journal article·2006-12

Robustness of hollow clay masonry units and seismic behaviour of masonry walls

M. Tomaževič, M. Lutman, V. Bosiljkov

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract As the recent experimental investigations indicated, the robustness of masonry units is one among the most decisive parameters which define the behaviour of masonry walls when subjected to seismic loads. If local brittle failure of units occurs, the mechanism of behaviour and known relationships between the strength and ductility properties of masonry walls change. In such a case, the design values of load bearing and energy dissipation capacity of masonry walls are overestimated, although the equations and requirements specified in the codes have been taken into consideration. If brittle units are used for the construction of structural walls, the actual structure will be exposed to an increased level of seismic risk although it has been designed for earthquake loads according to codes. This is especially the case of reinforced masonry, where brittle local failure prevents the transfer of predicted forces from reinforcing steel to masonry units. In order to provide limitations for the use of hollow units with large hole volume ratio and thin shells and webs in seismic areas, a measure to define the qualitative term “sufficient robustness”, specified in Eurocode 8, should be found.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Civil and Structural Engineering Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Bosiljkov V, Tomaževič M, Lutman M. Optimization of shape of masonry units and technology of construction for earthquake resistant masonry buildings. Research Report ZAG, Ljubljana; 2004.
2. Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures. Part 1-1: General rules for buildings – Rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry. ENV 1996-1-1: 1996. CEN, Brussels; 1996.
3. Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures, Part 1-1: Common rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. prEN 1996-1-1: 2003. CEN, Brussels; 2003.
4. Eurocode 8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures – Part 1-3: General rules – Specific rules for various materials and elements. ENV 1998-1-3: 1995. CEN, Brussels; 1995.
5. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. prEN 1998-1: 2003. CEN, Brussels; 2003.
6. Tomaževič M, Klemenc I, Lutman M. Damage as a measure for seismic resistance of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings, earthquake engineering, eighth canadian conference. Vancouver, 1999. p. 119–24.
7. Tomaževič · 1999
8. Tomaževič M, Lutman M. Seismic behavior of hollow unit masonry walls with bed joint reinforcement – the limits. In: Proceedings of 6th US national conference on earthquake engineering. Oakland: EERE; 1998. Paper 239, CD ROM.
9. Tomaževič M, Lutman M. Influence of reinforcement and block strength on seismic behavior of reinforced masonry walls. In: Proceedings of 11th IBMaC, vol. 1. Shanghai; 1997. p. 217–26.