Taming Metal–Solid Electrolyte Interface Instability via Metal Strain Hardening
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Solid‐state lithium metal batteries have emerged as a promising technology for electric vehicles due to their high specific energy and safety potential. Obtaining intimate contact between Li and electrolyte during cell fabrication, however, remains challenging. Adequate fabrication pressure is required to promote close contact, but this pressure can cause Li deformation and penetration into the electrolyte, resulting in poor battery performance. Here, a strategy for addressing this problem is presented by incorporating 3 at% Mg into Li. Unlike pure Li which obeys the Voce hardening law and allows unconstrained deformation, Li─Mg alloy follows the Swift hardening law and strengthens with strain under compression stress. Because of the constrained deformation of Li─Mg, intimate contact with solid electrolytes is possible even at high fabrication pressure (50–65 MPa), resulting in high critical current densities. These findings underscore the importance of understanding Li metal deformation properties to improve solid‐state battery performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Texas Center for Superconductivity at the University of Houston University of Houston Houston 77204 TX USA
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Northeastern University Boston 02115 MA USA
Materials Science and Engineering Program University of Houston Houston 77204 TX USA
Department of Materials Science and Nanoengineering Rice University Houston 77005 TX USA
Department of Engineering Technology University of Houston Houston 77204 TX USA
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41560-017-0047-210.1038/s41560-017-0047-2 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-020-0565-110.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0190510.1021/acsenergylett.0c01905 ↗
4. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.3010.1038/nenergy.2016.30 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10608110.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106081 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.10039710.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100397 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.07.00510.1016/j.ssi.2017.07.005 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0087410.1021/acs.accounts.0c00874 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0043110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0044510.1021/acsenergylett.1c00445 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41563-019-0438-910.1038/s41563-019-0438-9 ↗
13. Zhang X. · Cell Rep. · 2020 · 1
14. Singh D. K. · Cell Rep. · 2022 · 3
15. 10.1021/acsami.9b0253710.1021/acsami.9b02537 ↗
16. Tu Q. · Cell Rep. · 2020 · 1
17. 10.1002/aenm.20190325310.1002/aenm.201903253 ↗
18. 10.1002/admi.20210020610.1002/admi.202100206 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.01310.1016/j.ensm.2022.12.013 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0221902jes10.1149/2.0221902jes ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-018-2971-310.1007/s10853-018-2971-3 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20160201110.1002/aenm.201602011 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-021-27311-710.1038/s41467-021-27311-7 ↗
24. 10.1039/D2TA02339C10.1039/D2TA02339C ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0035619210.1007/BF00356192 ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.0c0181110.1021/jacs.0c01811 ↗
27. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0087810.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00878 ↗
28. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.1010.1038/nenergy.2016.10 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00521-810.1016/S0378-7753(00)00521-8 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20180875610.1002/adfm.201808756 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20180481510.1002/adma.201804815 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20190256810.1002/aenm.201902568 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0179310.1021/acsenergylett.2c01793 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41563-019-0576-010.1038/s41563-019-0576-0 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matt.2023.02.00810.1016/j.matt.2023.02.008 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.23083110.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230831 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9TA12889A10.1039/C9TA12889A ↗
38. 10.1038/s41563-021-00967-810.1038/s41563-021-00967-8 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.03610.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.036 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.03410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.034 ↗
41. Voce E. · J. Inst. Met. · 1948 · 74 · 537
42. 10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02608-810.1016/S0924-0136(96)02608-8 ↗
43. 10.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-110.1016/0022-5096(52)90002-1 ↗
44. 10.1002/1521-396X(199704)160:2<373::AID-PSSA373>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/1521-396X(199704)160:2<373::AID-PSSA373>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
45. S.Tariq K.Ammigan P.Rurh R.Schultz P.Liu J.Shang Proceedings of the 2003 Particle Accelerator Conference IEEE Piscataway NJ2003 pp.1452–1454.
46. 10.1080/1478643590823334210.1080/14786435908233342 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.03610.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.036 ↗
48. 10.1007/BF0339808910.1007/BF03398089 ↗
49. 10.1002/aenm.20170100310.1002/aenm.201701003 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11673010.1016/j.actamat.2021.116730 ↗
51. 10.1002/aenm.20190325310.1002/aenm.201903253 ↗
52. 10.1021/acsami.1c2013910.1021/acsami.1c20139 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsami.1c0670610.1021/acsami.1c06706 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41563-020-00903-210.1038/s41563-020-00903-2 ↗