Leveraging Digital Advanced Manufacturing to Enable Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells With Ultrahigh Gravimetric Power Density
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The integration of hydrogen fuel cells into aerospace applications is limited by the weight and volume of fuel cell systems. Currently, bipolar plates account for 80 % of fuel cell stack mass and 60 % of its volume. Herein, we leverage a range of advanced manufacturing techniques to develop novel lightweight‐compact porous distributors with ultrahigh power densities. Research begins with a graphene‐coated nickel foam porous distributor, which enhances reactants transport and interfacial conductivity, achieving a power density of 1.52 W/cm 2 , ∼50 % improvement over conventional designs. To further boost gravimetric power density, titanium was adopted as a base material, and porous architectures were optimized using Computational Fluid Dynamics to ensure optimal reactant distribution and water management. To realize these porous titanium designs, two advanced manufacturing techniques were leveraged: laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and laser micromachining. While the optimized LPBF lattice structure reached 1.36 W/cm 2 , the laser‐patterned non‐homogeneous architecture demonstrated a breakthrough performance of 1.62 W/cm 2 , translating to volumetric and gravimetric power densities of over 10 kW/L and 9 kW/kg, respectively. These values surpass current commercial benchmarks and exceed EU/UK 2030 targets. We demonstrate how integrating digital design, flow control, advanced materials, and manufacturing enables lightweight, high‐power fuel cells, with broader impact on electrolyzers, heat exchangers, and batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemical Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
School of Aeronautical Automotive Chemical and Materials Engineering Loughborough University Loughborough Leicestershire UK
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-323-99485-9.00003-410.1016/B978-0-323-99485-9.00003-4 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.23676910.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236769 ↗
3. Development Of The Fuel Cell Stack For The Second‐Generation Mirai
4. Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking · 2018
5. Annex to GB decision no. CleanHydrogen‐GB‐2022‐02 · 2022
6. 2022
7. James B. D. · 2018
8. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23154310.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231543 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23357210.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233572 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.11110.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.111 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.etran.2020.10009010.1016/j.etran.2020.100090 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.02210.1016/j.joule.2018.03.022 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.02810.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.028 ↗
14. Z. A. Whitepaper · 2024
15. Integrated‐Channel Porous Transport Layers Reduce Ohmic And Mass Transport Losses In Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolyzers
16. 10.1002/aenm.20240230810.1002/aenm.202402308 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11844810.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118448 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00539 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41586‐021‐03482‐710.1038/s41586‐021‐03482‐7 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.14210.1016/j.renene.2020.04.142 ↗
21. 10.1002/smtd.20220153710.1002/smtd.202201537 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐51704‐z10.1038/s41467‐024‐51704‐z ↗
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.13480810.1016/j.electacta.2019.134808 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.12.00310.1016/j.joule.2023.12.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.33410.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.334 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.26310.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.263 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.23699710.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236997 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.energy.2025.13524010.1016/j.energy.2025.135240 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0009‐2509(02)00166‐510.1016/S0009‐2509(02)00166‐5 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.03110.1016/j.msea.2015.01.031 ↗
31. 10.1088/2631‐7990/ac94fa10.1088/2631‐7990/ac94fa ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.04910.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.049 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.12085810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120858 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00510.1016/j.addma.2018.01.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.28210.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.282 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.10.03910.1016/j.jmst.2022.10.039 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.12218610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122186 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.08610.1016/j.energy.2016.03.086 ↗
39. 10.1080/15435075.2024.234182510.1080/15435075.2024.2341825 ↗
40. 10.1007/s40243‐017‐0104‐610.1007/s40243‐017‐0104‐6 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0041710.1021/acsenergylett.4c00417 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.13110.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.131 ↗
43. 10.2351/7.000128410.2351/7.0001284 ↗
44. 10.1002/er.847810.1002/er.8478 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.renene.2025.12289710.1016/j.renene.2025.122897 ↗
46. 10.1002/smtd.20220125610.1002/smtd.202201256 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0201210.1021/acsenergylett.2c02012 ↗
48. 10.1002/advs.20240435010.1002/advs.202404350 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0311210.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03112 ↗
50. 2024
51. 10.1038/nmeth.201910.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
52. Tsotridis G. · 2015
53. 2022
54. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.23806610.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.238066 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.21010.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.210 ↗
56. 10.2514/6.2021-240910.2514/6.2021-2409 ↗