journal article·2025-11-20

Regulating Local Mn─O Coordination to Suppress the Intrinsic Anti‐Site Defects in Mn‐Based Phosphate Cathodes

Xusheng Zhang, Yang Huang, Xiaowei Li, Feng Yan, Zhao Chen, Zhihao Zhang, Zilong Lv, Lilu Liu, Qiang Li, Weixiang Li, Liwei Jiang, Yaxia Yin, Yong‐Sheng Hu, Junmei Zhao

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The Mn‐based phosphate Na 3+2x Mn 1+x Ti 1‐x (PO 4 ) 3 cathodes have attracted widespread attention for Na‐ion batteries owing to the abundant Mn resource and high Mn 2+ /Mn 3+ /Mn 4+ redox potential. However, they suffer from high voltage hysteresis and low reversible capacity at 2.5–4.2 V (60–80 mAh g−1) due to intrinsic anti‐site defects of Mn 2+ occupying Na2 vacancies. Although metal ion substitutions (e.g., V 3+ ) can reduce intrinsic anti‐site defects and improve reversible capacity (80–110 mAh g −1 ), the underlying mechanism remains not well‐understood, limiting further improvement of the reversible capacity. Here, five metal‐ion substitution cathodes: Na 3.4 Mn 1.15 Ti 0.75 M 0.1 (PO 4 ) 3 (M = Fe 3+ , Al 3+ , V 3+ , Cr 3+ , and Ga 3+ ) are systematically studied, among which only two metal ions (V 3+ and Cr 3+ ) can remarkably reduce intrinsic Mn 2+ /Na2 anti‐site defect and voltage hysteresis. The revealed mechanism is that V 3+ and Cr 3+ substitutions tend to form a MnO 5 polyhedron with the less Mn─O coordination numbers under the assumption of Mn 2+ occupying the Na2 vacancy, compared to the MnO 6 octahedron in other metal‐ion substitutions (Fe 3+ , Al 3+ , and Ga 3+ ). The formation of MnO 5 polyhedron indicates an energetically more unfavorable state for Mn 2+ /Na2 anti‐site defects. The designed Na 3.5 Mn 1.15 Ti 0.65 V 0.1 Cr 0.1 (PO 4 ) 3 cathode exhibits the lowest ratio of intrinsic anti‐site defect (0.28%) and achieves a high reversible capacity (120.7 mAh g −1 ) and high energy density (431.6 Wh kg −1 ), with superior cycling stability (93.2% retention after 2000 cycles at 5 C). This work offers valuable insights for designing high‐capacity and high‐energy Mn‐based Na‐ion cathodes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CAS Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering Institute of Process Engineering Chinese Academic of Sciences Beijing 100190 China

School of Chemical Engineering University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 China

Bejing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics Institute of Physics Chinese Academy of Science Beijing 100190 China

Laboratory of Chemistry and Utilization of Carbon ‐Based Energy Resources College of Chemistry Xinjiang University Urumqi 830017 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Pomerantseva E. · Science · 2019 · 366 · 96910.1126/science.aan8285 ↗
2. Huang Y. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 12
3. Hu Y. S. · ACS Energy Letter · 2024 · 9 · 608110.1021/acsenergylett.4c03230 ↗
4. Deng J. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 810.1002/aenm.201701428 ↗
5. Hu Y. S. · ACS Energy Letter · 2021 · 6 · 411510.1021/acsenergylett.1c02292 ↗
6. Xu C. · ACS Cent. Sci. · 2023 · 9 · 172110.1021/acscentsci.3c00907 ↗
7. Fang Y. · Small · 2018 · 1410.1002/smll.201703116 ↗
8. Lian Z. · ACS Energy Letter · 2025 · 10 · 151710.1021/acsenergylett.4c03332 ↗
9. Gao H. · Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 655310.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02096 ↗
10. Zhang J. · ACS Energy Lett. · 2021 · 6 · 208110.1021/acsenergylett.1c00426 ↗
11. Liu Y. · Nat. Energy · 2023 · 8 · 108810.1038/s41560-023-01301-z ↗
12. Xu C. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 310.1002/adfm.202302810 ↗
13. Hu P. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2023 · 6210.1002/anie.202219304 ↗
14. Deng S. · ACS Nano · 2025 · 1910.1021/acsnano.4c18519 ↗
15. Zhang H. · Adv. Mater. · 2024 · 3610.1002/adma.202410797 ↗
16. Hu P. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 3410.1002/adfm.202302045 ↗
17. Xu C. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2025 · 6410.1002/anie.202502758 ↗
18. Zhang N. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2024 · 7210.1016/j.ensm.2024.103734 ↗
19. Cheng S. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2025 · 13
20. Ji F. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2024 · 6810.1016/j.ensm.2024.103371 ↗
21. Zhang J. · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 3210.1002/adma.201906348 ↗
22. Cao X. · Nano Energy · 2019 · 60 · 31210.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.066 ↗
23. Xu C. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2021 · 1110.1002/aenm.202100729 ↗
24. Zhang X. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2024 · 7210.1016/j.ensm.2024.103764 ↗
25. Zhang X. · ACS Energy Lett. · 2025 · 10 · 280410.1021/acsenergylett.5c00653 ↗
26. Wu X. H. · Adv. Mater. · 2025 · 36
27. Hu Q. · ACS Energy Lett. · 2025 · 10 · 184010.1021/acsenergylett.5c00315 ↗
28. Li H. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2020 · 26 · 32510.1016/j.ensm.2019.11.004 ↗
29. Xu C. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 1210.1002/aenm.202200966 ↗
30. Li W. · Mater. Today Energy · 2024 · 4510.1016/j.mtener.2024.101678 ↗