journal article·2015-05

Developing prepitting procedure for near neutral pH stress corrosion crack initiation studies on X-52 pipeline steel

Z. Shirband, R. L. Eadie, W. Chen, J. L. Luo, R. Kania, J. Been, G. Van Boven

Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, a procedure for prepitting of pipeline X-52 steel in the bicarbonate/carbonate solution was developed. Sodium chloride was added to the solution to induce pitting, and the optimum concentration of chloride ions, which produced a low density of pits, was found. The procedure briefly included prepassivation of the steel in the solution with optimum concentration of chloride ions and then increasing the potential above the pitting potential to generate pits. The potential was then stepped back well below the pitting potential to grow the pits to the desirable depth. This procedure can be used to generate pits on tensile specimens, which can be subsequently employed in near neutral pH stress corrosion crack initiation studies. This can result in shorter duration of crack initiation experiments under real loading condition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. National Energy Board (NEB): ‘Public enquiry concerning stress corrosion cracking on Canadian oil and gas pipelines’, Report no. MH-2-95, National Energy Board (NEB), Calgary, Alta., Canada, 18; 1996.
2. M. Baker, Jr. Inc. ‘Stress corrosion cracking study’, Final report, Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration Office of Pipeline Safety, Integrity management program delivery order no. DTRS56-02-D-70036, 20; 2005.
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.02410.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.024 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00133-010.1016/S0010-938X(01)00133-0 ↗
5. 10.1115/IPC2012-9008810.1115/IPC2012-90088 ↗
6. Eslami A. · Corros. Sci · 2010 · 5210.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.025 ↗
7. 10.1179/00070590010150101010.1179/000705900101501010 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11665-010-9631-310.1007/s11665-010-9631-3 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12613-011-0419-810.1007/s12613-011-0419-8 ↗
10. Eliyan F. F. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci · 2013 · 8 · 57810.1016/S1452-3981(23)14042-9 ↗
11. 10.1002/maco.1984035100210.1002/maco.19840351002 ↗
12. Frangini S. · Corros. Sci · 2003 · 4510.1016/S0010-938X(03)00102-1 ↗
13. 10.5006/1.327841510.5006/1.3278415 ↗
14. Li D. G. · Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 52
15. Frankel G. S. · J. Electrochem. Soc · 1998 · 14510.1149/1.1838615 ↗
16. Macdonald D. D. · J. Electrochem. Soc · 1992 · 13910.1149/1.2069096 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.03310.1016/j.corsci.2013.04.033 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.01.01210.1016/j.corsci.2014.01.012 ↗
19. 10.1002/aic.69032060510.1002/aic.690320605 ↗
20. Chen W. · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57
21. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.02.03210.1016/j.corsci.2014.02.032 ↗
22. 10.5006/1.328782410.5006/1.3287824 ↗