Tuning the Valence of MnO x Cathodes Reveals the Universality of the Proton‐Coupled Electrodissolution/Electrodeposition Mechanism in Rechargeable Aqueous Zn Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The charge storage mechanism of manganese oxides (MnO x ) in rechargeable mild aqueous Zn batteries is still a matter of debate, with no consensus on mechanism and charge carriers. In this work, this issue is addressed by relying on a quantitative and comparative electrochemical study of low‐valence crystalline MnO x cathodes in a range of aqueous electrolytes, with a primary focus on spinel Mn 3 O 4 . The results demonstrate that the oxidation state of Mn in MnO x structures as well as their degree of crystallinity have little impact on the electrochemical reactivity, all MnO x being fully converted into soluble Mn 2+ upon discharge. It is further revealed that this electrodissolution mechanism is affected by Mn 3 O 4 dismutation in the most acidic electrolytes. Accordingly, the true thermodynamics and kinetics of Mn 3 O 4 are only accessible at mildly acidic to neutral pHs. In addition, the study confirms the phase transformation of Mn 3 O 4 to Mn 5 O 8 upon galvanostatic oxidation, and demonstrates that this transformation only proceeds in Mn 2+ ‐free electrolytes, since otherwise amorphous MnO 2 electrodeposits on top of Mn 3 O 4 . Finally, it is concluded that regardless of the starting MnO x material, after the first discharge or a first charge/discharge cycle, subsequent charge/discharge cycles rely on a reversible proton‐coupled electrodeposition of amorphous MnO 2 .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Université de Paris Laboratoire d'Electrochimie Moléculaire UMR CNRS 7591 Paris F‐75013 France
Chimie de la Matière Condensé Sorbonne Université – CNRS UMR 7574, 4 place Jussieu Paris 75005 France
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0074010.1021/acsenergylett.0c00740 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0142610.1021/acsenergylett.8b01426 ↗
3. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab5b3810.1088/1361-6528/ab5b38 ↗
4. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.3910.1038/nenergy.2016.39 ↗
5. 10.1039/C5RA05892A10.1039/C5RA05892A ↗
6. 10.3390/nano711039610.3390/nano7110396 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20200290410.1002/aenm.202002904 ↗
8. 10.1039/C9TA04735B10.1039/C9TA04735B ↗
9. 10.1039/D1TA01951A10.1039/D1TA01951A ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.11519610.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115196 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20200033210.1002/aenm.202000332 ↗
12. 10.1039/C9EE03702K10.1039/C9EE03702K ↗
13. 10.1039/D0EE02168G10.1039/D0EE02168G ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20190416310.1002/aenm.201904163 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0103910.1021/acsaem.0c01039 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20210151510.1002/smll.202101515 ↗
17. 10.1002/cssc.20200121610.1002/cssc.202001216 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mtener.2020.10039610.1016/j.mtener.2020.100396 ↗
19. 10.1002/smll.20200540610.1002/smll.202005406 ↗
20. 10.1039/D1EE01120K10.1039/D1EE01120K ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.02710.1016/j.jechem.2020.07.027 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.13885210.1016/j.electacta.2021.138852 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20190208510.1002/aenm.201902085 ↗
24. 10.1002/celc.20210088810.1002/celc.202100888 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23102310.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231023 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20200941210.1002/adfm.202009412 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.0c0596810.1021/acsami.0c05968 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12550910.1016/j.cej.2020.125509 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.16310.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.163 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.16610.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.166 ↗
31. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0250210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02502 ↗
32. 10.1039/C8TA01198B10.1039/C8TA01198B ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-018-07980-710.1038/s41467-018-07980-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15181210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151812 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20200320310.1002/aenm.202003203 ↗
36. 10.1002/er.523410.1002/er.5234 ↗
37. 10.1002/aenm.20200105010.1002/aenm.202001050 ↗
38. 10.1002/aenm.20210096210.1002/aenm.202100962 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16274710.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162747 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.13615510.1016/j.electacta.2020.136155 ↗
41. 10.1039/D1MA00159K10.1039/D1MA00159K ↗
42. 10.1002/cssc.20210239010.1002/cssc.202102390 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15831610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158316 ↗
44. 10.1039/C9SE00277D10.1039/C9SE00277D ↗
45. 10.1039/D0TA10685B10.1039/D0TA10685B ↗
46. 10.1016/j.diamond.2017.07.00610.1016/j.diamond.2017.07.006 ↗
47. 10.1149/1.160574410.1149/1.1605744 ↗
48. 10.1021/jp501768n10.1021/jp501768n ↗
49. 10.1002/anie.20190417410.1002/anie.201904174 ↗
50. 10.1021/nn202958310.1021/nn2029583 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.27910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.279 ↗
52. 10.1002/aenm.20180144510.1002/aenm.201801445 ↗
53. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac113110.1088/1361-6528/ac1131 ↗
54. 10.1002/cssc.20190118210.1002/cssc.201901182 ↗
55. 10.1021/jacs.0c0505410.1021/jacs.0c05054 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.09.03410.1016/j.ensm.2022.09.034 ↗
57. 10.1039/D1CP03012D10.1039/D1CP03012D ↗
58. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab6c5710.1149/1945-7111/ab6c57 ↗
59. 10.1039/C9SC02397F10.1039/C9SC02397F ↗
60. 10.1021/ed073p51610.1021/ed073p516 ↗
61. 10.1002/aenm.20190146910.1002/aenm.201901469 ↗
62. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)80016-B10.1016/0022-0728(93)80016-B ↗
63. 10.1021/acsami.8b1628410.1021/acsami.8b16284 ↗
64. 10.1002/cssc.20160070210.1002/cssc.201600702 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.03910.1016/j.cclet.2022.05.039 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.08.04310.1016/j.ensm.2022.08.043 ↗
67. 10.1002/anie.20201158810.1002/anie.202011588 ↗
68. 10.1021/acsami.2c0296010.1021/acsami.2c02960 ↗
69. 10.1002/smll.20190584210.1002/smll.201905842 ↗
70. 10.1351/pac-rep-13-06-0310.1351/pac-rep-13-06-03 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.12910.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.129 ↗
72. Bard A. J. · 1985
73. The peak in dQ/dVversus potential plot occurs at a potential nearly identical to half‐discharge potentialEdof the discharge plateau. Therefore any one of them can be considered as discharge plateau potential for analysis.
74. Note that in the absence of the preadded Mn2+in the buffered electrolyte aMn2+is very low and governed by the amount of Mn2+in situ released during the discharge of the electrode. This lowaMn2+is thus expected to lead in a small up‐shift of the discharge plateau potential according to Equation (4).[11]
75. 10.4236/eng.2013.5908510.4236/eng.2013.59085 ↗
76. Note that the release of Mn2+by dismutation of Mn3O4does not affect the total gravimetric capacity of the manganese oxide film for the reason that the AOS of Mn in the remaining solid electrode material is concomitantly increased during this process (Equation (6)).
77. 10.1007/s10800-012-0424-210.1007/s10800-012-0424-2 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2021.10014910.1016/j.mtadv.2021.100149 ↗
79. Note that in the absence of zinc salt in the buffered electrolyte the charge voltage in our two‐electrode cell configuration is rather defined versus H+/H2at the zinc anode and can thus not be directly compared to that recorded in the 1 mZnSO4electrolyte.
80. 10.1002/adfm.20191042410.1002/adfm.201910424 ↗