journal article·2014-08Open access

Mesoporous TiO2 Beads Offer Improved Mass Transport for Cobalt‐Based Redox Couples Leading to High Efficiency Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells

Leo‐Philipp Heiniger, Fabrizio Giordano, Thomas Moehl, Michael Grätzel

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 4· Issue 12

Abstract

Overcoming ionic diffusion limitations is essential for the development of high‐efficiency dye‐sensitized solar cells based on cobalt redox mediators. Here, improved mass transport is reported for photoanodes composed of mesoporous TiO2 beads of varying pore sizes and porosities in combination with the high extinction YD2‐o‐C8 porphyrin dye. Compared to a photoanode made of 20 nm‐sized TiO2 particles, electrolyte diffusion through these films is greatly improved due to the large interstitial pores between the TiO2 beads, resulting in up to 70% increase in diffusion‐limited current. Simultaneously, transient photocurrent measurements reveal no mass transport limitations for films of up to 10 μm thickness. In contrast, standard photoanodes made of 20 nm‐sized TiO2 particles show non‐linear behavior in photocurrent under 1 sun illumination for a film thickness as low as 7 μm. By including a transparent thin mesoporous TiO2 underlayer in order to reduce optical losses at the fluorine‐doped tin oxide (FTO)‐TiO2 interface, an efficiency of 11.4% under AM1.5G 1 sun illumination is achieved. The combination of high surface area, strong scattering behavior, and high porosity makes these mesoporous TiO2 beads particularly suitable for dye‐sensitized solar cells using bulky redox couples and/or viscous electrolytes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Photonics and Interfaces Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne 1015 Lausanne Switzerland

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation · European Research Council · Romanian-Swiss Research Program (RSRP)

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nchem.14110.1038/nchem.141 ↗
2. 10.1038/353737a010.1038/353737a0 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr900356p10.1021/cr900356p ↗
4. 10.1126/science.120968810.1126/science.1209688 ↗
5. 10.1038/nature1234010.1038/nature12340 ↗
6. 10.1021/ar900138m10.1021/ar900138m ↗
7. Bonhôte P. · 10th International Conference on Photochemical Conversion and Storage of Solar Energy (IPS‐10) · 1994
8. 10.1021/jp012075a10.1021/jp012075a ↗
9. 10.1021/jp004411d10.1021/jp004411d ↗
10. Yang X. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012
11. 10.1039/c2ee23081j10.1039/c2ee23081j ↗
12. 10.1039/C0EE00251H10.1039/C0EE00251H ↗
13. 10.1021/ja100396n10.1021/ja100396n ↗
14. 10.1021/ja027355y10.1021/ja027355y ↗
15. 10.1021/jp206139210.1021/jp2061392 ↗
16. 10.1021/ja108886910.1021/ja1088869 ↗
17. 10.1002/cssc.20110012010.1002/cssc.201100120 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp903431s10.1021/jp903431s ↗
19. 10.1021/jp908442p10.1021/jp908442p ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20130235210.1002/adfm.201302352 ↗
21. 10.1021/jp807395g10.1021/jp807395g ↗
22. 10.1021/nl301023r10.1021/nl301023r ↗
23. 10.1021/jp806479k10.1021/jp806479k ↗
24. 10.1002/cphc.20120043510.1002/cphc.201200435 ↗
25. 10.1039/c1cc14991a10.1039/c1cc14991a ↗
26. 10.1246/cl.13003810.1246/cl.130038 ↗
27. 10.1039/b911397p10.1039/b911397p ↗
28. 10.1021/jp202573610.1021/jp2025736 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20080260310.1002/adma.200802603 ↗
30. 10.1021/ja100040p10.1021/ja100040p ↗
31. 10.1021/nn101039610.1021/nn1010396 ↗
32. 10.1002/chem.20120253910.1002/chem.201202539 ↗
33. Crystallite sizes were calculated via the Scherrer equation and averaged over the 6 most intense diffraction peaks. A shape factor of 0.9 was assumed and the diffractograms were corrected for instrumental broadening.
34. 10.1039/b505718c10.1039/b505718c ↗
35. 10.1016/S0927-0248(98)00078-610.1016/S0927-0248(98)00078-6 ↗
36. 10.1039/b418658n10.1039/b418658n ↗
37. 10.1039/C0JM02606A10.1039/C0JM02606A ↗
38. 10.1002/cssc.20110006010.1002/cssc.201100060 ↗
39. Bohren C. F. · 1983
40. 10.1149/1.157003210.1149/1.1570032 ↗
41. 10.1039/c2jm35245a10.1039/c2jm35245a ↗
42. 10.1063/1.181274110.1063/1.1812741 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp980819n10.1021/jp980819n ↗
44. 10.1021/nn203416d10.1021/nn203416d ↗
45. H. N.Tsao R.Humphry‐Baker A.Yella L.Steier M.Grätzel unpublished.
46. In order to exclude any adverse impact on the catalytic activity of the platinum no TiCl4treatment was applied and no dye adsorbed onto the films. Likewise 4 5‐nonylpyridine was omitted as an additive since results were found to be less reproducible. We point out that both TiCl4treatment and a dye monolayer additionally reduce the porosity of the film and the addition of 4 5‐nonylpyridine further increases the viscosity of the electrolyte.[41 43] The observed diffusion‐limited currents can therefore be considered as an upper limit
47. Bard A. J. · 2001
48. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.16610.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.166 ↗
49. 10.1021/jp061346k10.1021/jp061346k ↗
50. 10.1021/jp073056p10.1021/jp073056p ↗
51. Marszalek M. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2013
52. Along with the large porosity a more homogeneous light absorption profile in the films composed of mesoporous beads might additionally alleviate diffusion problems. In a standard electrode most of the light is absorbed close to the FTO substrate and therefore Co3+has to diffuse all the way through the mesoporous film to the counter electrode. Due to strong light scattering Co3+is produced more evenly throughout the film in case of mesoporous beads.
53. 10.1021/ja311743m10.1021/ja311743m ↗
54. 10.1021/jp035928310.1021/jp0359283 ↗
55. 10.1021/jz400084n10.1021/jz400084n ↗
56. 10.1021/jp800426y10.1021/jp800426y ↗
57. The SoA film is composed of 4 μm of scattering layer (CCIC 400 nm) over 4 μm of transparent layer (DSL18).
58. 10.1021/ja01145a12610.1021/ja01145a126 ↗