Show source-provided references
4. Operando Investigation on the Role of Densification and Chemo‐Mechanics on Solid‐State Cathodes
10.1002/aenm.202304544 ↗6. Visualizing the Impact of the Composite Cathode Microstructure and Porosity on Solid‐State Battery Performance
10.1149/1945-7111/ad510e ↗10. Morphological Heterogeneity Impact of Film Solid‐State Cathode on Utilization and Fracture Dynamics
10.1021/acsnano.5c06799 ↗14. Impact of the Solid Electrolyte Particle Size Distribution in Sulfide‐Based Solid‐State Battery Composites
10.1002/aenm.202302309 ↗16. Co‐Design of Active Material and Solid Electrolyte Particulate Phases in Solid‐State Battery Composite Electrodes
10.1021/acsami.5c10908 ↗18. Quantifying the Impact of Cathode Composite Mixing Quality on Active Mass Utilization and Reproducibility of Solid‐State Battery Cells
10.1002/aenm.202405405 ↗21. Understanding Charge Transfer Dynamics in Blended Positive Electrodes for Lithium‐Ion Batteries
24. Chemo‐Mechanical Expansion of Lithium Electrode Materials—On the Route to Mechanically Optimized All‐Solid‐State Batteries
10.1039/C8EE00907D ↗26. Phospho‐Olivines as Positive‐Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
10.1149/1.1837571 ↗27. Evolution of Structure and Lithium Dynamics in LiNi0.8${\rm LiNi}
0.8$Mn0.1${\rm Mn}
0.1$Co0.1${\rm Co}
0.1$O2${\rm O}_2$ (NMC811) Cathodes During Electrochemical Cycling
10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00140 ↗30. Synergistic Effect Between LiNi0.5${\rm LiNi}0.5$Co0.2${\rm Co}0.2$Mn0.3${\rm Mn}0.3$O2${\rm O}_2$ and LiFe0.15${\rm LiFe}0.15$Mn0.85${\rm Mn}0.85$PO4${\rm PO}_4$/C on Rate and Thermal Performance for Lithium Ion Batteries
32. A Reduced Order Electrochemical and Thermal Model for a Pouch Type Lithium Ion Polymer Battery with LiNix${\rm LiNi}_x$Mny${\rm Mn}_y$Co1−x−y${\rm Co}
1-x-y$O2${\rm O}_2$/LiFePO4${\rm LiFePO}_4$ Blended Cathode
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.090 ↗34. Operando EDXRD Study of All‐Solid‐State Lithium Batteries Coupling Thioantimonate Superionic Conductors with Metal Sulfide
10.1002/aenm.202002861 ↗36. Synchrotron Operando Depth Profiling Studies of State‐of‐Charge Gradients in Thick Li(Ni0.8${\rm Ni}
0.8$Mn0.1${\rm Mn}
0.1$Co0.1${\rm Co}
0.1$)O2${\rm O}_2$ Cathode Films
10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00983 ↗38. Phytic Acid Derived LiFePO4${\rm LiFePO}_4$ Beyond Theoretical Capacity as High‐Energy Density Cathode for Lithium Ion Battery
10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.006 ↗39. Comparison on Thermal Runaway and Critical Characteristics of Cylindrical Lithium‐Ion Batteries: A Review
10.1021/acs.chas.4c00121 ↗41. Navigating Battery Choices: A Comparative Study of Lithium Iron Phosphate and Nickel Manganese Cobalt Battery Technologies
10.1016/j.fub.2024.100007 ↗42. Surface Reconstruction and Chemical Evolution of Stoichiometric Layered Cathode Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries
10.1038/ncomms4529 ↗44. Irreversible Phase Transition Between LiFePO4${\rm LiFePO}_4$ and FePO4${\rm FePO}_4$ During High‐Rate Charge‐Discharge Reaction by Operando X‐ray Diffraction
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.077 ↗48. TOPAS and TOPAS‐Academic: An Optimization Program Integrating Computer Algebra and Crystallographic Objects Written in C++
10.1107/S1600576718000183 ↗