journal article·2022-11

Desymmetrization of Viologen Anolytes Empowering Energy Dense, Ultra Stable Flow Batteries toward Long‐Duration Energy Storage

Maowei Hu, Wenda Wu, Jian Luo, T. Leo Liu

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 12· Issue 41
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Aqueous organic redox flow batteries (AORFBs) have been recognized as a promising technology for large‐scale, long‐duration energy storage of renewables (e.g., solar and wind) by overcoming their intermittence and fluctuation. However, simultaneous demonstration of high energy densities and stable cycling are still challenging for AORFBs. Herein, asymmetrically substituted sulfonate viologen molecular designs, e.g. (1‐[3‐sulfonatopropyl]‐1′‐[4‐sulfonatobutane]‐4,4′‐bipyridinium (3,4‐S2V), as capacity dense, chemically stable anolytes for cation exchange AORFBs are presented. The robust cycling performance of 3,4‐S2V is confirmed using half‐cell and full‐cell flow battery studies at pH neutral conditions. The 3,4‐S2V based AORFB is demonstrated with a discharge capacity of 23.2 Ah L−1 for 1700 cycles or 100 days without observing chemical degradation. Furthermore, a 3,4‐S2V/(NH4)4[Fe(CN)6] AORFB with a discharge capacity of 259.9 mAh is demonstrated for 50 days of authentic energy storage for the first time with a total capacity retention of 97.77% or a temporal capacity retention rate of 99.955% per day, representing the most stable, longest cycled AORFB to date.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Utah State University Logan UT 84318 USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · Utah State University

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aam628410.1126/science.aam6284 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0133210.1021/acsenergylett.9b01332 ↗
3. 2011
4. 10.1002/adfm.20120069410.1002/adfm.201200694 ↗
5. Hu B. · 2019 · 1
6. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.05710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.057 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0065010.1021/acsenergylett.7b00650 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6EE02057G10.1039/C6EE02057G ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.6b1098410.1021/jacs.6b10984 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.01010.1016/j.joule.2018.10.010 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.00110.1016/j.chempr.2017.11.001 ↗
12. 10.1002/aenm.20200010010.1002/aenm.202000100 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.0351704jes10.1149/2.0351704jes ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20190003910.1002/aenm.201900039 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560-018-0167-310.1038/s41560-018-0167-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.02310.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.023 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.abd979510.1126/science.abd9795 ↗
18. 10.1002/anie.20160647210.1002/anie.201606472 ↗
19. 10.1039/C8CC02336K10.1039/C8CC02336K ↗
20. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.02110.1016/j.chempr.2019.04.021 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0001910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00019 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.05710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.057 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0130210.1021/acsenergylett.7b01302 ↗
24. 10.1039/C7TA06573F10.1039/C7TA06573F ↗
25. 10.1021/jp811388w10.1021/jp811388w ↗