journal article·2026-01Open access

Control Over Vertical Composition in Low Complexity Polymer Solar Cells

Xinyun Dong, Byongkyu Lee, Runqiao Song, Justin Neu, Somayeh Kashani, Wei You, Harald Ade

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Inverted organic solar cells are promising due to their better stability compared to conventional structures. Donors with low synthetic complexity are desirable to lower costs. However, inverted devices are rarely used in low‐complexity systems. To investigate the reasons, the low‐complexity PTQ10:BTP‐eC9 binary system is benchmarked against the high‐complexity PM6:BTP‐eC9 system. In PTQ10:BTP‐eC9, where the efficiency of inverted devices lags the conventional structure significantly, distinct wetting layers are observed in conventional and inverted device structures. Conversely, the vertical distribution of PM6:BTP‐eC9 remains unaffected by changes in interlayer materials. The surface is always enriched in BTP‐eC9, but less for PM6. Importantly, the addition of PC 71 BM reduces the nonuniform vertical composition gradients. As the PC 71 BM concentration increases, the efficiency of the inverted PTQ10 devices approach that of the conventional devices and PTQ10:BTP‐eC9:PC 71 BM (1:1.2:0.4) exhibits negligible efficiency differences between inverted (14.01%) and conventional (14.49%) architectures. The concentration‐gradients aredriven by the interfacial energy between the active layer and interlayer materials and the casting kinetics in the case of the surface. Understanding the thermodynamic and kinetic aspects provides valuable insights for optimizing the performance of inverted organic solar cells, bringing them closer to practical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL) North Carolina State University Raleigh NC 27695 USA

Department of Chemistry University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · Office of Naval Research

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. Yi J. · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2023
2. 10.1038/s41560-022-00997-910.1038/s41560-022-00997-9 ↗
3. 10.1039/D2EE04183A10.1039/D2EE04183A ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20200357010.1002/aenm.202003570 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41560-021-00923-510.1038/s41560-021-00923-5 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20230509210.1002/adma.202305092 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.12.01810.1016/j.joule.2019.12.018 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8TA11378E10.1039/C8TA11378E ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20211020910.1002/adfm.202110209 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20140431710.1002/adma.201404317 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20160028110.1002/adma.201600281 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.7b0267710.1021/jacs.7b02677 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00410.1016/j.joule.2019.01.004 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.01010.1016/j.joule.2019.09.010 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20200515310.1002/adma.202005153 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41560-021-00820-x10.1038/s41560-021-00820-x ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20220208910.1002/adma.202202089 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41563-022-01244-y10.1038/s41563-022-01244-y ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20220471810.1002/adma.202204718 ↗
20. 10.1039/D3EE01164J10.1039/D3EE01164J ↗
21. 10.1038/s41560-023-01436-z10.1038/s41560-023-01436-z ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.00810.1016/j.joule.2022.05.008 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20170046510.1002/aenm.201700465 ↗
24. 10.1002/cssc.20210091010.1002/cssc.202100910 ↗
25. 10.1039/D0MA00133C10.1039/D0MA00133C ↗
26. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0136410.1021/acsenergylett.2c01364 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20210951610.1002/adma.202109516 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20200076510.1002/aenm.202000765 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20230140410.1002/adma.202301404 ↗
30. 10.1002/eem2.1238110.1002/eem2.12381 ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20230053110.1002/solr.202300531 ↗
32. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c0385410.1021/acssuschemeng.4c03854 ↗
33. 10.26599/EMD.2024.937003310.26599/EMD.2024.9370033 ↗
34. 10.1002/solr.20220069110.1002/solr.202200691 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20220130610.1002/aenm.202201306 ↗
36. 10.1039/D1EE03263A10.1039/D1EE03263A ↗
37. 10.1039/C5TA10192A10.1039/C5TA10192A ↗
38. 10.1002/solr.20200036410.1002/solr.202000364 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.04110.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.041 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.05910.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.059 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.07.01610.1016/j.orgel.2013.07.016 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0021710.1021/acsaem.2c00217 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41560-018-0234-910.1038/s41560-018-0234-9 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-022-29803-610.1038/s41467-022-29803-6 ↗
45. 10.1039/C9EE00825J10.1039/C9EE00825J ↗
46. 10.1039/C5CS00831J10.1039/C5CS00831J ↗
47. 10.1002/aenm.20190268810.1002/aenm.201902688 ↗
48. 10.1002/solr.20210015110.1002/solr.202100151 ↗
49. 10.1039/D2TA10091F10.1039/D2TA10091F ↗
50. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.00610.1016/j.joule.2021.06.006 ↗
51. 10.1002/aenm.20190037610.1002/aenm.201900376 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41563-017-0005-110.1038/s41563-017-0005-1 ↗
53. 10.1002/solr.20200009810.1002/solr.202000098 ↗
54. 10.1002/solr.20200053810.1002/solr.202000538 ↗
55. 10.1039/c3an01035j10.1039/c3an01035j ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0091110.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00911 ↗
57. 10.1021/ma302337p10.1021/ma302337p ↗
58. 10.1002/adfm.20230119210.1002/adfm.202301192 ↗
59. 10.1002/aenm.20170107310.1002/aenm.201701073 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0094510.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00945 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.00210.1016/j.joule.2023.06.002 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0239510.1021/acsaem.2c02395 ↗
63. 10.1002/aenm.20170137010.1002/aenm.201701370 ↗
64. 10.1002/aenm.20210259410.1002/aenm.202102594 ↗
65. 10.1002/smtd.20230145110.1002/smtd.202301451 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.01610.1016/j.orgel.2018.09.016 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0155810.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c01558 ↗
68. 10.1039/D3TA06617G10.1039/D3TA06617G ↗