High Sulfur Loading and Capacity Retention in Bilayer Garnet Sulfurized‐Polyacrylonitrile/Lithium‐Metal Batteries with Gel Polymer Electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The cubic‐garnet (Li7La3Zr2O12, LLZO) lithium–sulfur battery shows great promise in the pursuit of achieving high energy densities. The sulfur used in the cathodes is abundant, inexpensive, and possesses high specific capacity. In addition, LLZO displays excellent chemical stability with Li metal; however, the instabilities in the sulfur cathode/LLZO interface can lead to performance degradation that limits the development of these batteries. Therefore, it is critical to resolve these interfacial challenges to achieve stable cycling. Here, an innovative gel polymer buffer layer to stabilize the sulfur cathode/LLZO interface is created. Employing a thin bilayer LLZO (dense/porous) architecture as a solid electrolyte and significantly high sulfur loading of 5.2 mg cm−2, stable cycling is achieved with a high initial discharge capacity of 1542 mAh g−1 (discharge current density of 0.87 mA cm−2) and an average discharge capacity of 1218 mAh g−1 (discharge current density of 1.74 mA cm−2) with 80% capacity retention over 265 cycles, at room temperature (22 °C) and without applied pressure. Achieving such stability with high sulfur loading is a major step in the development of potentially commercial garnet lithium–sulfur batteries.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering The University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA
Maryland Energy Innovation Institute The University of Maryland College Park MD 20742 USA
Center for Neutron Research National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg MD 20899 USA
Funding
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C9CS00635D10.1039/C9CS00635D ↗
2. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.10310.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat319110.1038/nmat3191 ↗
4. 10.3390/en512519010.3390/en5125190 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0042710.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00427 ↗
6. Peng H. J. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2017 · 7 · 1
7. 10.1038/nmat306610.1038/nmat3066 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8EE01053F10.1039/C8EE01053F ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20070114410.1002/anie.200701144 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20130068010.1002/anie.201300680 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b0189510.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01895 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x10.1038/s41563-021-01019-x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.02.00710.1016/j.joule.2018.02.007 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat482110.1038/nmat4821 ↗
15. 10.1039/c4cs00020j10.1039/c4cs00020j ↗
16. 10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20220875110.1002/adfm.202208751 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10649810.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106498 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.00410.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.004 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7EE01004D10.1039/C7EE01004D ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.01510.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.015 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.00910.1016/j.ensm.2018.08.009 ↗
23. Fu Z. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2023 · 6 · 1
24. 10.1021/acsami.2c1408710.1021/acsami.2c14087 ↗
25. 10.1126/sciadv.aay275710.1126/sciadv.aay2757 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20190112510.1002/adma.201901125 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.02.00310.1016/j.jechem.2019.02.003 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.9b1143910.1021/acsami.9b11439 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.0c2291510.1021/acsami.0c22915 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.07410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.074 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.5b0811310.1021/jacs.5b08113 ↗
32. 10.1002/advs.20210112310.1002/advs.202101123 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0296610.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02966 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0469510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04695 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12772210.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127722 ↗
36. 10.1039/D1TC04015D10.1039/D1TC04015D ↗
37. 10.1002/aenm.20210099710.1002/aenm.202100997 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41560-020-0634-510.1038/s41560-020-0634-5 ↗
39. A. V.Naumkin A.Kraut‐Vass S. W.Gaarenstroom C. J.Powell “NIST X‐ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database20 Version 4.1” https://doi.org/10.18434/T4T88K (accessed: September 2012).
40. J.Moulder W.Stickle P.Sobol K.Bomben inHandbook of X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) 2005.
41. 10.1021/ja412807w10.1021/ja412807w ↗
42. 10.1021/jp501178n10.1021/jp501178n ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.02810.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.028 ↗
44. 10.1149/1.152678110.1149/1.1526781 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.06510.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.08.065 ↗
46. 10.1021/jp103742710.1021/jp1037427 ↗
47. 10.1039/c3cc46665e10.1039/c3cc46665e ↗
48. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.06210.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.062 ↗
49. 10.1021/ja203983r10.1021/ja203983r ↗
50. 10.1149/2.1031608jes10.1149/2.1031608jes ↗
51. 10.1039/C3EE42351D10.1039/C3EE42351D ↗
52. 10.1038/s41560-020-0601-110.1038/s41560-020-0601-1 ↗
53. 10.1126/sciadv.aau924510.1126/sciadv.aau9245 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41560-021-00792-y10.1038/s41560-021-00792-y ↗
55. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.10.02110.1016/j.matt.2020.10.021 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0038010.1021/acsenergylett.3c00380 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2021.10011210.1016/j.apsadv.2021.100112 ↗