Traps, Tail States and Their Consequences on the Open‐circuit Voltage in Organic Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract All that remains to reliably beat the 20% efficiency hurdle in organic solar cells are the relatively low open‐circuit voltages ( V OC ). A still‐needed step toward solving this problem is to shed light on the mechanisms behind these losses, and herein it is focused on understanding the roll‐off of V OC at low temperatures, which has been linked to various detrimental processes. Here, a light intensity sweep is added to the temperature‐dependent measurements and the resulting trends are compared with a kinetic analytical model that not only incorporates all previously suggested explanations for the temperature dependence of V OC , but, importantly, also includes carrier density contributions to the electron and hole mobilities by treating the density of states (DOS) of the active layer as a two‐level system. It is found that this description is sufficient to quantitatively explain V OC roll‐off in terms of charges getting trapped in intrinsic tail states of the Gaussian DOS without having to assume the presence of extrinsic traps.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Molecular Systems Engineering and Advanced Materials Heidelberg University Im Neuenheimer Feld 225 69120 Heidelberg Germany
Funding
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41563-022-01244-y10.1038/s41563-022-01244-y ↗
2. 10.1039/C7SE00601B10.1039/C7SE00601B ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0336510.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03365 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat254810.1038/nmat2548 ↗
5. 10.1002/aelm.20230029310.1002/aelm.202300293 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.03.01210.1016/j.solmat.2011.03.012 ↗
7. 10.1002/solr.20200037510.1002/solr.202000375 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.12870110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.128701 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.07.00610.1016/j.solmat.2010.07.006 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.07521010.1103/PhysRevB.84.075210 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20100431110.1002/adma.201004311 ↗
12. Langevin P. · Ann. Chim. Phys. · 1903 · 28 · 433
13. 10.1002/solr.20200049810.1002/solr.202000498 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.20660110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.206601 ↗
15. 10.1073/pnas.190877611610.1073/pnas.1908776116 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.06403910.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064039 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.05660110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.056601 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.07.04710.1016/j.solmat.2015.07.047 ↗
19. 10.1021/jp911936410.1021/jp9119364 ↗
20. 10.1063/5.015883310.1063/5.0158833 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.06.01010.1016/j.orgel.2018.06.010 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-020-17867-110.1038/s41467-020-17867-1 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20230252010.1002/adfm.202302520 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20190676310.1002/adma.201906763 ↗
25. 10.1088/0953-8984/9/13/00710.1088/0953-8984/9/13/007 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0223510.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02235 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20230200510.1002/adma.202302005 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41563-019-0347-y10.1038/s41563-019-0347-y ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.02403410.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024034 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.23640310.1103/PhysRevLett.130.236403 ↗
31. 10.1039/D4EE02612H10.1039/D4EE02612H ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20150223010.1002/aenm.201502230 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.122818310.1126/science.1228183 ↗