journal article·2025-12

Unveiling the Role of Critical Impurities in Spent LiFePO 4 Cathodes for Scalable Direct Regeneration

Luqi Zhang, Hongpeng Gao, Yuwei Zhu, Ich Tran, Wei Tang, Jiao Lin, Anthony U. Mu, Junlin Wu, Wei Li, Dennis Nordlund, Linqin Mu, Zheng Chen

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 15· Issue 46
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Direct regeneration offers a promising alternative to recycling End‐of‐Life (EoL) batteries by restoring metal elements and preserving the material structure, yet scaling these technologies to handle practical cathode black mass (CBM) with impurities remains challenging. This study investigates the evolution of impurities, including aluminum (Al), polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) binder, and residual carbon (C), during direct recycling of spent LiFePO 4 (LFP) cathodes and their impact on electrochemical performance. Using various ex situ and in situ analyses, it is shown that the formation of lithium fluoride (LiF) during the traditional direct recycling process hinders lithium diffusion and deteriorates the reversible capacity. To address this major challenge, the combination of pH‐controlled hydrothermal purification and the two‐step sintering process is proposed effectively to regenerate spent LFP cathodes, eliminating the negative effect of Al and fluorine (F) impurities while mitigating any potential impacts of carbon residuals. The regenerated LFP from spent CBM achieves superior performance, retaining 152.5 mAh g −1 at 0.1 C and 133 mAh g −1 at 1 C with 98.7% capacity retention after 200 cycles. This approach is further validated using three distinct waste feedstocks from battery modules, enhancing impurity management and scalability in direct recycling. These findings present a sustainable and economically viable solution for large‐scale LFP regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extraction and Separation Processes · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Aiiso Yufeng Li Family Department of Chemical and Nano Engineering University of California San Diego La Jolla CA 92093 USA

Program of Materials Science and Engineering University of California San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla CA 92093 USA

School for Engineering of Matter Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University Tempe AZ 85287 USA

Irvine Material Research Institute University of California Irvine Irvine CA 92697 USA

Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Menlo Park CA 94025 USA

Sustainable Power & Energy Center (SPEC) University of California San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla CA 92093 USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy · California Energy Commission · Basic Energy Sciences · National Science Foundation

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.esr.2024.10137910.1016/j.esr.2024.101379 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.10.02710.1016/j.matt.2020.10.027 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.01410.1016/j.joule.2019.09.014 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.11610.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.116 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20220290610.1002/aenm.202202906 ↗
6. Fleischmann J. · McKinsey Company · 2023 · 2
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0260210.1021/acsenergylett.1c02602 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.09.01310.1016/j.chempr.2021.09.013 ↗
9. 10.1557/s43579-024-00644-210.1557/s43579-024-00644-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nxener.2023.10009110.1016/j.nxener.2023.100091 ↗
11. 10.1002/gch2.20220009910.1002/gch2.202200099 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10087510.1016/j.coelec.2021.100875 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20221316810.1002/adfm.202213168 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10347510.1016/j.ensm.2024.103475 ↗
15. 10.1002/batt.20240012010.1002/batt.202400120 ↗
16. 10.1038/s42004-023-00844-210.1038/s42004-023-00844-2 ↗
17. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0040410.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00404 ↗
18. 10.1080/09593330.2014.96262110.1080/09593330.2014.962621 ↗
19. 10.1002/aenm.20220309310.1002/aenm.202203093 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10574110.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105741 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20240505510.1002/adfm.202405055 ↗
22. Song S. · ChemSusChem · 2024 · 18 · 3
23. 10.1021/acsami.0c1570410.1021/acsami.0c15704 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.02410.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.024 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0292310.1021/acsaem.1c02923 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.13986310.1016/j.electacta.2022.139863 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.00810.1016/j.joule.2020.10.008 ↗
28. Roberge P. R. & Eng P. (2008). Corrosion engineering. New York NY USA: McGraw‐Hill.
29. 10.1016/j.mtener.2023.10137410.1016/j.mtener.2023.101374 ↗
30. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0305410.1021/acssuschemeng.9b03054 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15329210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153292 ↗
32. 10.1021/es950699m10.1021/es950699m ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.02.01410.1016/j.jaap.2012.02.014 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jaap.2016.10.02710.1016/j.jaap.2016.10.027 ↗
35. 10.1007/s42114-021-00217-010.1007/s42114-021-00217-0 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.33194910.1063/1.331949 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1016410.1021/acsnano.4c10164 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.8b1001610.1021/acsami.8b10016 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.3c1439410.1021/acsami.3c14394 ↗