Powder‐Based Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Review of Materials, Methods, Opportunities, and Challenges
Source abstract
Abstract
As a 0D material, powder particles can be used to create almost any complicated engineering component by utilizing the high‐performance manufacturing capabilities of additive manufacturing (AM). Although powder‐based AM methods provide an outstanding practical value and development for modern manufacturing world, they continue to face challenges such as a lack of accessible categories, temperature restrictions, and poor performance of molded components. Therefore, researching for new AM materials and procedures has become an extremely necessary endeavor. For this purpose, a firm grasp of the current state of the art of powder‐based AM technologies is imperative. Hence, herein, a comprehensive review is presented on the most widely used powder‐based AM methods, and the materials used by these methods. For each method, the development and current state, operating principles, limitations, and future prospects are summarized. In contrast, for materials, their classifications, properties, and preparation methods are explored in great detail, while also commenting on the specific compatibilities between powder materials and powder methods. Industrial and commercialized applications of powder‐based AM are also presented in this work. Finally, the limitations of the current powder‐based technologies are highlighted, with comments regarding the future of this field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Northwest Composites Centre, Aerospace Research Institute, and Department of Materials Faculty of Science and Engineering The University of Manchester Oxford Road M13 9PL Manchester UK
Funding
Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00146-018-0809-910.1007/s00146-018-0809-9 ↗
2. Abeykoon C. · Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. · 2020 · 3 · 284
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10912110.1016/j.matdes.2020.109121 ↗
4. Wohlers Associates · 2022
5. Engineering Village - Quick Search https://www.engineeringvillage.com/search/quick.url(Accessed March 2023).
6. 10.1007/s00170-014-6334-110.1007/s00170-014-6334-1 ↗
7. Projects https://committee.iso.org/sites/tc261/home/projects.html(Accessed March 2023).
8. International Organization for Standardization/ ASTM InternationalAdditive manufacturing — General principles — Fundamentals and vocabulary (ISO/ASTM Standard No. 52900:2021(E)) Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-astm:52900:ed-2:v1:en.
9. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10096310.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100963 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11837-003-0175-y10.1007/s11837-003-0175-y ↗
12. 10.1108/1355254051057336510.1108/13552540510573365 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.493592610.1063/1.4935926 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.02210.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.022 ↗
16. 10.1108/1355254121121208710.1108/13552541211212087 ↗
17. 10.1186/s13036-015-0001-410.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62088-510.1016/S0007-8506(07)62088-5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.02710.1016/j.jmrt.2022.09.027 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10117610.1016/j.addma.2020.101176 ↗
21. 10.3390/polym1002016810.3390/polym10020168 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10063810.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2017.07.04410.1016/j.optlastec.2017.07.044 ↗
24. 10.1002/mame.20170021110.1002/mame.201700211 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00510.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10096910.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100969 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.04.001 ↗
29. Drummer D. · Addit. Manuf. · 2019 · 27 · 379
30. 10.1108/1355254951008684410.1108/13552549510086844 ↗
31. 10.1108/0144515031069865210.1108/01445150310698652 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.15410.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.154 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.oceram.2021.10007310.1016/j.oceram.2021.100073 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10073610.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100736 ↗
35. 10.1108/RPJ-11-2015-017810.1108/RPJ-11-2015-0178 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.05610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.056 ↗
37. 10.1039/D0RA01042A10.1039/D0RA01042A ↗
38. 10.1063/1.510640610.1063/1.5106406 ↗
39. 10.1243/09544054JEM112210.1243/09544054JEM1122 ↗
40. 10.1002/app.3032910.1002/app.30329 ↗
41. 10.1002/jbm.a.3162210.1002/jbm.a.31622 ↗
42. 10.1108/1355254091094342310.1108/13552540910943423 ↗
43. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.1610.3144/expresspolymlett.2021.16 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.04310.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.043 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.10.01910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.10.019 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.00110.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.001 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.06.02310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.06.023 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.491851610.1063/1.4918516 ↗
49. Meyers S. · 2015
50. 10.2174/9789815036336121010110.2174/97898150363361210101 ↗
51. B. A.Fulcher D. K.Leigh T. J.Watt Comparison of AlSi10Mg and Al 6061 Processed through DMLS University of Texas at Austin Austin TX2014 https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15695.
52. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.01910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.019 ↗
53. 10.1243/095440505X810910.1243/095440505X8109 ↗
54. 10.1557/jmr.2014.19410.1557/jmr.2014.194 ↗
55. 10.1002/pc.2494010.1002/pc.24940 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.00210.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.002 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.021 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.04.01610.1016/j.msec.2018.04.016 ↗
59. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1104014810.3390/pharmaceutics11040148 ↗
60. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab78ed10.1088/1758-5090/ab78ed ↗
61. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.12005910.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120059 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.11.007 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.04510.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.045 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.002 ↗
65. 10.3390/ma1416449610.3390/ma14164496 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10755210.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552 ↗
67. 10.3390/ma1102029810.3390/ma11020298 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10205810.1016/j.addma.2021.102058 ↗
69. Bartolomeu F. · Addit. Manuf. · 2017 · 16 · 81
70. 10.1063/1.493780910.1063/1.4937809 ↗
71. D. E.Bunnell S.Das D. L.Bourell J. B.Beaman H. L.Marcus inProc. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp. pp440–447 https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/69893.
72. 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.00410.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.004 ↗
73. B.Liu R.Wildman C.Tuck I.Ashcroft R.Hague inInte. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp. Proc.2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15290.
74. 10.1108/1355254121127202710.1108/13552541211272027 ↗
75. E.Santos K.Osakada M.Shiomi M.Morita F.Abe inFifth Inte. Symp. on Laser Precision Microfabrication Vol.5662 SPIE2004 pp.268–273 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.596317.10.1117/12.596317 ↗
76. 10.1007/s11665-019-04423-210.1007/s11665-019-04423-2 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.16510.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.165 ↗
78. 10.1007/s00170-011-3566-110.1007/s00170-011-3566-1 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.00410.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.004 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.04710.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.047 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.wear.2016.01.00410.1016/j.wear.2016.01.004 ↗
82. 10.1002/adem.20031009910.1002/adem.200310099 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.05110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.051 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.02410.1016/j.msec.2014.11.024 ↗
85. B.Wałpuski inPhotonics Applications in Astronomy Communications Industry and High-Energy Physics Experiments 2016 Vol.10031 SPIE2016 pp.147–153 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2249311.10.1117/12.2249311 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.01010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.010 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.07.02910.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.07.029 ↗
88. 10.1007/s11041-019-00350-010.1007/s11041-019-00350-0 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.07910.1016/j.phpro.2010.08.079 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.09310.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.093 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.03210.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.032 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.05210.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.052 ↗
93. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.423-426.83310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.423-426.833 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.05810.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.058 ↗
95. 10.1177/088532822092045710.1177/0885328220920457 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.05.00310.1016/j.mattod.2021.05.003 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.01.01810.1016/j.mattod.2013.01.018 ↗
98. 10.3390/ma1413360310.3390/ma14133603 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.05010.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.050 ↗
100. 10.1002/adem.20170084210.1002/adem.201700842 ↗