journal article·2012-12

Definition of a laboratory optimization protocol for road bitumen improved with recycled tire rubber

Bernardo Celauro, Clara Celauro, Davide Lo Presti, Antonio Bevilacqua

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Bearing in mind the need to answer one of the most frequent needs for civil construction, in general, and major project such as road infrastructures in particular, this paper presents the results of a laboratory experimental study in order to evaluate the performance improvement that is possible to achieve when modifying road bitumen with CRM (Crumb Rubber Modifier) from discarded tire rubber (TR), using a Wet Process. The environmental advantage is double, since the aim of the research is to obtain high performance road bitumen thanks to the re-use of a discarded material, such as the rubber tires, which otherwise would be dumped in scrap-yard. In particular, this experimental study aimed to define a laboratory optimization protocol that allowed to discriminate amongst the different asphalt–rubber blends, in relation to the different content of rubber, as well as to the blending times, with the possibility of carefully controlling the production temperature throughout the production process. In order to do this, simple and widespread laboratory equipments and procedures have been adopted, such as the Brookfield rotational viscometer, capable of ensuring the representativeness of the final product to be tested. After the optimization study, a comparison was made between the conventional and rheological properties of the optimized rubber–asphalt blend with those of two commercially available PMBs, modified with synthetic rubber type Styrene–Butadiene–Styrene, with two different level of modification: a medium and a high level of polymer, respectively termed as “Medium” and “High” in this study. This comparison allows one to appreciate to what extent control of the modification process is able to affect the properties of the final product and shows that the preliminary optimization of the mixing parameters carried out with the proposed protocol allows one to obtain a rubber–bitumen blend with improved performances, above all reduced temperature susceptibility, as proved by an increase in the Superpave™ high temperature performance grading, up to a two grade jump, which it is possible to obtain only for SBS modified bitumen with high content of polymer. Therefore, this study proves that, thanks to the appropriate re-use of crumb rubber form scrap tires, with the proposed optimization protocol it is possible obtain improved bitumen with high content of recycled materials that, with respect to specific needs of regions with warm climates such as the Mediterranean area, can be considered as “high-performance blends”.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Esch DC. Construction and benefits of rubber-modified asphalt pavements. Report N AK-RD-82-17, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Fairbanks; 1982.
2. Epps JA. Uses of recycled rubber tires in highways. NCHRP Report. In: Synthesis of highway practice no.198, TRB National Research Council. Washington, DC; 1994.
3. The influence of ageing on dry process crumb rubber modified asphalt mixtures
4. Celauro B, Celauro C, Di Francisca A, Giuffrè O. Effect of the construction process on the performance of asphalt paving mixes with crumb rubber from scrap tires. In: 3rd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Proc., Vienna; 2004. p. 757–69.
5. Airey GD, Collop AC, Mujibur MM. Mechanical properties of crumb rubber modified asphalt mixtures. In: 3rd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Proc., Vienna; 2004. p. 800–12.
6. Amirkhanian SN. Utilization of crumb rubber in asphaltic concrete mixtures-south carolina experience. South Carolina DOT, South Carolina, USA; 2001.
7. Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifiers (CRM) on performance related properties of asphalt binders
8. Sousa J, Way GB. Models for estimating treatment lives, pavement life extention and the cost effectiness of treatments on flexible pavements, vol. 2; 2009. .
9. ASTM standard specification for asphalt–rubber binder. Designation ASTM D6114/D6114M – 09, US, American Society for Testing and Materials; 2009.
10. Development of rubber and asphalt binders by depolymerization and devulcanization of scrap tires in asphalt10.1177/0361198196153000107 ↗
11. Pavlovich RD, Shuler TS, Rosner JC. Chemical & physical properties of asphalt rubber mixtures – Phase II: Product specifications and test procedures. Arizona. Arizona Department of Transportation, FHWA/AZ-79/121; 1979.
12. Characteristics of asphalt–rubber by the sliding plate microviscometer
13. Investigation of the curing variables of asphalt–rubber binder10.1080/10916469708949669 ↗
14. Influence of processing conditions on the rheological behavior of crumb tire rubber-modified bitumen10.1002/app.25800 ↗
15. Advances in technology of asphalt paving materials containing used tire rubber
16. Roberts FL, Kandhal PS, Brown ER, Dunning RL. Investigation and evaluation of ground tire rubber in hot-mix asphalt. NCAT, Auburn University, Alabama; 1989.
17. ASTM. Standard test method for separation of asphalt into four fractions. Designation ASTM D4124-01, US, American Society for Testing and Materials; 2001.
18. Hicks RG. Asphalt rubber design and construction guidelines. Design Guidelines, vol. 1. NCRACTC and CIWMB; 2002.
19. EN. European Standard 1426. Methods of tests for petroleum and its products. Bitumen and bituminous binders. Determination of needle penetration. Brussels CEN; 2000a.
20. EN. European Standard 1427. Methods of test for petroleum and its products. Bitumen and bituminous binders. Determination of softening point. Ring and ball method. Brussels CEN; 2000b.
21. EN. European Standard 13302. Bitumen and bituminous binders - Determination of viscosity of bitumen using a rotating spindle apparatus. Brussels CEN; 2003.
22. Tayebali AA, Vyas BB, Malpass GA. Effect of crumb rubber particle size and concentration on performance grading of rubber modified asphalt binders. In: Jester RN editor, Progress of SUPERPAVE: Evaluation and Implementation ASTM STP 1322; 1997. p. 30–47.10.1520/STP12078S ↗
23. AASHTO TP5 Standard test method for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). AASHTO; 1998.
24. Lo Presti D, Memon N, Airey G, Grenfell J. Comparison between bitumen modified with crumb tire rubber and stirene butadiene styrene. MAIREPAV 6 Proc., Turin, Italy; 2009. p. 54–63.
25. Bahia HU, Zeng M, Zhai H, Khatri MA. Superpave protocols for modified asphalt binders. In: 15th Quarterly Progress Report for NCHRP Project 9-10. Washington DC; 1999.
26. Bahia HU, Hanson DI, Zeng M, Zhai H, Khatri MA, Anderson RM. Characterization of modified asphalt binders in Superpave mix design. NCHRP Report 459. Washington DC; 2001.
27. Refinement of the superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalts10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(357) ↗
28. Enhancing the performance of crumb rubber-modified binders through varying the interaction conditions10.1080/10298430802343177 ↗
29. Quality control requirements for using crumb rubber modified bitumen (CRMB)
30. Tabatabaee N, Karami S, Kamali Abyaneh Z. The effect of mixing time on the viscosity of CRM binders. In: 3rd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress Proc., Vienna; 2004. p. 881–8.