journal article·2023-01Open access

Is Nonflammability of Electrolyte Overrated in the Overall Safety Performance of Lithium Ion Batteries? A Sobering Revelation from a Completely Nonflammable Electrolyte

Hao Jia, Zhijie Yang, Yaobin Xu, Peiyuan Gao, Lirong Zhong, David J. Kautz, Dengguo Wu, Ben Fliegler, Mark H. Engelhard, Bethany E. Matthews, Benjamin Broekhuis, Xia Cao, Jiang Fan, Chongmin Wang, Feng Lin, Wu Xu

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 13· Issue 4

Abstract

Abstract It has been widely assumed that the flammability of the liquid electrolyte is one of the most influential factors that determine the safety of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs). Following this consideration, a completely nonflammable electrolyte is designed and adopted for graphite||LiFePO4 (Gr||LFP) batteries. Contrary to the conventional understanding, the completely nonflammable electrolyte with phosphorus‐containing solvents exhibits inferior safety performance in commercial Gr||LFP batteries, in comparison to the flammable conventional LiPF6‐organocarbonate electrolyte. Mechanistic studies identify the exothermic reactions between the electrolyte (especially the salt LiFSI) and the charged electrodes as the “culprit” behind this counterintuitive phenomenon. The discovery emphasizes the importance of reducing the electrolyte reactivity when designing safe electrolytes, as well as the necessity of evaluating safety performance of electrolytes on a battery level.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Energy and Environment Directorate Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA 99354 USA

Department of Chemistry Virginia Tech Blacksburg VA 24061 USA

Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA 99354 USA

Physical and Computational Sciences Directorate Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA 99354 USA

American Lithium Energy Corporation Carlsbad CA 92008 USA

McKetta Department of Chemical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.11.04210.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.11.042 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0218810.1021/acsaem.9b02188 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00537-210.1016/S0378-7753(02)00537-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.00110.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.05.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.00710.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.007 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.018 ↗
7. 10.1002/anie.20210240310.1002/anie.202102403 ↗
8. 10.1149/1.139777310.1149/1.1397773 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.coelec.2021.10078110.1016/j.coelec.2021.100781 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0242810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02428 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41560-019-0336-z10.1038/s41560-019-0336-z ↗
12. 10.1038/s41560-018-0196-y10.1038/s41560-018-0196-y ↗
13. 10.1002/anie.20220369310.1002/anie.202203693 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-017-0033-810.1038/s41560-017-0033-8 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20200309210.1002/aenm.202003092 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0192610.1021/acsenergylett.9b01926 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.aab159510.1126/science.aab1595 ↗
18. 10.1149/1945-7111/abd60e10.1149/1945-7111/abd60e ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.0c1817710.1021/acsami.0c18177 ↗
20. 10.1246/cl.2010.75310.1246/cl.2010.753 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0064535410.1007/BF00645354 ↗
22. Atkins P. · 2014
23. 10.1038/s41467-021-24404-110.1038/s41467-021-24404-1 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20210229910.1002/aenm.202102299 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.00110.1016/j.ensm.2021.02.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.03910.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.039 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.8b1550510.1021/acsami.8b15505 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.1c1207210.1021/acsami.1c12072 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23117110.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231171 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41467-020-18868-w10.1038/s41467-020-18868-w ↗