Tellurene Polymorphs: A New Frontier for Solar Harvesting with Strong Exciton Anisotropy and High Optical Absorbance
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract By using ab initio simulations based on density functional theory and many‐body perturbation theory, a comprehensive analysis of the distinct optical signatures of various tellurene polymorphs and their associated unique anisotropic excitonic characteristics is presented. Despite the atomic thickness of these materials, these findings reveal that their optical absorbance reaches as high as 50% in the near‐infrared and visible range. This investigation highlights the exceptional potential of these 2D semiconducting materials in the development of ultra‐thin and flexible homo‐ and hetero‐junctions for solar light harvesting, achieving photoconversion efficiencies up to 19%, a performance level comparable to current silicon technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics University of Rome “Tor Vergata” and INFN Via della Ricerca Scientifica 1 00133 Rome Italy
Funding
Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca · Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn303815z10.1021/nn303815z ↗
2. 10.1021/nl401544y10.1021/nl401544y ↗
3. 10.1021/nn505736z10.1021/nn505736z ↗
4. 10.1021/jz500409m10.1021/jz500409m ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.1c1124510.1021/acsami.1c11245 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20140228810.1002/adfm.201402288 ↗
7. 10.1002/adfm.20160473310.1002/adfm.201604733 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-021-27195-710.1038/s41467-021-27195-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.10.05210.1016/j.optmat.2018.10.052 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20140164710.1002/smll.201401647 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.0c1557310.1021/acsami.0c15573 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.2c0868010.1021/acsami.2c08680 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn502776h10.1021/nn502776h ↗
14. 10.1038/s41598-022-15352-x10.1038/s41598-022-15352-x ↗
15. 10.1039/C9TA01219B10.1039/C9TA01219B ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-020-73152-710.1038/s41598-020-73152-7 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0563210.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05632 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9NR00421A10.1039/C9NR00421A ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15030410.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150304 ↗
20. 10.1007/s12274-014-0532-x10.1007/s12274-014-0532-x ↗
21. 10.1021/nl500935z10.1021/nl500935z ↗
22. 10.1088/2053-1583/1/2/02500110.1088/2053-1583/1/2/025001 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20230902310.1002/adma.202309023 ↗
24. 10.1002/smsc.20230027210.1002/smsc.202300272 ↗
25. Li G. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2024
26. 10.1039/D4TC00530A10.1039/D4TC00530A ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0102910.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01029 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41928-018-0058-410.1038/s41928-018-0058-4 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-020-16125-810.1038/s41467-020-16125-8 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0342410.1021/acsnano.8b03424 ↗
31. 10.1039/C7CP07906K10.1039/C7CP07906K ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.7b0996410.1021/jacs.7b09964 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8NR07501H10.1039/C8NR07501H ↗
34. 10.1103/PRXEnergy.3.01301310.1103/PRXEnergy.3.013013 ↗
35. 10.1039/C8CS00598B10.1039/C8CS00598B ↗
36. 10.1039/C9TA00280D10.1039/C9TA00280D ↗
37. 10.1088/1674-4926/41/8/08100210.1088/1674-4926/41/8/081002 ↗
38. 10.1039/D0TC02741C10.1039/D0TC02741C ↗
39. 10.1007/s40820-019-0337-210.1007/s40820-019-0337-2 ↗
40. 10.1039/D0NR07444F10.1039/D0NR07444F ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.10610110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.106101 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.scib.2018.01.01010.1016/j.scib.2018.01.010 ↗
43. 10.1039/C8MH00082D10.1039/C8MH00082D ↗
44. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.04010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.040 ↗
45. 10.1039/C7NR04085G10.1039/C7NR04085G ↗
46. 10.1039/C8NR09760G10.1039/C8NR09760G ↗
47. 10.1088/2053-1583/aae7f610.1088/2053-1583/aae7f6 ↗
48. 10.1021/nn502810410.1021/nn5028104 ↗
49. 10.1002/adfm.20170583310.1002/adfm.201705833 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0761810.1021/acsnano.9b07618 ↗
51. 10.1038/nnano.2015.11210.1038/nnano.2015.112 ↗
52. 10.1002/adfm.20150454610.1002/adfm.201504546 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0416510.1021/acsnano.6b04165 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0197710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01977 ↗
55. 10.1038/srep1589910.1038/srep15899 ↗
56. 10.1038/ncomms799110.1038/ncomms7991 ↗
57. 10.1038/nature1318410.1038/nature13184 ↗
58. 10.1038/ncomms547510.1038/ncomms5475 ↗
59. 10.1039/C9NR07820G10.1039/C9NR07820G ↗
60. 10.1039/C7NR09173G10.1039/C7NR09173G ↗
61. 10.1002/lpor.20210032210.1002/lpor.202100322 ↗
62. 10.3390/nano1214250310.3390/nano12142503 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.08540210.1103/PhysRevB.100.085402 ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c1052610.1021/acs.jpcc.1c10526 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.08513510.1103/PhysRevB.98.085135 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.505739510.1063/1.5057395 ↗
67. National Renewable Energy Laboratory http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5/(accessed: July 2023).
68. Bechstedt F. · 2016
69. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.18680210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.186802 ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.20540810.1103/PhysRevB.94.205408 ↗
71. 10.1039/C9NR05660B10.1039/C9NR05660B ↗
72. 10.3390/nano908107510.3390/nano9081075 ↗
73. 10.1039/C9NR04176A10.1039/C9NR04176A ↗
74. 10.1021/nl503799t10.1021/nl503799t ↗
75. Keldysh L. · Soviet J. Exp. Theoret. Phys. Lett. · 1979 · 29 · 658
76. N. S.Rytova arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.009762018.
77. 10.1209/0295-5075/98/3700410.1209/0295-5075/98/37004 ↗
78. 10.1002/pssb.20135040410.1002/pssb.201350404 ↗
79. 10.1038/s41598-020-67667-210.1038/s41598-020-67667-2 ↗
80. 10.1063/1.497375310.1063/1.4973753 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.23543110.1103/PhysRevB.98.235431 ↗
82. 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.08540410.1103/PhysRevB.103.085404 ↗
83. 10.1080/23746149.2018.154830510.1080/23746149.2018.1548305 ↗
84. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.25740210.1103/PhysRevLett.112.257402 ↗
85. 10.1021/jp512259610.1021/jp5122596 ↗
86. 10.1002/adma.20050171710.1002/adma.200501717 ↗
87. 10.1016/0038-1101(62)90115-610.1016/0038-1101(62)90115-6 ↗
88. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1097610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10976 ↗
89. The 2L α‐Te/1L β‐Te junction turns out to be unstable and relaxes in a simple 3L α‐Te at least for small commensurate unit cells and free‐standing calculations. However by playing with charge doping twist angles or strain [44] metastable structures with reduced quasi‐covalent interactions within the interface could result preventing the monolayer phase transition from beta to alpha in the heterostructure.
90. Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaics Research.https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/crystalline‐silicon‐photovoltaics‐research(accessed: August 2024).
91. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
92. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.60110.1103/RevModPhys.74.601 ↗
93. 10.1088/1361-648X/ab15d010.1088/1361-648X/ab15d0 ↗
94. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
95. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.01210.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.012 ↗
97. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
98. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.286710.1103/PhysRevB.25.2867 ↗
99. 10.1103/PhysRevB.21.465610.1103/PhysRevB.21.4656 ↗
100. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.58210.1103/PhysRevLett.33.582 ↗