Field performance evaluation of asphalt mixtures containing high percentage of RAP using LTPP data
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) has been used in production of new mixtures for many decades and has become a common practice in highway agencies. However, concerns about field performance of RAP mixtures have been lingering on since the beginning of RAP usage. In this study, the field performance of RAP was verified through the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program. Particularly, pavement overlays constructed with virgin asphalt and those constructed with a significant RAP percentage were examined and compared regarding their field performance. To achieve this goal, data from the Specific Pavement Study experiment 5 (SPS-5) of LTPP were retrieved and statistically analyzed for comparison. A total of eighteen projects comprised of 162 sections were collected. Various performance measures were incorporated, including alligator cracking, longitudinal cracking (wheel path and non-wheel path), transverse cracking, patching, potholes, rutting, roughness, and pavement surface deflections. In addition to the key variables used in the SPS-5 experiment (thickness, materials and pre-overlay treatment), the impacts of other important factors, including climatic conditions, initial surface condition and subgrade soil classification, were also investigated. Exploratory data analyses and logistic regression were used to compare the performance of RAP and virgin asphalt overlays. Results from the analysis results show that RAP had little effects on longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, and roughness, but slightly increased the risk of fatigue cracking and weakened pavement structure. As expected, use of RAP was beneficial in reducing the rutting potential of thick overlays. For both RAP and virgin asphalt overlays, thicker overlays performed better than thinner ones in all performance measures except for rutting. Pre-overlay treatment methods and subgrade soil types were found to be critical factors affecting fatigue cracking and roughness. The initial surface condition also showed significant effects on pavement structural capacity and fatigue cracking over the long run.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Laboratory investigation of mixing hot-mix asphalt with reclaimed asphalt pavement
2. Blending efficiency of reclaimed asphalt pavement: an approach utilizing rheological properties and molecular weight distributions10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.059 ↗
3. Designing recycled hot mix asphalt mixtures using Superpave technology
4. Laboratory evaluation of fatigue characteristics of recycled asphalt mixture10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.04.019 ↗
5. Rheological characteristics investigation of high percentage RAP binders with WMA technology at various aging states10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.114 ↗
6. R. McDaniel, R.M. Anderson, Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the Superpave mix design method: technician’s manual, Project D9–12 FY’97, 2001.
7. Rehabilitation of asphalt concrete pavements: initial evaluation of the SPS-5 experiment-final report
8. Performance of flexible pavement rehabilitation treatments in the long-term pavement performance SPS-5 experiment
9. Performance of recycled hot-mix asphalt overlays in rehabilitation of flexible pavements10.3141/2155-06 ↗
10. Use of data from specific pavement studies experiment 5 in the long-term pavement performance program to compare virgin and recycled asphalt pavements10.3141/2208-11 ↗
11. Evaluation of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of asphalt pavement rehabilitations utilizing LTPP data10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000378 ↗
12. The effects of using reclaimed asphalt pavements (RAP) on the long-term performance of asphalt concrete overlays10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.115 ↗
13. J.S. Miller, W.Y. Bellinger, Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program, Tech. Rep. NO. FHWA-RD-03-031, 2003.
14. Critical rut depth for pavement maintenance based on vehicle skidding and hydroplaning consideration10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000336 ↗
15. G.T. Rohde, Determining pavement structural number from FWD testing, Transportation Research Record (1448).
16. Trends in deflection with application of repeated loads: impact on deflection data averaging10.3141/2068-08 ↗
17. M. Thompson, Area Under the Pavement Profile to Predict Strain, in: Informal Presentation at FWD Users Group Annual Meeting, Indianapolis, IN, 1989.
18. Use of falling weight deflectometer multi-load data for pavement strength estimation
19. Temperature predictions and adjustment factors for asphalt pavement
20. R.L. Ott, M.T. Longnecker, An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis, Nelson Education, 2015.
21. Effectiveness analyses of flexible pavement preventive maintenance treatments with LTPP SPS-3 experiment data10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000818 ↗
22. Predicting asphalt pavement crack initiation following rehabilitation treatments10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.031 ↗
23. Ordinal logistic regression model for predicting AC overlay cracking10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000327 ↗