Determination of plastic hinge properties for static nonlinear analysis of FRP-strengthened circular columns in bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
In the recent years, rehabilitation of structures, strengthening and increasing the ductility of them under seismic loads have become so vital that many studies has been carried out on the retrofit of steel and concrete members so far. Bridge piers are very important members concerning rehabilitation, in which the plastic hinging zone is very vulnerable. Pier is usually confined by special stirrups predicted in the design procedure; moreover, fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) jackets are used after construction to confine the pier. FRP wrapping of the piers is one of the most effective ways of increasing moment and ductility capacity of them, which has a growing application due to its relative advantages. In many earthquake-resistant bridges, reinforced concrete columns have a major defect which could be retrofitted in different ways like using FRP. After rehabilitation, it is important to check the strengthening adequacy by dynamic nonlinear analysis and precise modeling of material properties. If the plastic hinge properties are simplified for the strengthened members, as the simplified properties which FEMA 356 proposes for non-strengthened members, static nonlinear analysis could be performed more easily. Current paper involves this matter and it is intended to determine the plastic hinge properties for static nonlinear analysis of the FRP-strengthened circular columns.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Struct. J. · 2003 · 100 · 215
2. Elsevier Science · 1994 · 2 · 1096
3. ACI Struct. J. · 2001 · 98 · 451
4. ACI J. · 1981 · 76 · 440
5. J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE · 1997 · 123 · 62410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(624) ↗
6. Eng. Struct. · 2006 · 28 · 149410.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.017 ↗
7. J. Mater. Civil Eng. · 1997 · 9 · 18510.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1997)9:4(185) ↗
8. J. Eng. Mech. · 1998 · 124 · 89210.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
9. Mech. Mater. · 2003 · 35 · 60310.1016/S0167-6636(02)00288-0 ↗
10. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2004 · 18 · 2110.12989/sem.2004.18.1.021 ↗
11. J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. · 2004 · 23 · 81110.1177/0731684404032865 ↗
12. J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE · 1988 · 114 · 180410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
13. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. · 2000 · 35 · 7910.1016/S0168-874X(99)00056-6 ↗
14. J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE · 1997 · 123 · 58310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:5(583) ↗
15. Compos. Part B.-Eng. · 2006 · 37 · 337
16. J. Struct. Div.-ASCE · 1992 · 118 · 159010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:6(1590) ↗
17. ACI Mater. J. · 1999 · 96 · 500
18. J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE · 1998 · 124 · 102510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:9(1025) ↗
19. Compos. Part B.-Eng. · 2000 · 31 · 47110.1016/S1359-8368(00)00021-4 ↗
20. J. Struct. Div.-ASCE · 1980 · 108 · 2073
21. ACI Mater. J. · 1999 · 96 · 397
22. Compos. Struct. · 2004 · 66 · 510.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.026 ↗
23. J. Mater. Civil Eng. · 2000 · 12 · 13910.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:2(139) ↗