ↗
35. 10.5281/zenodo.428256410.5281/zenodo.4282564 ↗
36. 10.5281/zenodo.429890710.5281/zenodo.4298907 ↗
37. ASTM D3039 2017.
38. A.Romani A.Mantelli M.Levi inProc. of the 19th European Roundtable for Sustainable Consumption and Production – Circular Europe for Sustainability: Design Production and Consumption 2019 Book of Papers p.491.