Efficient and Stable Colloidal Quantum Dot Solar Cells with a Green‐Solvent Hole‐Transport Layer
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Next‐generation solution‐processed solar cells will hopefully be processed using green solvents, and will unite high performance with operating stability. Colloidal quantum dot/polymer hybrid solar cells are of interest for their harvest of the visible as well as the near infrared; however, today's best polymer hole‐transporting layers (HTLs) rely on processing using hazardous solvents such as chlorobenzene. This stems from the strong polymer–polymer attraction in polymeric p‐type materials, which accounts for their limited solubility. Here, a new random polymeric HTL (asy‐ranPBTBDT) is reported that is soluble in green solvents such as 2‐methylanisole without compromising ultimate device power conversion efficiency. The new polymer structure induces a strong π–π stacking face‐on orientation and less lateral grain growth compared to control asy‐PBTBDT, leading to reduced charge recombination and improved device stability. The resulting device exhibits a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.2% and retains 89% of its initial efficiency after 120 h of continuous device operation at the maximum power point, compared to a PCE of 11.4% and 71% degradation for control devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) 77 Cheongam‐Ro, Nam‐Gu Pohang Gyeongbuk 37673 Korea
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto 10 King's College Road Toronto ON M5S 3G4 Canada
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Dongguk University Seoul 04620 Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Education
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Yuan M. · Nat. Energy · 2016 · 1 · 1
2. 10.1186/s40580-017-0115-010.1186/s40580-017-0115-0 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41565-018-0117-z10.1038/s41565-018-0117-z ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0230110.1021/acsenergylett.9b02301 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20170251210.1002/aenm.201702512 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0376110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03761 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.5b1022810.1021/acsami.5b10228 ↗
8. 10.1039/C7TA07014D10.1039/C7TA07014D ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20180057210.1002/aenm.201800572 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0230110.1021/acsenergylett.9b02301 ↗
11. Mubarok M. A. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 1902933
12. 10.1039/C7EE03184J10.1039/C7EE03184J ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20190293310.1002/aenm.201902933 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-019-0492-110.1038/s41560-019-0492-1 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-019-13437-210.1038/s41467-019-13437-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.02.01910.1016/j.mattod.2016.02.019 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20150217710.1002/aenm.201502177 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.7b0494910.1021/jacs.7b04949 ↗
19. 10.1021/ma60012a02110.1021/ma60012a021 ↗
20. 10.1039/C8TA00479J10.1039/C8TA00479J ↗
21. 10.1039/C8TA10015B10.1039/C8TA10015B ↗
22. 10.1021/jacs.6b0104610.1021/jacs.6b01046 ↗
23. 10.1039/C9PY00461K10.1039/C9PY00461K ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20190182910.1002/aenm.201901829 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20130086410.1002/aenm.201300864 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma202685j10.1021/ma202685j ↗
27. 10.1038/pj.2016.10310.1038/pj.2016.103 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.6b0104610.1021/jacs.6b01046 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20130182310.1002/aenm.201301823 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20140177810.1002/aenm.201401778 ↗
31. 10.1289/ehp.7721710.1289/ehp.77217 ↗
32. 10.1039/C2GC36042J10.1039/C2GC36042J ↗
33. 10.1002/adma20130280210.1002/adma201302802 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat398410.1038/nmat3984 ↗