Microregion Welding Strategy Prevents the Formation of Inactive Sulfur Species for High‐Performance Li–S Battery
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract An in‐depth understanding of Li–S battery failure mechanisms is of significance for providing design guidance of promoting this class of batteries’ electrochemical performance. During discharge, deposition of solid sulfur species on substrates is observed, leading to large contact resistance and sluggish redox kinetics. Then, the cumulative effect leads to the formation of isolated inactive sulfur species on low‐dimensional substrates (0D, 1D, and 2D), which has been confirmed to be a performance‐determining factor for Li–S batteries through in situ technologies and revolution of electrochemical performance. In this regard, a microregion welding strategy to resist the formation of inactive sulfur species is proposed, which greatly promotes the electrochemical performance Li–S batteries. The battery shows high discharge capacity of 7.8 mAh cm‐2 and good cycling stability. An Ah‐level pouch cell with lean electrolyte (E/S ≈ 2.5 µL mg–1) and 20% excess lithium (anode/cathode ≈ 1.2) also shows low overpotential and high discharge specific capacity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100049 P. R. China
CAS Key Laboratory of Materials for Energy Conversion Shanghai Institute of Ceramics Chinese Academy of Sciences Shanghai 200050 P. R. China
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20190933910.1002/anie.201909339 ↗
2. Shen Z. H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 10
3. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12567410.1016/j.cej.2020.125674 ↗
4. Zhang H. K. · Energy Storage Mater. · 2021 · 35 · 11
5. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0079910.1021/acsnano.0c00799 ↗
6. Hu Q. Q. · Small · 2020 · 16 · 10
7. Zhao Q. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2021 · 28
8. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0252710.1021/acsenergylett.0c02527 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.03210.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.032 ↗
10. Wang L. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2021 · 31 · 11
11. Qiu W. L. · Adv. Sci. · 2021 · 8 · 11
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.08.03210.1016/j.carbon.2020.08.032 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat246010.1038/nmat2460 ↗
14. Tan S. S. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2021 · 31 · 10
15. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.04310.1016/j.ensm.2020.06.043 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0016410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00164 ↗
17. Liu S. N. · Nano Energy · 2019 · 63 · 11
18. 10.1039/C8TA12349G10.1039/C8TA12349G ↗
19. 10.1007/s12274-018-2036-610.1007/s12274-018-2036-6 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.07.02410.1016/j.ensm.2018.07.024 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.05.00210.1016/j.jechem.2018.05.002 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.8b2162710.1021/acsami.8b21627 ↗
23. Liu Y. P. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30 · 10
24. 10.1002/adma.20180322010.1002/adma.201803220 ↗
25. 10.1039/C7TA03236F10.1039/C7TA03236F ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-017-02401-710.1038/s41467-017-02401-7 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41565-020-00829-510.1038/s41565-020-00829-5 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.0c1426010.1021/acsami.0c14260 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20150155910.1002/adma.201501559 ↗
30. Zhao M. · Adv. Mater. · 2021 · 33 · 9
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0442510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04425 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.001 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41560-017-0005-z10.1038/s41560-017-0005-z ↗
34. Song Y. Z. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 10 · 21
35. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.05210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.052 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20201149310.1002/anie.202011493 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0784310.1021/acsnano.8b07843 ↗
38. 10.1039/C7EE01047H10.1039/C7EE01047H ↗