Electrochemical Hydrogen Separation and Recovery by Non‐Platinum Group Metal Anode Catalyst (α‐MoO 3 ) on High‐Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The high‐temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT‐PEMFC) is a promising, clean, and highly efficient method for hydrogen recovery from plasma pyrolysis assembly (PPA) effluent, which requires an efficient electrochemical hydrogen pumping assembly that can tolerate carbon monoxide and limit side reactions with acetylene. A Platinum Group Metal (PGM) catalyst yields good durability for PEMFCs but poses a challenge due to its high cost and low tolerance to toxic gases. Tremendous effort is needed to develop non‐PGM catalysts with improved performance, durability, and hydrogen recovery. In this work, we report a new mesoporous MoO 3 anode catalyst that exhibits dual activity of HER and HOR, a state‐of‐the‐art among Platinum (Pt)‐free anode materials. The MoO 3 catalyst displayed promising HER activity at a low overpotential of −120 mV vs RHE and showed comparable HOR activity (5.3 mW cm −2 ) with a platinum catalyst (8.8 mW cm −2 ), using Nafion and Celtec‐P membranes under H 2 /air conditions. In H 2 CO/C 2 H 2 /air conditions at 150°C, the MoO 3 catalyst displayed hydrogen recovery of 43% using Nafion. In 46 h, it exhibited a constant 2.3% recovery using Celtec‐P membrane, whereas the Pt‐catalyst decreased from 18 to 0.6%. The results indicate a sustainable and cost‐effective fuel cell system without compromising electrochemical efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut United States
Skyre.INC East Hartford Connecticut United States
Institute of Materials Science University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut United States
Funding
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Cohn E. M. · 2021
2. Vogt C. · 2019 · 188
3. 10.1002/chem.20190395210.1002/chem.201903952 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncomms1543710.1038/ncomms15437 ↗
5. 10.1134/S003602441307035210.1134/S0036024413070352 ↗
6. J.Matthey PGM Prices‐Price Charts;http://www.platinum.matthey.com/pgm‐prices/price‐charts(accessed: December 2025).
7. 10.1039/C9SE00460B10.1039/C9SE00460B ↗
8. U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi‐Year Program Plan; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington DC 2024 https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024‐05/hfto‐mypp‐fuel‐cell‐technologies.pdf(accessed: December 2025).
9. Toward platinum group metal‐free catalysts for hydrogen/air proton‐exchange membrane fuel cells
10. 10.1038/ncomms142710.1038/ncomms1427 ↗
11. 10.1039/C5EE02739J10.1039/C5EE02739J ↗
12. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0065710.1021/acsaem.9b00657 ↗
13. Du L. · 2021 · 1908232
14. 10.1016/0021-9517(92)90084-U10.1016/0021-9517(92)90084-U ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.10.02410.1016/j.mattod.2019.10.024 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15192010.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151920 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.11.01710.1016/j.apcata.2007.11.017 ↗
18. Tailoring the Porosity of MOF‐derived N‐doped Carbon Electrocatalysts for Highly Efficient Solar Energy Conversion
19. 10.1002/advs.20170060110.1002/advs.201700601 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11051-021-05236-y10.1007/s11051-021-05236-y ↗
21. 10.3390/min1004037710.3390/min10040377 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.12.03210.1016/j.ssi.2003.12.032 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apmt.2015.08.00110.1016/j.apmt.2015.08.001 ↗
24. 10.1039/C7TC04807F10.1039/C7TC04807F ↗
25. 10.1039/C9RA10873D10.1039/C9RA10873D ↗
26. 10.1002/pssc.20046178210.1002/pssc.200461782 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja401390v10.1021/ja401390v ↗
28. 10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00185-210.1016/S0169-4332(97)00185-2 ↗
29. 10.1007/s42114-019-0075-410.1007/s42114-019-0075-4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.07710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.077 ↗
31. 10.1021/la960053n10.1021/la960053n ↗
32. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0368310.1021/acsnano.6b03683 ↗
33. 10.1073/pnas.171044311410.1073/pnas.1710443114 ↗
34. 10.1021/ja201269b10.1021/ja201269b ↗
35. 10.1039/C6SC00077K10.1039/C6SC00077K ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.02.065 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.04810.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.07.048 ↗
38. Effects of MEA Fabrication and Ionomer Composition on Fuel Cell Performance of PGM‐Free ORR Catalyst
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.073 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0180210.1021/acsaem.9b01802 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0577710.1021/acsomega.1c05777 ↗
42. Current Status and Future Development of Catalyst Materials and Catalyst Layers for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: an Industrial Perspective
43. 10.1038/s41598-018-38464-910.1038/s41598-018-38464-9 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23383510.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233835 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41560-021-00971-x10.1038/s41560-021-00971-x ↗
46. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.0021710.3389/fenrg.2020.00217 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.014 ↗
48. 10.1002/adfm.20201063310.1002/adfm.202010633 ↗
49. 10.1002/aenm.20220106310.1002/aenm.202201063 ↗
50. K.Murdoch R.Blanchard S.Mukerjee et al. “Closed Loop Hydrogen Recovery Enabled by Electrochemical Hydrogen Separation ” (TTU Libraries 2019).
51. 10.1038/s41563-020-00841-z10.1038/s41563-020-00841-z ↗
52. 10.1002/aenm.20160052810.1002/aenm.201600528 ↗
53. 10.1039/D1SC04775B10.1039/D1SC04775B ↗
54. 10.1016/j.memsci.2024.12243410.1016/j.memsci.2024.122434 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.energy.2007.07.00510.1016/j.energy.2007.07.005 ↗
56. 10.3390/catal1411078010.3390/catal14110780 ↗
57. 10.1007/s42154-021-00146-010.1007/s42154-021-00146-0 ↗
58. 10.1002/cssc.20250090510.1002/cssc.202500905 ↗
59. 10.1039/C8TA00447A10.1039/C8TA00447A ↗
60. 10.1002/adma.20230220710.1002/adma.202302207 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.07.01710.1016/j.electacta.2004.07.017 ↗