Impurity Gettering in Polycrystalline‐Silicon Based Passivating Contacts—The Role of Oxide Stoichiometry and Pinholes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Polycrystalline‐silicon/oxide (poly‐Si/SiOx) passivating contacts for high efficiency solar cells exhibit excellent surface passivation, carrier selectivity, and impurity gettering effects. However, the ultrathin SiOx interlayer can act as a diffusion barrier for metal impurities and this potentially slows down the overall gettering rate of the poly‐Si/SiOx structures. Herein, the factors that determine the blocking effects of the SiOx interlayers are identified and investigated by examining two general types of the SiOx interlayers: 1.3 nm ultrathin tunneling SiOx with negligible pinholes and 2.5 nm SiOx with thermally created pinholes. Iron is used as tracer impurity in silicon to quantify the gettering rate. By fitting the experimental gettering kinetics by a diffusion‐limited segregation gettering model, the blocking effects of the SiOx interlayers are quantified by a transport parameter. Both the oxide stoichiometry and pinhole density affect the effective transport of iron through SiOx interlayers. The oxide stoichiometry depends strongly on the oxidation method, while the pinhole density is affected by the activation temperature, doping concentration, doping technique, and possibly the dopant type as well. To enable a fast gettering process during typical high‐temperature formation of the poly‐Si/SiOx structures, a SiOx interlayer that is less stoichiometric or with a higher pinhole density is preferred.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering The Australian National University Canberra ACT 2601 Australia
Institute of Electronic Materials and Devices Leibniz Universität Hannover Hannover Germany
Fraunhofer Institute for Solar EnergySystems ISE Heidenhofstrasse 2 79110 Freiburg Germany
Funding
Australian Renewable Energy Agency · Australian Centre for Advanced Photovoltaics
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.01510.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.015 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0214910.1021/acsaem.8b02149 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.02.01310.1016/j.joule.2021.02.013 ↗
4. 10.1002/pip.296010.1002/pip.2960 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.02010.1016/j.solmat.2018.06.020 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.01.00510.1016/j.solmat.2019.01.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11025810.1016/j.solmat.2019.110258 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00339005107410.1007/s003390051074 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.181283310.1063/1.1812833 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20100084910.1002/adfm.201000849 ↗
11. Schmidt J. · 2012 · 1
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.05510.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.055 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.11.00410.1016/j.solmat.2017.11.004 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0036710.1021/acsaem.8b00367 ↗
15. 10.1002/pssa.20190032110.1002/pssa.201900321 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11025610.1016/j.solmat.2019.110256 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11125410.1016/j.solmat.2021.111254 ↗
18. 10.1002/solr.20200075410.1002/solr.202000754 ↗
19. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.311601710.1109/JPHOTOV.2021.3116017 ↗
20. 10.1002/pip.299010.1002/pip.2990 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41560-021-00805-w10.1038/s41560-021-00805-w ↗
22. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11071310.1016/j.solmat.2020.110713 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11042310.1016/j.solmat.2020.110423 ↗
24. J.‐I.Polzin F.Feldmann B.Steinhauser M.Hermle S. W.Glunz inAIP Conf. Proc.2019 2147 040016.10.1063/1.5123843 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.06.04810.1016/j.solmat.2015.06.048 ↗
26. 10.1016/0010-938X(81)90063-910.1016/0010-938X(81)90063-9 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.12212810.1063/1.122128 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.139254810.1149/1.1392548 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.498581910.1063/1.4985819 ↗
30. 10.1002/cphc.20030083510.1002/cphc.200300835 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.783610.1103/PhysRevB.53.7836 ↗
32. 10.1149/1.139088810.1149/1.1390888 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.04510.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.045 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.04110.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.041 ↗
35. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.287073510.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2870735 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.36115510.1063/1.361155 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.10997810.1016/j.solmat.2019.109978 ↗
38. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.274842210.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2748422 ↗
39. 10.1002/pip.332710.1002/pip.3327 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.01.00810.1016/j.solmat.2018.01.008 ↗
41. Tetzlaff D. · 2016 · 022110.1109/PVSC.2016.7749582 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.04610.1016/j.solmat.2018.05.046 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.00310.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.01710.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.017 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.503761010.1063/1.5037610 ↗
46. 10.1002/solr.20180006810.1002/solr.201800068 ↗
47. J.Krügener F.Haase C.Hollemann R.Peibst U.Höhne J.‐D.Kähler H.‐J.Osten in29th Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conf. 2019 PVSEC‐29 2019.
48. 10.1007/s00339005096810.1007/s003390050968 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.165720110.1063/1.1657201 ↗
50. 10.1149/1.210882710.1149/1.2108827 ↗
51. 10.1143/JJAP.43.110.1143/JJAP.43.1 ↗
52. Graff K. · 2013
53. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11144710.1016/j.solmat.2021.111447 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.01210.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.012 ↗
55. Truong T. · 2019 · 270510.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980647 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.01510.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.015 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11034810.1016/j.solmat.2019.110348 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.369340310.1063/1.3693403 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.178963010.1063/1.1789630 ↗
60. Feldmann F. · 2019 · 304
61. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.02510.1016/j.solmat.2018.07.025 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.11772310.1063/1.117723 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.34506310.1063/1.345063 ↗
64. 10.1063/1.137215610.1063/1.1372156 ↗
65. 10.1063/1.163713610.1063/1.1637136 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.235812610.1063/1.2358126 ↗
67. 10.1088/0268-1242/16/7/30710.1088/0268-1242/16/7/307 ↗
68. 10.1002/pssr.20110538810.1002/pssr.201105388 ↗
69. 10.1063/1.306833710.1063/1.3068337 ↗