Evaluation of particle simulation methods using aggregate angularity and slump tests
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, three particle simulation methods were rigorously evaluated using several quantitative metrics to verify their feasibility for aggregate packing and mixing simulations in which determining the volumetric properties under multiple phases and conditions is essential. The physical properties and representative volume of each size of aggregate were determined by laboratory tests and image processing techniques. The sieve size sphere method, equivalent sphere method, and equivalent ellipsoid method were used with several combinations of friction coefficients to determine the significance of the particle simulation method on the dynamic aggregate behavior in discrete element method (DEM) simulations. The measured weight, height, diameter of the aggregate spread, and falling time duration from laboratory aggregate slump tests and aggregate angularity tests were compared to those from DEM simulations. The comparisons between the laboratory tests and simulations indicate that the aggregate angularity test and aggregate slump test were sufficiently accurate to capture the effect of the aggregate size on the dynamic behavior. No particle simulation method satisfied all of the conditions as well as the aggregate slump test and angularity test results, such as height, spread, weight, and simulation time; however, most of the particle simulation methods had good potential to simulate individual laboratory tests. Therefore, a more realistic particle simulation method that is capable of considering the morphological characteristics of aggregates should be developed to successfully perform packing and mixing simulations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Granular flow and fluidized beds · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Mineral Processing and Grinding
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Furnas CC. Flow of gasses through beds of broken solids. Bur Mines Bull 1929;307.
2. Effect de Paroi dans le Empilements Desordonnes de Spheres et Application a la Porosite de Melanges Benaires
3. Toufar W, Born M, Klose E. Beitrag zur Optimierung der Packungsuichte Polydisperser korniger Systeme. Freiberger Froschungsheft A 558, VEB Deutscher Verlagfur Grundstoffindustrie, 1976:29–44.
4. Linear packing density model of grain mixtures10.1016/0032-5910(86)80058-4 ↗
5. Andersen PK, Johansen V. A guide to determining the optimal gradation of concrete aggregates. SHRP-C-334. Washington (DC); 1993.
6. Larrard · 1999
7. Frost · 1996
8. Technical and computational aspects of the measurement of aggregate shape by digital image analysis10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:1(10) ↗
9. Automatic image analysis in evaluation of aggregate shape10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:2(123) ↗
10. Ormel TJ. Modeling asphalt with discrete and continuum methods. University of Twente; 2012.
11. Discrete element method (DEM) modeling of fracture and damage in the machining process of polycrystalline SiC10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.07.060 ↗
12. A bonded-particle model for rock10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.011 ↗
13. An efficient technique for generating homogeneous specimens for DEM studies10.1016/S0266-352X(03)00064-8 ↗
14. Packing spherical discrete elements for large scale simulations10.1016/j.cma.2010.01.016 ↗
15. Evaluation of styrene-butadiene latex as a vibration damping admixture for concrete: a micromechanical analysis
16. Dynamic simulation of random packing of spherical particles10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00178-3 ↗
17. Ashmawy A, Sukumaran B, Hoang V. Evaluating the Influence of particle shape on liquefaction behavior using discrete element modeling. In: Proceedings of The thirteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference; 2003.
18. Discrete element modeling: impact of aggregate sphericity, orientation, and angularity on creep stiffness of idealized asphalt mixture
19. Characterization of the packing of aggregate in concrete by a discrete element approach10.1016/j.matchar.2009.02.012 ↗
20. Estimation of bulk density distribution in particle charging process using discrete element method considering particle shape
21. Application of discrete element method to superpave gyratory compaction10.1080/14680629.2012.694160 ↗
22. Microstructural modeling of cement-based materials via random packing of three-dimensional ellipsoidal particles10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.460 ↗
23. Investigation of adequacy of multi-shphere approximation of elliptical particles for DEM simulations10.1007/s10035-009-0158-y ↗
24. Influence of grain shape and intergranular friction on material behavior in uniaxial compression: experimental and DEM modeling10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.060 ↗
25. Chen J. Discrete element method (DEM) analyses for hot-mix asphalt (HMA) Mixture Compaction University of Tennessee; 2011.
26. Lee H, Chou E. Survey of image processing applications in civil engineering digital image processing: techniques and applications in civil engineering. In: ASCE Proceedings of the EF/NSF conference; 1993. p. 203–10.
27. ASTM C143. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic cement concrete.
28. Janoo · 1998
29. Kim YR. Souza LT. Effect of aggregate angularity on mix design characteristic and pavement performance. Mid-America Transportation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. MPM-10; 2009.
30. Determination of DEM input parameters for dynamic behavior simulation for aggregates10.7855/IJHE.2014.16.1.021 ↗
31. AASHTO T 326. Standard Method of Test for Uncompact Void Contents of Coarse Aggregate (As influenced by particle shape, surface texture, and grading).
32. Yun T, Ahn SH, Nam JH, Yoo PJ. Simulation of aggregate slump test using equivalent sphere particle in DEM. Int J Highway Eng 2013;15;5;21–29.10.7855/IJHE.2013.15.5.021 ↗
33. Fewell MP. Area of common overlap of three circles. Australian Government Department of Defense. DSTO-TN-0722; 2006.
34. Huang H. Discrete element modeling of railroad ballast using imaging based aggregate morphology characterization University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2010.
35. Johnstone, MW. Calibration of DEM models for granular materials using bulk physical tests. Dissertation. The University of Edinburgh; 2010.
36. Zelelew HM. Simulation of the permanent deformation of asphalt concrete mixtures using discrete element method (DEM). Washington State University; 2008.
37. Stroeven. P, He H, Stroeven, M. Discrete element modelling approach to assessment of granular properties in concrete. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2011;12;5;335–344.10.1631/jzus.A1000223 ↗
38. The use of digital images to determine deformation throughout a microstructure. Part I. Deformation mapping technique10.1023/A:1004874911909 ↗
39. Microstructure and transport properties of porous building materials. II: Three-dimensional X-ray tomographic studies10.1007/BF02479408 ↗