Impact Testing of Polymer‐filled Auxetics Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, impact testing of auxetic structures filled with strain rate sensitive material is presented. Two dimensional missing rib, 2D re‐entrant honeycomb, and 3D re‐entrant honeycomb lattices are investigated. Structures are divided into three groups according to type of filling: no filling, low expansion polyurethane foam, and ordnance gelatine. Samples from each group are tested under quasi‐static loading and dynamic compression using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar. Digital image correlation is used for assessment of in‐plane displacement and strain fields. Ratios between quasi‐static and dynamic results for plateau stresses and specific energy absorption in the plateau are calculated. It is found out that not only the manufactured structures, but also the wrought material exhibit strain rate dependent properties. Evaluation of influence of filling on mechanical properties shows that polyurethane increases specific absorbed energy by a factor of 1.05–1.4, whereas the effect of gelatine leads to increase of only 5–10%. Analysis of the Poisson's function reveals influence of filling on achievable (negative) values of Poisson's ratio, when compared to unfilled specimens. The results for the Poisson's function yielded apparently different values as the assessed minima of quasi‐static Poisson's ratio in small deformations are constrained by a factor of 15.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanics and Materials Faculty of Transportation Sciences Czech Technical University in Prague Na Florenci 25 110 00, Prague Czech Republic
The Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Centre of Excellence Telč Batelovská 485 486, Telč, 588 56 Czech Republic
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20160005310.1002/adem.201600053 ↗
3. 10.1039/C6RA27333E10.1039/C6RA27333E ↗
4. L.Yang O.Harrysson H.West II D.Cormier 22nd Annual Int. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium − An Additive Manufacturing Conf. SFF The University of Texas at Austin USA2011 p.464.
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/05401410.1088/0964-1726/25/5/054014 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0055193910.1007/BF00551939 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:101860692609410.1023/A:1018606926094 ↗
8. 10.1002/pssb.20094551310.1002/pssb.200945513 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.01710.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.03310.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.033 ↗
13. 10.1002/pssb.20108421110.1002/pssb.201084211 ↗
14. 10.1088/1361-665X/26/2/02501310.1088/1361-665X/26/2/025013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.020 ↗
17. Lim T.‐C. · 2014
18. L.Yang D.Cormier O.Harrysson H.West InProc. of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp. The University of Texas at Austin USA2015 p.1394.
19. 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.05810.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.058 ↗
20. 10.1243/09544060232102938210.1243/095440602321029382 ↗
21. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/1/00610.1088/0964-1726/13/1/006 ↗
22. 10.1002/pssb.20138424910.1002/pssb.201384249 ↗
23. Yang L. · 2013 · 929
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.01710.1016/j.msea.2009.07.017 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11340-009-9305-y10.1007/s11340-009-9305-y ↗
26. 10.3390/ma901002710.3390/ma9010027 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.05410.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.054 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.10.02610.1016/j.msea.2014.10.026 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.02710.1016/j.msea.2012.10.027 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.05.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.03.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.03.014 ↗
32. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00269-X10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00269-X ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.00810.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.008 ↗
34. 10.1007/BF0241038510.1007/BF02410385 ↗
35. 10.5604/20815891.119519810.5604/20815891.1195198 ↗
36. S.Montabone Beginning Digital Image Processing: Using Free Tools for Photographers Apress New York USA2010 312 ISBN 978‐1‐4302‐2841‐7.https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐1‐4302‐2842‐4
37. 10.1007/BF0232140510.1007/BF02321405 ↗
38. Vendroux G. · Exp. Mech · 1998 · 38 · 1
39. Zhou P. · Opt. Eng · 2001 · 40 · 1
40. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2005.00227.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2005.00227.x ↗
41. Doktor T. · 2015
42. Koudelka P. · Mater. Technol · 2016 · 50 · 3
43. 10.1115/1.402974510.1115/1.4029745 ↗
44. 10.2320/matertrans.46.80510.2320/matertrans.46.805 ↗
45. K. K.Saxena E. P.Calius R.Das ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Vol.9 Mechanics of Solids Structures and Fluids; NDE Diagnosis and Prognosis ASME Phoenix Arizona USA2016.