journal article·2015-09-25

Prediction of curvature ductility factor for FRP strengthened RHSC beams using ANFIS and regression models

H. Ebrahimpour Komleh, A.A. Maghsoudi

Computers and Concrete· Volume 16· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Nowadays, fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites are widely used for rehabilitation, repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. Also, recent advances in concrete technology have led to the production of high strength concrete, HSC. Such concrete due to its very high compression strength is less ductile; so in seismic areas, ductility is an important factor in design of HSC members (especially FRP strengthened members) under flexure. In this study, the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and multiple regression analysis are used to predict the curvature ductility factor of FRP strengthened reinforced HSC (RHSC) beams. Also, the effects of concrete strength, steel reinforcement ratio and externally reinforcement (FRP) stiffness on the complete moment-curvature behavior and the curvature ductility factor of the FRP strengthened RHSC beams are evaluated using the analytical approach. Results indicate that the predictions of ANFIS and multiple regression models for the curvature ductility factor are accurate to within -0.22% and 1.87% error for practical applications respectively. Finally, the effects of height to wide ratio (h/b) of the cross section on the proposed models are investigated.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Mater. Design. · 2010 · 31 · 113010.1016/j.matdes.2009.09.041 ↗
2. Sci. Iran. Trans. A. · 2012 · 19 · 24210.1016/j.scient.2012.02.009 ↗
3. Expert. Syst Appl. · 2011 · 38 · 566210.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.069 ↗
4. J. Compos. Construct. · 2005 · 9 · 17010.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:2(170) ↗
5. Constr. Build. Mater. · 2008 · 22 · 202510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.027 ↗
6. Comput. Struct. · 2008 · 86 · 42710.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.024 ↗
7. Sci. Iran. Trans. A. · 2009 · 16 · 138
8. Comput. Concrete. · 2013 · 12 · 83110.12989/cac.2013.12.6.831 ↗
9. J. Compos. Constr. · 2007 · 11 · 4210.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(42) ↗
10. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2006 · 24 · 19510.12989/sem.2006.24.2.195 ↗
11. ACI. Struct. J. · 1998 · 95 · 142
12. Constr. Build. Mater. · 2013 · 40 · 81210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.109 ↗
13. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2013 · 45 · 319
14. Compos. Part. A. - Appl. S. · 2001 · 32 · 134510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00089-6 ↗
15. Eng Struct · 2003 · 25 · 37110.1016/S0141-0296(02)00172-4 ↗
16. J. Struct. Eng. · 2004 · 130 · 108710.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:7(1087) ↗
17. J. Mater. Civil. Eng. · 2002 · 14 · 23010.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(230) ↗
18. ACI. Struct. J. · 2005 · 102 · 462
19. Eng. Struct. · 2006 · 28 · 55710.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.011 ↗