Extreme‐Value Statistics Reveal Rare Failure‐Critical Defects in Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing enables the rapid, cost effective production of customized structural components. To fully capitalize on the agility of additive manufacturing, it is necessary to develop complementary high‐throughput materials evaluation techniques. In this study, over 1000 nominally identical tensile tests are used to explore the effect of process variability on the mechanical property distributions of a precipitation hardened stainless steel produced by a laser powder bed fusion process, also known as direct metal laser sintering or selective laser melting. With this large dataset, rare defects are revealed that affect only ≈2% of the population, stemming from a single build lot of material. The rare defects cause a substantial loss in ductility and are associated with an interconnected network of porosity. The adoption of streamlined test methods will be paramount to diagnosing and mitigating such dangerous anomalies in future structural components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sandia National Laboratories PO Box 5800, Albuquerque 81785 NM USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering University of New Mexico Albuquerque NM 87131
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-510.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 ↗
2. 10.1089/3dp.2013.000210.1089/3dp.2013.0002 ↗
3. A. J.Duncan Quality control and industrial statistics 4th Edition Richard D. Irwin Homewood Illinois 1974.
4. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
5. 10.1115/1.402872510.1115/1.4028725 ↗
6. Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing ‐ General Principles ‐ Terminology ISO/ASTM 52900:2015(E). ASTM International West Conshohocken PA.2016.
7. 10.1108/1355254111115650410.1108/13552541111156504 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.02310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.10.023 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11661-999-0323-210.1007/s11661-999-0323-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.00410.1016/j.msea.2011.12.004 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0232140510.1007/BF02321405 ↗
12. 2015 · 60
13. 10.1016/0966-9795(96)00051-910.1016/0966-9795(96)00051-9 ↗
14. 10.6028/jres.119.01510.6028/jres.119.015 ↗
15. Weibull W. · J. Appl. Mech. − Trans. ASME · 1951 · 18 · 29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11340-009-9286-x10.1007/s11340-009-9286-x ↗
17. Ryan B. F. · 2001
18. Considere A. · Ann. Ponts Chaussees · 1885 · 9 · 574
19. 10.1016/0001-6160(77)90168-710.1016/0001-6160(77)90168-7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.05410.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.054 ↗
21. P.Kobryn S.Semiatin.Mechanical Properties of Laser‐Deposited Ti–6Al–4V. in Solid Freeform Fabrication Proc. Austin University of Texas2001.
22. 10.1115/1.273896210.1115/1.2738962 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.05610.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.056 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.005 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.014 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.05.002 ↗
27. 10.1108/1355254071077614210.1108/13552540710776142 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00339-009-5266-310.1007/s00339-009-5266-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00110.1016/j.addma.2014.08.001 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00210.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.81910.1103/PhysRevE.52.819 ↗
32. 10.1103/RevModPhys.64.96110.1103/RevModPhys.64.961 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R172410.1103/PhysRevA.46.R1724 ↗
34. 10.1098/rspa.2004.127910.1098/rspa.2004.1279 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.00410.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 ↗
36. 10.1364/AO.54.00247710.1364/AO.54.002477 ↗
37. A. R.Nassar E. W.Reutzel S. W.Brown J. P.Morgan D. J.Natale R. L.Tutwiler D. P.Feck J. C.Banks “ Sensing for directed energy deposition and powder bed fusion additive manufacturing at Penn State University ” Laser 3D Manuf. 9738 97380R (2016).10.1117/12.2217855 ↗
38. T.Craeghs S.Clijsters E.Yasa J.‐P.Kruth inProc. of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin TX Citeseer2011.
39. Spears T. G. · Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov · 2016 · 5 · 110.1186/s40192-016-0045-4 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00527-610.1016/S0921-5093(03)00527-6 ↗
41. 10.1143/JPSJ.12.121210.1143/JPSJ.12.1212 ↗
42. 10.1149/1.242562410.1149/1.2425624 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.01310.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013 ↗
44. 10.1007/s11837-998-0299-110.1007/s11837-998-0299-1 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00339-007-4159-610.1007/s00339-007-4159-6 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11837-998-0299-110.1007/s11837-998-0299-1 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.09910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
48. Rice R. C. · 2003
49. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.03210.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.032 ↗
50. Johnson N. L. · 2002
51. 10.1007/s11837-006-0223-510.1007/s11837-006-0223-5 ↗
52. Jared B. H. · 2017
53. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.021 ↗