Bond stress between conventional reinforcement and steel fibre reinforced reactive powder concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, we investigated bond stress between steel-fibre-reinforced reactive powder concrete (SF-RPC) and conventional reinforcement to determine specific values for design bond stress. Test results were compared with previously suggested analysis methods. Tests were carried out using the direct pull-out test. The main variables are compressive strength of the concrete, concrete cover, and inclusion ratio of steel fibre. The increase rate of ultimate bond stress between SF-RPC and conventional reinforcement was decreased although the ultimate bond stress was increased with increasing compressive strength of the SF-RPC matrix. The effect of the concrete cover on ultimate bond stress and its increase rate was similar to that of the compressive strength of concrete. However, an even more significant change was observed with change in concrete cover. We also observed an effect of steel fibre inclusion. Inclusion of a 1% volume fraction of steel fibre increases the ultimate bond stress by two times the bond stress between the plain RPC matrix and conventional reinforcement. However, a 2% steel fibre volume fraction does not increase the ultimate bond stress significantly. In order to obtain safety for bond design of SF-RPC precast members, previously suggested analysis methods for ultimate bond stress and empirical equations for ultimate bond stress were evaluated. Most empirical ultimate bond stress equations cannot estimate the ultimate bond stress accurately. Analysis methods suggested by Tepfers can predict the ultimate bond stress more accurately than these empirical equations because the RPC matrix behaves as a linear elastic material until experiencing splitting failure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. AFGC Groupe de travail BFUP. SETRA-AFGC · 2002
2. Japan Concrete Institute Standard, Method of Test for Load-Displacement Curve of Fiber Reinforced Concrete by Use of Notched Beam, JCI-S-002-2003, 2003, 6 p.
3. Reactive powder concretes with high ductility and 200–800MPa compressive strength
4. ACI Committee 318 · 2011
5. ACI Committee 408 · 2001
6. Korea Concrete Institute · 2012
7. Canadian Standards Association CSA, Design of Concrete Structures for Buildings, CAN3-A23.3-94, Ontario, Canada, 1994.
8. NewZealand Standard · 2006
9. European Committee for Standardization · 2004
10. Park · 1975
11. Cracking of concrete cover along anchored deformed reinforcing bars10.1680/macr.1979.31.106.3 ↗
12. Eligehausen · 1983
13. Local bond strength of reinforcing bars in normal strength and high-strength concrete (HSC)
14. Huang · 1996
15. A reevaluation of test data on development length and splices
16. CEB-FIP · 1990
17. Fédération Internationale du Béton (fib), Model Code 2010 – Final Draft, vol. 1, fédération internationale du béton, Bulletin 65, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2012, 350 p.
18. Studies on the pull-out strength of ribbed bars in high-strength concrete
19. Bond performance of reinforcing bars embedded in high strength concrete
20. KS F 2441 · 2010
21. Behavior of spliced reinforcing bars embedded in high strength concrete