journal article·2025-11Open access

Deconvoluting Degradation Mechanisms in Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis Using Operando X‐ray Microtomography

Iain Malone, Seçil Ünsal, R. S. Young, Matthew P. Jones, Francesco Spanu, Shashidhara Marathe, Rhodri Jervis, Hugh G.C. Hamilton, Christopher M. Zalitis, Thomas S. Miller, Alexander J.E. Rettie

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 15· Issue 44

Abstract

Abstract Anion exchange membrane water electrolysers are held back by the low durability of the ionomer in the membrane and catalyst layers. Studying ionomer degradation in these systems is challenging because the main mechanisms ‐ which result in catalyst detachment, membrane thinning, and loss of cationic functionality ‐ have opposing effects on the cell potential. Electrochemical measurements alone are therefore insufficient for elucidating the underlying causes of degradation. To address this, a bespoke miniature‐electrolyser‐cell is developed for X‐ray microtomography imaging of membrane electrode assemblies at 1.6 µm resolution. This setup enables the study of the entire active volume of the electrolyser under static and operando conditions and is validated against standard 5 cm 2 laboratory cells. An operando investigation of degradation in Fumasep‐based catalyst‐coated membranes reveals both significant membrane thinning and loss of membrane ionic conductivity during stability testing, leading to increased ohmic resistance and cell potential. In contrast, a Selemion membrane shows minimal changes in thickness and conductivity and is significantly more stable compared to Fumasep when exposed to synchrotron radiation. This platform has relevance for operando studies of electrochemical materials and devices generally, including proton exchange membrane electrolysers, fuel cells, and CO 2 electrolysers using both lab‐based and synchrotron X‐ray sources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrochemical Innovation Lab Department of Chemical Engineering University College London Torrington Place London WC1E 7JE UK

The Faraday Institution Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot OX11 0RA UK

Johnson Matthey Technology Centre Blounts Court Road, Sonning Common Reading RG4 9NH UK

Diamond Light Source Ltd Diamond House, Harwell Science & Innovation Campus Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0DE UK

Advanced Propulsion Lab Marshgate University College London London E20 2AE UK

Funding

Faraday Institution · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JPROC.2020.299225110.1109/JPROC.2020.2992251 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.11880310.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118803 ↗
3. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819424-9.00010-010.1016/B978-0-12-819424-9.00010-0 ↗
4. 10.1002/cite.20190010110.1002/cite.201900101 ↗
5. Hinkley J. · Cost Assessment of Hydrogen Production from PV and Electrolysis · 2016
6. 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.11616210.1016/j.enconman.2022.116162 ↗
7. Mayyas A. · NREL/TP‐6A20‐72740 · 2019
8. 10.1039/D1EE02642A10.1039/D1EE02642A ↗
9. Ionomr Innovations White Paper: Hydrogen Production Cost by AEM 2020.
10. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.18110.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.181 ↗
11. IEA ETP Clean Energy Technology Guidehttps://www.iea.org/data‐and‐statistics/data‐tools/etp‐clean‐energy‐technology‐guide(accessed: October 2024).
12. 10.1002/cssc.20220002710.1002/cssc.202200027 ↗
13. 10.1039/C9SE01240K10.1039/C9SE01240K ↗
14. 10.1115/1.404796310.1115/1.4047963 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0104010.1021/acsenergylett.3c01040 ↗
16. 10.1002/celc.20220105610.1002/celc.202201056 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0821908jes10.1149/2.0821908jes ↗
18. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14007810.1016/j.electacta.2022.140078 ↗
19. 10.1039/D1TA06869E10.1039/D1TA06869E ↗
20. 10.1007/s43979-024-00101-y10.1007/s43979-024-00101-y ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.010 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41560-019-0372-810.1038/s41560-019-0372-8 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.10134510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101345 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.1c2247210.1021/acsami.1c22472 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.coelec.2023.10121810.1016/j.coelec.2023.101218 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0083210.1021/acsenergylett.4c00832 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41560-020-0577-x10.1038/s41560-020-0577-x ↗
28. 10.1039/D0EE04086J10.1039/D0EE04086J ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.04510.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.045 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0255010.1021/acs.macromol.5b02550 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10682910.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106829 ↗
32. J.Chen W.Du Z.Guo S.Lu M. P.Tudball X.Yang Z.Zhou S.Zhou A.Rack B.Lukic P. R.Shearing S. J.Haigh S. M.Holmes T. S.Miller Decoupling Membrane Electrode Assembly Materials Complexity from Fuel Cell Performance through Image‐Based Multiphase and Multiphysics Modelling. Advanced Energy Materials Portico2025 15 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20240517910.1002/aenm.202405179 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-023-30960-x10.1038/s41598-023-30960-x ↗
34. 10.1149/1945-7111/ace28910.1149/1945-7111/ace289 ↗
35. 10.1149/2.0561904jes10.1149/2.0561904jes ↗
36. 10.1149/1945-7111/acfa2610.1149/1945-7111/acfa26 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.01910.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.019 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13646410.1016/j.electacta.2020.136464 ↗
39. 10.1149/1945-7111/abe56b10.1149/1945-7111/abe56b ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23067410.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230674 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.14410.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.144 ↗
42. 10.1039/D4TA02885F10.1039/D4TA02885F ↗
43. FUMATECH BWT GmbH.Technical Data Sheet ‐ fumasep FAA‐3‐50 https://www.fuelcellstore.com/spec‐sheets/fumasep‐faa‐3‐50‐technical‐specifications.pdf(accessed: August 2024).
44. AGC Chemicals inc.FORBLUE Selemion Data Sheethttps://www.agcchem.com/products/forblue‐membranes‐polymers/forblue‐selemion/(accessed: August 2024).
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22993710.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229937 ↗
46. I.Malone H. G. C.Hamilton A. J. E.Rettie C.Zalitis Reliable Reference Electrode Measurements in Membrane‐Based Water Electrolysers (in Prep).
47. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0087810.1021/acsenergylett.3c00878 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23241710.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232417 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0231611jes10.1149/2.0231611jes ↗
50. 10.1149/1945-7111/ace74110.1149/1945-7111/ace741 ↗
51. 10.1149/1945-7111/abdcc910.1149/1945-7111/abdcc9 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41929-022-00776-510.1038/s41929-022-00776-5 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.15410.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.154 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22909310.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229093 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.elecom.2015.01.00510.1016/j.elecom.2015.01.005 ↗
56. 10.1002/advs.20241296210.1002/advs.202412962 ↗
57. A.Tampucci P.Bert US 8 340 882 B22016.
58. 10.1073/pnas.121721511010.1073/pnas.1217215110 ↗
59. 10.1039/D3CS00186E10.1039/D3CS00186E ↗
60. 10.3390/membranes1210098910.3390/membranes12100989 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0156410.1021/acsomega.3c01564 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23324210.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233242 ↗
63. 10.1149/2.042208jes10.1149/2.042208jes ↗
64. 10.1149/2.0751610jes10.1149/2.0751610jes ↗
65. 10.1016/j.elspec.2008.01.00210.1016/j.elspec.2008.01.002 ↗
66. 10.1107/S160057751302516210.1107/S1600577513025162 ↗
67. 10.1088/2515-7655/abb78310.1088/2515-7655/abb783 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.03310.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.033 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.00210.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.002 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.14076510.1016/j.cej.2022.140765 ↗
71. 10.1149/2.0421908jes10.1149/2.0421908jes ↗
72. Wadeson N. · 2016