Pummelos as Concept Generators for Biomimetically Inspired Low Weight Structures with Excellent Damping Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Natural materials often exhibit excellent mechanical properties. An example of outstanding impact resistance is the pummelo fruit (Citrus maxima) which can drop from heights of 10 m and more without showing significant outer damage. Our data suggest that this impact resistance is due to the hierarchical organization of the fruit peel, called pericarp. The project presented in the current paper aims at transferring structural features from the pummelo pericarp to engineering materials, in our case metal foams, produced by the investment casting process. The transfer necessitates a detailed structural and mechanical analysis of the biological model on the one hand, and the identification and development of adequate materials and processes on the other hand. Based on this analysis, engineering composite foam structures are developed and processed which show enhanced damping and impact properties. The modified investment casting process and the model alloy Bi57Sn43 proved to be excellent candidates to make these bio‐inspired structures. Mechanical testing of both the natural and the engineering structures has to consider the necessity to evaluate the impact of the different hierarchical features. Therefore, specimens of largely varying sizes have to be tested and size effects cannot be ignored, especially as the engineering structures might be upscaled in comparison with the natural role model. All in all, the present results are very promising: the basis for a transfer of bio‐inspired structural hierarchical levels has been set.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1098/rsif.2007.021810.1098/rsif.2007.0218 ↗
2. 10.1038/361511a010.1038/361511a0 ↗
3. T.Speck N. P.Rowe inProceedings of the 5th Plant Biomechanics Conference Vol. 1 (Ed: L. Salmén) STFI‐Packforsk Stockholm Sweden2006 p. 103.
4. 10.2495/DN10037110.2495/DN100371 ↗
5. R.Seidel A.Bührig‐Polaczek C.Fleck T.Speck inProceedings of the 6th Plant Biomechanics Conference(Ed: B. Thibaut) ECOFOG French Guyana France2009 p. 406.
6. 10.1086/33543410.1086/335434 ↗
7. Engler S. · 1981 · p. 63
8. 10.1007/BF0266668810.1007/BF02666688 ↗
9. Ashby M. F. · 2000 · p. 11
10. Fettweis D. · 2005 · p. 69
11. Salas G. F. · AFS Trans. · 2000 · 108 · 593
12. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00673-X10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00673-X ↗
13. 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-610.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-6 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.03410.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.034 ↗
15. DIN EN ISO 1798.
16. Product Information HEK MCP:http://www.mcp‐hek.de/pdf/mcp_leg/alloys.pdf
17. Hansen M. · 1958 · 336