journal article·2009-10-25

Maximum axial load level and minimum confinement for limited ductility design of high-strength concrete columns

J.Y.K. Lam, J.C.M. Ho, A.K.H. Kwan

Computers & concrete· Volume 6· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

In the design of concrete columns, it is important to provide some nominal flexural ductility even for structures not subjected to earthquake attack. Currently, the nominal flexural ductility is provided by imposing empirical deemed-to-satisfy rules, which limit the minimum size and maximum spacing of the confining reinforcement. However, these existing empirical rules have the major shortcoming that the actual level of flexural ductility provided is not consistent, being generally lower at higher concrete strength or higher axial load level. Hence, for high-strength concrete columns subjected to high axial loads, these existing rules are unsafe. Herein, the combined effects of concrete strength, axial load level, confining pressure and longitudinal steel ratio on the flexural ductility are evaluated using nonlinear moment-curvature analysis. Based on the numerical results, a new design method that provides a consistent level of nominal flexural ductility by imposing an upper limit to the axial load level or a lower limit to the confining pressure is developed. Lastly, two formulas and one design chart for direct evaluation of the maximum axial load level and minimum confining pressure are produced.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Comput. Concrete · 2006 · 3 · 26110.12989/cac.2006.3.4.261 ↗
2. Comput. Concrete · 2005 · 2 · 30910.12989/cac.2005.2.4.309 ↗
3. Comput. Concrete · 2004 · 1 · 11510.12989/cac.2004.1.2.115 ↗
4. ACI Mater. J. · 1996 · 93 · 432
5. ACI Struct. J. · 1997 · 94 · 708
6. J. Strut. Eng-ASCE · 1998 · 124 · 99910.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:9(999) ↗
7. Comput. Concrete · 2005 · 2 · 14710.12989/cac.2005.2.2.147 ↗
8. ACI ACE J. Proceed. · 1986 · 83 · 191
9. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2004 · 17 · 9910.12989/sem.2004.17.1.099 ↗
10. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2006 · 24 · 42910.12989/sem.2006.24.4.429 ↗
11. ACE J. Proceed. · 1985 · 82 · 423
12. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2007 · 25 · 7510.12989/sem.2007.25.1.075 ↗
13. Mag. Concrete Res. · 2004 · 56 · 1310.1680/macr.2004.56.1.13 ↗
14. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2005 · 19 · 18510.12989/sem.2005.19.2.185 ↗
15. Comput. Concrete · 2005 · 2 · 11110.12989/cac.2005.2.2.111 ↗
16. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2007 · 27 · 67110.12989/sem.2007.27.6.671 ↗
17. Comput. Concrete · 2008 · 5 · 13510.12989/cac.2008.5.2.135 ↗
18. P. I. Civil Eng-Str. B. · 2002 · 152 · 361
19. Mag. Concrete Res. · 2004 · 56 · 29910.1680/macr.2004.56.5.299 ↗
20. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2007 · 27 · 69710.12989/sem.2007.27.6.697 ↗
21. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2006 · 24 · 19510.12989/sem.2006.24.2.195 ↗
22. J. Struct. Eng-ASCE · 1988 · 114 · 180410.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804) ↗
23. Comput. Concrete · 2005 · 2 · 36710.12989/cac.2005.2.5.367 ↗
24. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2000 · 9 · 58910.12989/sem.2000.9.6.589 ↗
25. ACI Struct. J. · 1994 · 91 · 1
26. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2007 · 26 · 29710.12989/sem.2007.26.3.297 ↗
27. ACI Struct. J. · 1994 · 91 · 100
28. Struct. Eng. Mech. · 2005 · 21 · 3510.12989/sem.2005.21.1.035 ↗
29. J. Struct. Eng-ASCE · 1994 · 120 · 182510.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1825) ↗
30. Eng. Struct. · 2004 · 26 · 64110.1016/j.engstruct.2004.01.001 ↗