journal article·2019-07-04

Corrosivity of atmosphere toward structural metals and mapping the continental Russian territory

Yulia Panchenko, Andrey Marshakov, Timofey Igonin, Ludmila Nikolaeva, Victoria Kovtanyuk

Publisher page

Abstract

The corrosivity of atmosphere in the continental territory of Russia toward carbon steel, zinc, copper and aluminium was determined and estimated. The atmosphere corrosivity was determined from experimental data on first-year corrosion losses in representative test locations. The atmosphere corrosivity was estimated using first-year corrosion losses of structural materials calculated by means of dose–response functions: new ones (DRFN) and those presented in ISO 9223 (DRFS). Estimation of atmosphere corrosivity in the Russian Federation (RF) territory was performed using the data bank of the Institute of physical chemistry and electrochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences containing long-term annual average meteorological atmosphere parameters. The mapping of RF continental territory by categories of atmosphere corrosivity is presented. The atmosphere corrosivities estimated by DRFN and DRFS for each metal are compared. It has been shown that DRFN provides more reliable atmosphere corrosivity estimates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Russian Academy of Sciences, A. N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Moscow, Russian Federation

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 1996
2. Feliu S · Progr Underst Prev Corros · 1993 · 1 · 1
3. Ignatova N. · 2000 · 63
4. Anshelm F · 2000 · 27
5. Rihm B · 2000 · 41
6. V Kucera, H-D Gregor, editors. Mapping air pollution effects on materials including stock at risk. Bull. 108E. Stockholm: Swedich Corrosion Institute; 2000. p. 63–72.
7. 1996
8. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.08110.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.081 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:101396913181810.1023/A:1013969131818 ↗
10. 10.3989/revmetalmadrid.103510.3989/revmetalmadrid.1035 ↗
11. 10.1023/A:102127410569710.1023/A:1021274105697 ↗
12. 10.3989/revmetalmadrid.103510.3989/revmetalmadrid.1035 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.220910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.2209 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.02510.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.025 ↗
15. 10.1117/1.JPE.2.02200310.1117/1.JPE.2.022003 ↗
16. 10.1179/1743278212Y.000000002610.1179/1743278212Y.0000000026 ↗
17. 10.1080/1478422X.2016.114426510.1080/1478422X.2016.1144265 ↗
18. 10.1080/1478422X.2016.127483910.1080/1478422X.2016.1274839 ↗
19. 10.1179/174327807X23470510.1179/174327807X234705 ↗
20. 10.1179/147842210X1269514903397210.1179/147842210X12695149033972 ↗
21. Panchenko YM · Zashch Met · 1982 · 18 · 575
22. 10.3390/ma1004042210.3390/ma10040422 ↗
23. 10.3934/matersci.2018.4.62410.3934/matersci.2018.4.624 ↗
24. Igonin TN · Korroziya mater zashchita · 2015 · 6 · 1