journal article·2016-05

Degradation of Sexithiophene Cascade Organic Solar Cells

Ludwig Bormann, Frederik Nehm, Nelli Weiß, Vasileios C. Nikolis, Franz Selzer, Alexander Eychmüller, Lars Müller‐Meskamp, Koen Vandewal, Karl Leo

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 6· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

The degradation of sexithiophene cascade organic solar cells is studied. Glass–glass encapsulated devices on indium tin oxide as transparent electrode show efficiencies of 6.6% and degrade within 500 h in illuminated 38 °C/50% RH climate. Fully flexible devices with silver nanowire electrode and alumina barrier achieve 5% efficiency and degrade within 30 h due to electrode failure. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institut für Angewandte Photophysik Technische Universität Dresden George‐Bähr‐Str. 1 01069 Dresden Germany

Physikalische Chemie Technische Universität Dresden Bergstraße 66b 01062 Dresden Germany

Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) ON Canada CA‐M5G 1Z8 Toronto

Funding

European Community's Seventh Framework Program

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncomms629310.1038/ncomms6293 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20150020410.1002/aenm.201500204 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.489301210.1063/1.4893012 ↗
4. 10.1021/jacs.5b0030510.1021/jacs.5b00305 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20140021610.1002/aenm.201400216 ↗
6. 10.1021/cm200525h10.1021/cm200525h ↗
7. 10.1021/nl501112z10.1021/nl501112z ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.5b1114910.1021/jacs.5b11149 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20130141310.1002/aenm.201301413 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms440610.1038/ncomms4406 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00206-010.1016/S0040-6090(99)00206-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.03110.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.031 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20110056610.1002/adma.201100566 ↗
14. Polinares EU Policy on Natural Resources 2012 Fact sheet: indium.http://www.polinares.eu/docs/d2‐1/polinares_wp2_annex2_factsheet5_v1_10.pdf Accessed: February 2016.
15. M.Buchert D.Schüler D.Bleher Critical Metals for Future Sustainable Technologies and Their Recycling Potential Institute for Applied Ecology 2009 http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1202xPA‐Critical%20Metals%20and%20their%20Recycling%20Potential.pdf Accessed date: February 2016.
16. 10.1002/adma.20100077510.1002/adma.201000775 ↗
17. 10.1039/C2NR32221H10.1039/C2NR32221H ↗
18. 10.1021/nn900348c10.1021/nn900348c ↗
19. 10.1039/C4TC01959H10.1039/C4TC01959H ↗
20. 10.1039/C3NR05820D10.1039/C3NR05820D ↗
21. 10.1166/jnn.2011.507510.1166/jnn.2011.5075 ↗
22. 10.1109/JSTQE.2004.82407210.1109/JSTQE.2004.824072 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.233877610.1063/1.2338776 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.483945510.1063/1.4839455 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20150104610.1002/adfm.201501046 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20120264610.1002/adfm.201202646 ↗
27. Kang S. · Nano Lett., ACS Nanolett. · 2015 · 5 · 793310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.09.03210.1016/j.orgel.2012.09.032 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.365697310.1063/1.3656973 ↗
30. 10.1021/nn305491x10.1021/nn305491x ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20110087110.1002/adma.201100871 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.10.00710.1016/j.orgel.2015.10.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.06.04710.1016/j.orgel.2012.06.047 ↗
34. 10.1021/am505704e10.1021/am505704e ↗
35. 10.1038/srep0478810.1038/srep04788 ↗
36. Cui H.‐F. · Opt. Eng. · 2014 · 53 · 077
37. In the case of using glass as top encapsulation the main moisture ingress takes place through the used epoxy glue. Additionally a getter is placed inside the cavity glass to keep as much water away from the sample as possible.
38. 10.1021/acsami.5b0689110.1021/acsami.5b06891 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20100266910.1002/adfm.201002669 ↗
40. M.Hermenau PhD Thesis TU Dresden2012.
41. 10.1063/1.242291110.1063/1.2422911 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.489443710.1063/1.4894437 ↗