journal article·2017-11-01

Corrosion Resistances of Steel Pipes Internally Coated with Enamel

Liang Fan, Fujian Tang, Signo T. Reis, Genda Chen, Michael L. Koenigstein

Corrosion· Volume 73· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

The corrosion resistances of enamel-coated steel pipe in 3.5 wt% NaCl solution was evaluated and compared with those of epoxy-coated pipe using open-circuit potential, linear polarization resistance, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests. T-001c enamel slurry and GP2118 enamel powder were sprayed to steel pipe in wet and electrostatic processes, respectively. The phase composition and microstructures of the two enamels were characterized with x-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The surface roughness of enamels and their bond strength with steel substrates were quantified to understand coating quality. SEM images revealed that both types of enamel coatings have a solid structure with isolated bubbles. Electrochemical tests showed a high corrosion resistance of the enamel coatings as verified in visual inspection on the tested samples. In particular, the GP2118 enamel-coated samples consistently outperformed the epoxy-coated samples.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

*Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409-0030.

**Pro-Perma Engineered Coatings, Roesch, Inc., Belleville, IL 62226.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. “Corrosion Cost and Preventive Strategies in the United States,”
2. Crowe · Oil Gas J. · 1959 · 57 · 107
3. “The Benefits of Using Internal Plastic Coatings on Chrome Tubulars,”10.4043/16026-MS ↗
4. “Designing for Internally Coated Pipelines,”
5. “New Application Technology for Internal Pipeline Coatings in Situ Pipeline Protection Using Pigging Techniques,”10.5006/C2006-06061 ↗
6. “The Use of High Performance Polymeric Coatings to Mitigate Corrosion and Deposit Formation in Pipeline Applications,”10.5006/C2007-07028 ↗
7. Manning · Constr. Build. Mater. · 1996 · 10 · 34910.1016/0950-0618(95)00028-3 ↗
8. Rossi · Wear · 2015 · 332 · 70210.1016/j.wear.2015.01.058 ↗
9. Tang · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 59 · 15710.1016/j.corsci.2012.02.024 ↗
10. Tang · Constr. Build. Mater. · 2012 · 35 · 37610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.059 ↗
11. Tang · Cem. Concr. Compos. · 2013 · 35 · 17110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.08.009 ↗
12. “Standard Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings Using Portable Adhesion Tester”
13. Fan · Acta Metall. Sinica · 2017 · 30 · 39010.1007/s40195-017-0554-y ↗
14. Yang · Thin Solid Films · 2003 · 443 · 3310.1016/S0040-6090(03)00973-8 ↗
15. Liu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1992 · 149 · 21710.1016/0921-5093(92)90382-B ↗
16. “PosiTest AT Pull-Off Adhesion Testers Quick Guide v.5.0,”
17. Méndez-Vilas · 2012 · 1085
18. Zuo · Corros. Sci. · 2008 · 50 · 332210.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.049 ↗
19. Zhu · Electrochim. Acta · 2011 · 56 · 582810.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.068 ↗
20. Zhang · Prog. Org. Coat. · 2004 · 51 · 14510.1016/j.porgcoat.2004.08.001 ↗
21. Zhang · Prog. Org. Coat. · 2004 · 49 · 29310.1016/S0300-9440(03)00115-2 ↗
22. Walter · Corros. Sci. · 1986 · 26 · 68110.1016/0010-938X(86)90033-8 ↗
23. Presa · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2001 · 502 · 8210.1016/S0022-0728(00)00512-X ↗
24. Yao · Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 52 · 453910.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.052 ↗
25. Orazem · 2008 · 23310.1002/9780470381588.ch13 ↗
26. Tang · Electrochim. Acta · 2013 · 92 · 3610.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.125 ↗
27. Hirschorn · Electrochim. Acta · 2010 · 55 · 621810.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.065 ↗
28. Córdoba-Torres · Electrochim. Acta · 2012 · 72 · 17210.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.020 ↗
29. Hassan · Electrochim. Acta · 2007 · 52 · 635910.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.046 ↗