journal article·2022-12Open access

A Dual‐Phase Electrolyte for High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Yuxun Ren, Arumugam Manthiram

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 12· Issue 46

Abstract

Abstract Dissolution of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs) is essential for fast cathode kinetics, but detrimental for anode stability, especially under lean electrolyte conditions. In this work, the phase separation phenomenon between solvents with different polarities (tetramethyl sulfone [TMS] and dibutyl ether [DBE]) is utilized to enable the design of a dual‐phase electrolyte. High‐polarity, high‐density TMS–lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide–ammonium trifluoroacetate as the cathode electrolyte strongly solvates LiPSs, which propel the sulfur redox reaction. Moreover, the composite of DBE and a polymeric ion conductor serves as the anode electrolyte. The addition of DBE in the anode side effectively prevents the crossover of corrosive species (LiPSs and ammonia trifluoroacetate), enabling a significant improvement in Li‐metal anode stability. The electrode‐specific dual‐phase electrolyte design provides electrochemical performance superior to conventional electrolytes. Without additional electrode engineering, pouch cells assemble with the dual‐phase electrolyte cycle under a lean electrolyte (4 µL mg−1) and low‐Li‐excess condition (N/P = 3) for 120 cycles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science & Engineering Program and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78721 USA

Funding

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy · U.S. Department of Energy

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr500062v10.1021/cr500062v ↗
2. 10.1038/s41560-022-01001-010.1038/s41560-022-01001-0 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0199910.1021/acsnano.1c01999 ↗
4. 10.1039/C8CS00826D10.1039/C8CS00826D ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-018-07882-810.1038/s41467-018-07882-8 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.08310.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.083 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.00110.1016/j.joule.2020.01.001 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-020-15355-010.1038/s41467-020-15355-0 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41893-020-00664-510.1038/s41893-020-00664-5 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41560-018-0214-010.1038/s41560-018-0214-0 ↗
11. 10.1039/C9TA14003D10.1039/C9TA14003D ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0246110.1021/acsenergylett.0c02461 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-018-07975-410.1038/s41467-018-07975-4 ↗
14. 10.1039/D1EE01113H10.1039/D1EE01113H ↗
15. 10.1039/D1TA01545A10.1039/D1TA01545A ↗
16. 10.1039/C9EE00578A10.1039/C9EE00578A ↗
17. 10.1002/ange.20200863410.1002/ange.202008634 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.03.01110.1016/j.joule.2020.03.011 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8EE01503A10.1039/C8EE01503A ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20210209610.1002/aenm.202102096 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.00810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.008 ↗
22. 10.1126/sciadv.aat538310.1126/sciadv.aat5383 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0516410.1021/acs.chemmater.9b05164 ↗
24. 10.1039/D1TA02779D10.1039/D1TA02779D ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0089310.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00893 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20170723410.1002/adfm.201707234 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.6b0415810.1021/acsami.6b04158 ↗
28. 10.1002/ange.20201381210.1002/ange.202013812 ↗
29. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.6910.1038/nenergy.2017.69 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20180220710.1002/aenm.201802207 ↗
31. 10.1002/ente.20180101310.1002/ente.201801013 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.00210.1016/j.chempr.2018.05.002 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20220086210.1002/aenm.202200862 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.03410.1016/j.ensm.2021.10.034 ↗
35. 10.1002/smtd.20210016810.1002/smtd.202100168 ↗
36. 10.1002/ange.20220790710.1002/ange.202207907 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41560-019-0349-710.1038/s41560-019-0349-7 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.00910.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.009 ↗